Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 113

Thread: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

  1. #21
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    12-15-17 @ 10:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,323

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by phattonez View Post


    People like this convincing otherwise normal people by alarmism and no statistical data are the reason why we don't talk about nuclear power.
    Are those the UEA professors?
    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

  2. #22
    Tavern Bartender
    Constitutionalist
    American's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Last Seen
    12-15-17 @ 10:49 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    76,323

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    hazlnut is coming unhinged. Calm down boy, before you blow a fuse.
    "He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
    "Fly-over" country voted, and The Donald is now POTUS.

  3. #23
    Global Moderator
    The Truth is out there.
    Kal'Stang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bonners Ferry ID USA
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,880
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
    Wrong. False. Show me the emails that said that.
    Google "Hacked email + global warming". First link that will come up is from the NY Times. Enjoy.

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
    Too bad it's carbon-monoxide that is the problem.
    Apparently despite the fact that you posted the OP you did not read the article that you posted.

    The Obama administration formally declared Monday that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions pose a danger to the public's health and welfare, a move that lays the groundwork for an economy-wide carbon cap even if Congress fails to enact climate legislation.
    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
    Why do people post when they don't know what they're talking about? Or have been misinformed by propaganda....
    Do us all a favor and look up "Photosynthesis". Although I have no idea how you could not know what it is unless you missed the day that they talked about it in science class in 3rd grade.

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
    And nevermind posting when you don't have a friggin' clue what you're talking about.
    Apparently you have even less of a clue than I do. You're the one that apparently didn't read the article that you yourself posted.
    I have an answer for everything...you may not like the answer or it may not satisfy your curiosity..but it will still be an answer. ~ Kal'Stang

    My mind and my heart are saying I'm in my twenties. My body is pointing at my mind and heart and laughing its ass off. ~ Kal'Stang

  4. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Naperville, IL
    Last Seen
    09-24-12 @ 02:14 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    11,963

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by Kal'Stang View Post
    Do us all a favor and look up "Photosynthesis". Although I have no idea how you could not know what it is unless you missed the day that they talked about it in science class in 3rd grade.



    Thank you for showing us all that you don't know what you're talking about. No. That's an understatement. You don't have any understanding of the issue being discussed in this thread. It's an alien language to you. Which begs the question: Why did you post?

    It's amazing how little far-right partisans actually know about climate change causes and science...You all are absolutely clueless.



    Apparently you have even less of a clue than I do. You're the one that apparently didn't read the article that you yourself posted.
    Question: Is the author of the article writing about (A) specifics, giving an in depth explanation of the different types of emissions and how they combine in the atmosphere to form a blanket that traps heat, warming the ground and water??

    OR...

    (B) Is the author trying to convey to laymen the general issue using a term (CO2) that many people are familiar with and not going into the complicated science?

    (Hint: it was short article on policy and not really on science...)

    Lastly, professor, since you brought up Photosynthesis -- what goes in: C02, what comes out: O2. What happens to the particles that can't be used in the process? Can a green plant photosynthesize more C02 than it needs? Can a green plant photosynthesize all carbon emissions?

    You should contact your third grade teacher immediately and see that she is fired -- she really did you a disservice.


    Dismissed, young man.

  5. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Epic Mountain
    Last Seen
    12-28-09 @ 06:07 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,384

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    I'm going to breathe deep in the hopes that I'll start suffocating some of you Environuts with my emissions.

  6. #26
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Epic Mountain
    Last Seen
    12-28-09 @ 06:07 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,384

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post



    Thank you for showing us all that you don't know what you're talking about. No. That's an understatement. You don't have any understanding of the issue being discussed in this thread. It's an alien language to you. Which begs the question: Why did you post?

    It's amazing how little far-right partisans actually know about climate change causes and science...You all are absolutely clueless.





    Question: Is the author of the article writing about (A) specifics, giving an in depth explanation of the different types of emissions and how they combine in the atmosphere to form a blanket that traps heat, warming the ground and water??

    OR...

    (B) Is the author trying to convey to laymen the general issue using a term (CO2) that many people are familiar with and not going into the complicated science?

    (Hint: it was short article on policy and not really on science...)

    Lastly, professor, since you brought up Photosynthesis -- what goes in: C02, what comes out: O2. What happens to the particles that can't be used in the process? Can a green plant photosynthesize more C02 than it needs? Can a green plant photosynthesize all carbon emissions?

    You should contact your third grade teacher immediately and see that she is fired -- she really did you a disservice.


    Dismissed, young man.
    Learn-2-Algae.

  7. #27
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Naperville, IL
    Last Seen
    09-24-12 @ 02:14 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    11,963

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by phattonez View Post


    People like this convincing otherwise normal people by alarmism and no statistical data are the reason why we don't talk about nuclear power.
    Don't be a smart ass.

    We know why tree-huggers and the far-left doesn't talk about nuclear power.

    My point is why doesn't big industry and big government talk about it?

    The same reason they didn't build a decent mass transit system in Los Angeles--it would have been too efficient and cost effective.

    or

    Why didn't they extend the L.A. Metro Trains all the way to LAX. Because the Taxi Cab union and other interests lobbied to have it stop before reaching the airport.

    Nuclear power would put too many people out of business. Where does the bulk of anti-nuclear propaganda come from--the tree huggers? No. Coal miners. Train lines that ship coal. Trucking lines that ship coal. Power producers who uses fossil fuels. Imagine if all those plants became obsolete. Instead of 10 energy companies and their subsidiaries, suppliers, and middlemen, we only need 3.

  8. #28
    Traditionalist
    phattonez's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Last Seen
    12-05-17 @ 03:45 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    20,072

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
    Don't be a smart ass.

    We know why tree-huggers and the far-left doesn't talk about nuclear power.

    My point is why doesn't big industry and big government talk about it?
    There is no popular support for it.

    The same reason they didn't build a decent mass transit system in Los Angeles--it would have been too efficient and cost effective.[/quote]

    Because we spent so much on a freeway system and decided to spread out our development. It was the fault of city planning, not some shadowy-organization.

    Why didn't they extend the L.A. Metro Trains all the way to LAX. Because the Taxi Cab union and other interests lobbied to have it stop before reaching the airport.
    Because the Green Line was planned during the Cold War and El Segundo was a major job center because of aerospace engineering. Unfortunately, while it was being planned/built, the Soviet Union collapsed. Who knew?

    Nuclear power would put too many people out of business. Where does the bulk of anti-nuclear propaganda come from--the tree huggers? No. Coal miners. Train lines that ship coal. Trucking lines that ship coal. Power producers who uses fossil fuels. Imagine if all those plants became obsolete. Instead of 10 energy companies and their subsidiaries, suppliers, and middlemen, we only need 3.
    When people think of nuclear, they think of bombs. That's why we don't have nuclear power plants anymore: a negative connotation.

    Who shall ascend the hill of the Lord? And who shall stand in his holy place? He who has clean hands and a pure heart, who does not lift up his soul to what is false, and does not swear deceitfully. Psalm 24
    "True law is right reason in agreement with nature . . . Whoever is disobedient is fleeing from himself and denying his human nature [and] will suffer the worst penalties . . ." - Cicero

  9. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Epic Mountain
    Last Seen
    12-28-09 @ 06:07 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,384

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Hey Hazlnut, you seen this?
    I figured it's right up your alley.

    [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQSt2hDqfEQ"]YouTube- re_acciona copenhagen[/ame]

  10. #30
    Global Moderator
    The Truth is out there.
    Kal'Stang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bonners Ferry ID USA
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    32,880
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Obama administration formally declares danger of carbon emissions

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post



    Thank you for showing us all that you don't know what you're talking about. No. That's an understatement. You don't have any understanding of the issue being discussed in this thread. It's an alien language to you. Which begs the question: Why did you post?

    It's amazing how little far-right partisans actually know about climate change causes and science...You all are absolutely clueless.
    I was responding to the article which, again, mentions carbon dioxide. As I already showed you. As you should have seen had you actually read the article that YOU posted.

    Not my fault that you can't keep up with what YOU post.

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
    Lastly, professor, since you brought up Photosynthesis -- what goes in: C02, what comes out: O2. What happens to the particles that can't be used in the process? Can a green plant photosynthesize more C02 than it needs? Can a green plant photosynthesize all carbon emissions?

    You should contact your third grade teacher immediately and see that she is fired -- she really did you a disservice.


    Dismissed, young man.
    This is tiresome. Learn your biology kid.

    Sciencedaily.com: Plants Absorb More Carbon Dioxide Under Polluted Hazy Skies
    I have an answer for everything...you may not like the answer or it may not satisfy your curiosity..but it will still be an answer. ~ Kal'Stang

    My mind and my heart are saying I'm in my twenties. My body is pointing at my mind and heart and laughing its ass off. ~ Kal'Stang

Page 3 of 12 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •