Her and her partners lying and changing their story countless times and contradicted each other many times on their whereabouts.
Does lying necessarily mean they are guilty of murder?
Laila said:
Knox's own statement putting herself at the house the night Kercher was slain
A statement made under duress, according to the defense. Is there any evidence she was actually there?
Laila said:
A small sample of her DNA is found on the handle of a knife which has Meredith's on the tip, which is found at her boyfriend's flat next day and has been wire brushed clean and bleached and matches the wound.
It apparently did NOT match the wound.
Laila said:
She has changed her story completely in terms of her location. Firstly claiming she was there and that her boss at the local bar did it all! (destroying his business and putting him through hell I might bloody add, he is later proven to have rock tight alibi but not before the callous bitch tried to pin it on him) despite this alibi she stood by this statement and then later took it back.
Again...does lying necessarily mean she is guilty of murder? Are there any other reasons someone might lie?
Laila said:
She now claims she was at her boyfriends the whole night, but is still foggy on the details. A story she stands by, despite CCTV evidence strongly to contrary.
What is the CCTV evidence to the contrary?
Laila said:
The couple are discovered the next day outside the apartment with a mop and bleach and other cleaning equipment which she just bought and was said to be startled at being caught.
I haven't heard this before. Do you have a link?
Laila said:
Police and forensics state the apartment smelt of bleach and had been subject to vigorous cleaning activity, despite none of the blood being cleaned up.
So what was she cleaning up according to this theory?
Laila said:
Stefanoni, a forensics expert who testified in the hearing in May, suggested that it was Kercher's DNA on the tip of the knife and that the way the genetic material was positioned indicated the knife had probably been used to puncture the skin.
Have you ever pricked yourself with a knife before? Is it so unbelievable that two housemates would have DNA on the same knife? ESPECIALLY when the knife apparently wasn't the murder weapon?
Laila said:
The staged 'break in' where nothing was stolen, designed to make it look like a robbery/rape, linking Knox's blood to other room.
Huh? Knox's blood in the other room? Her blood was never found at the crime scene.
Laila said:
Undoubtedly trying to cover her tracks and divert attention away from her.
How does this implicate Knox specifically, as opposed to ANY random person trying to cover their tracks?
Laila said:
The stab wounds with two knives and 40 bruises found on her body numerous other pointers which can only be explained with multiple attackers contradits the claim that only one person was involved.
Why can this only be explained with multiple attackers? And again, how would this specifically implicate Knox?
Laila said:
Amanda wanting to pin it on a innocent man.
You keep repeating this...and it seems to have nothing to do with evidence, and everything to do with playing up an emotional argument. "She's a horrible person, therefore she committed murder."
Laila said:
If I was on that Jury, I would have voted guilty. If she was innocent she did everything possible to make herself look guilty and has no one but herself to blame.
I am not saying the prosecution is not without faults or rather I can criticise them on some things but to somehow say that by being a 'nice person' in the US now means she is incapable of murder is ridiculous to me.
There is no evidence linking her to this crime. Certainly not beyond a reasonable doubt. She never would have been convicted in this country, nor should she have been.