• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New Poll shows Tea party more popular than Republican Party

You can tell the ones that come to DP, to discuss and debate, and generally get along, then there are those like you. :shrug:

I posted a serious comment based on the numbers in the thread. You posted a lame-ass substanceless response. Who is here to discuss and debate?

What is the dems approval rating in congress? The house?

what is happening steadily to Obama's ratings?

Feel free to post those if you want. Instead of offering lame-ass substanceless responses.
 
Shocking. :roll: I give Misterman exactly what he asks for, and he cuts and runs. :lamo
 
You did? Can you link to them, I can't find them.

Post #1. The point of this thread.


You still have an attitude, dude.

Obama's numbers are low, yes, but that's to be expected right now. Doesn't change the numbers in post #1.

The number for Congress is for all of Congress, not the Democrats or Republcians. Try again.
 
Shocking. :roll: I give Misterman exactly what he asks for, and he cuts and runs. :lamo

You sure are eager to declare victory. You can't even wait an hour for my response.
 
Post #1. The point of this thread.


Uhm, DD posted that nonsense, not you.



You still have an attitude, dude.

It's just the Greatness, that is the Good Reverend, if your not a partisan hack, it doesn't bother you. :shrug:


I mean look at my present company.:lamo


Obama's numbers are low, yes, but that's to be expected right now. Doesn't change the numbers in post #1.


It does smack your claim down as nonsense:

Really? The numbers seem to show that the Democratic party is doing well and the Republicans are the failures.



Democrats in congress according to a gallup poll currently enjoy a 61% disapproval rating. :shrug:

Gallup.Com - Daily News, Polls, Public Opinion on Government, Politics, Economics, Management









The number for Congress is for all of Congress, not the Democrats or Republcians. Try again.



See your failure above.
 
Uhm, DD posted that nonsense, not you.

Oops, sorry.

(personal attacks ignored)

Democrats in congress according to a gallup poll currently enjoy a 61% disapproval rating. :shrug:

Finally! A number that matters!

Yes, the Dems in Congress aren't doing well. Historically, though, parties in Congress always have low approval ratings.

In post #1, the Dems overall (not just in Congress) have a higher rating than anyone though. Please go back to my original point and not make it into something it's not.












See your failure above.[/QUOTE]
 
Oops, sorry.

(personal attacks ignored)



You get what you give. Crying about it makes you look peurile. :shrug:


Finally! A number that matters!

Yes, the Dems in Congress aren't doing well. Historically, though, parties in Congress always have low approval ratings.

In post #1, the Dems overall (not just in Congress) have a higher rating than anyone though. Please go back to my original point and not make it into something it's not.


:lamo


Mein Party uber alles Misterman? :lol:
 
What personal attacks have I directed at you?


"attitude" :shrug: I don't care, I simply wont cry about it...



And we're back to the completely substanceless lame-ass comments.



Uhm.... It points out you are a hyper-partisan, who will cheerlead he democrats no matter what. Spinning a 61% disaproval rating into a "well that's normal"....


Sad :spin: really....
 
Uhm.... It points out you are a hyper-partisan, who will cheerlead he democrats no matter what. Spinning a 61% disaproval rating into a "well that's normal"....


Sad :spin: really....

LOL what do you think the right did with Bush's low ratings? They spun it like a top.
 
Mr

Spinning a 61% disaproval rating into a "well that's normal"....


Sad :spin: really....

No, perfectly normal. It's judging it against a standard, which the Republicans also set. It's quite common for pollsters to do that as part of their analysis. Too bad you don't understand that.
 
Really? The numbers seem to show that the Democratic party is doing well and the Republicans are the failures.

Look at your data again, be sure to look at trends.

87qntb1vtumtnrpranzfda.gif
 
Look at your data again, be sure to look at trends.

87qntb1vtumtnrpranzfda.gif

That's not my data. I was referring to post 1. This data doesn't include an option for "teabaggers."
 
Really? The numbers seem to show that the Democratic party is doing well and the Republicans are the failures.

No the system is corrupted and broken, The Supreme Court needs to declare the Dems and Reps. a monopoly and disloved like US Steel. Next thing thta needs to be fix is the elction no more of this crap of starting to run 3 year before the actual election. Further more it's time that the United States Constitution be upheld and used. No were in Article 1 Section does it state only a Dem or rep can run for the office if I decide to run then by Law my name should be put on all 50 State's ballots and I should be part of any debate that takes place. This doesn't happen hence the system is broke and a Monopoly.

Further more anyone who puts Party Loyalty over being an American is nothing more then a Traitor in my eyes and should Tared and Feathered.
 
No the system is corrupted and broken, The Supreme Court needs to declare the Dems and Reps. a monopoly and disloved like US Steel. Next thing thta needs to be fix is the elction no more of this crap of starting to run 3 year before the actual election. Further more it's time that the United States Constitution be upheld and used. No were in Article 1 Section does it state only a Dem or rep can run for the office if I decide to run then by Law my name should be put on all 50 State's ballots and I should be part of any debate that takes place. This doesn't happen hence the system is broke and a Monopoly.

Further more anyone who puts Party Loyalty over being an American is nothing more then a Traitor in my eyes and should Tared and Feathered.

Tell you something, there are alot of intelligent people on this forum, and alot of lunatics too.
 
Tell you something, there are alot of intelligent people on this forum, and alot of lunatics too.

Then I guess your saying that our Founding Fathers were Lunatics then is that correct. Let me guess your another one of those Party Mouth Piece's.
 
I think that would actually fall under "Free markets without regulations". The idea, I'm assuming, is that businesses should be treated like individuals, and if you can't regulate which guests you invite to your home, you can't regulate which costumers businesses allow. I'm not saying I follow that line of thought, just saying that opposing the Civil Rights Act does not make one a racist, whether or not that was your intended message.

Ummm - the civil rights act had as a goal making voting rights equal, doing away with segregated schools and removing discrimination by the government and providing equal opportunity for employment. The 1st reason Goldwater opposed it was because he thought desegregation should be left up to the states. Its the same line people who say the civil war was over states rights use so they won't say the 's' word. Please don't bull**** us with free market bull****? He disagreed with a grand total of 2 in 7 provisions in the act. At the time the bill was to be passed 80% of Republicans voted for it. Goldwater didn't. Just sayin'.
 
Last edited:
Then I guess your saying that our Founding Fathers were Lunatics then is that correct. Let me guess your another one of those Party Mouth Piece's.

Nope. Not the Founding Fathers.
 
No were in Article 1 Section does it state only a Dem or rep can run for the office if I decide to run then by Law my name should be put on all 50 State's ballots and I should be part of any debate that takes place.

Ok please explain how you have a debate with you (if you decide to run for president) and the other 50,000+ people that want to run for president?

How do you air that? How do you televise an honest and indepth debate with that many people?

That's not even including how large the ballot paper would actually be. Waste much paper?
 
Further more it's time that the United States Constitution be upheld and used. No were in Article 1 Section does it state only a Dem or rep can run for the office if I decide to run then by Law my name should be put on all 50 State's ballots and I should be part of any debate that takes place.

I'm not aware of any state that restricts the ballots to two parties.

Debates have nothing to do with the Constitution. Nobody has a right to be invited to a debate.
 
If the independents really wanted to debate, they can. Just spend the money and get a televised spot. Hell with as many as there are they could split the bill.
 
That's not my data. I was referring to post 1. This data doesn't include an option for "teabaggers."

You're an idiot. 1 - because you used the word "teabagger." 2 - because you're ignoring data. You said that the Democrats are successful and the Republicans are blowing it, or something to that effect. Here I show you what's going on in the trends and you just brush it aside! :roll:
 
Back
Top Bottom