• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

New York State Senate Votes Down Gay Marriage Bill

That's a dangerous argument you are making.

Not that many on the left don't claim if you don't agree with their social policy you are "ignorant" or aren't "tolerant" enough.

The argument I was making was two fold.

#1 The attitudes towards gay marriage is progressing towards making it legal. This is supported by the fact that 30 years ago gay marriage couldn't even get on a statewide ballot.

#2 Saying that AIDS is the gay disease or that god will destroy the U.S. if it makes gay marriage legal is ignorant, intolerant, and nothing more than fear mongering.

Sorry you don't like the facts.
 
That's because only the stupid and the bigoted -could- disagree with them.

They are, after all, our elightened saviours.
:roll:

Go troll elsewhere.
 
#1 The attitudes towards gay marriage is progressing towards making it legal. This is supported by the fact that 30 years ago gay marriage couldn't even get on a statewide ballot.

Do you agree that if Gays and Lesbians opted for Civil Unions with the same rights as Hetero marriage and just dropped the word marriage they'd have gotten it this year, or at least gotten closer?
 
Do you agree that if Gays and Lesbians opted for Civil Unions with the same rights as Hetero marriage and just dropped the word marriage they'd have gotten it this year, or at least gotten closer?

Prolly the same if those that wanted interracial marriage wanted to opted for civil unions instead of marriage they would have gotten closer sooner.
 
Prolly the same if those that wanted interracial marriage wanted to opted for civil unions instead of marriage they would have gotten closer sooner.

Race and gay marriage are not equal.

Don't pretend they are.
 
Race and gay marriage are not equal.

Don't pretend they are.

Says you. I haven't known any gay people personally that choose to live the lifestyle of being outcasts and ostrasized by society simply because they choose to love someone of the opposite sex instead of just being straight.

Fact remains that gay marriage continues to proceed closer and closer to being legalized and people like you are going to have to deal with that just like those that were against interracial marriage had to deal with a white and black person marrying each other.
 
Says you. I haven't known any gay people personally that choose to live the lifestyle of being outcasts and ostrasized by society simply because they choose to love someone of the opposite sex instead of just being straight.

Fact remains that gay marriage continues to proceed closer and closer to being legalized and people like you are going to have to deal with that just like those that were against interracial marriage had to deal with a white and black person marrying each other.

Says science.

Its doesn't matter how many gay people you personally know.

It has never EVER been proven to be genetic in even 60% of any study that looked at homosexuality in general.

Sure someone will find some twin study and think thats proof but never ever has there been a general study that finds even common traits let alone genetics in 60% of homosexuals.

Its lost in every single state its been voted on.

You are going to have to face that as well.
 
The idea that people choose to like something is stupid. Especially homosexuality. Who the hell would choose that?

When do straights choose to be straight?
 
Says science.

Its doesn't matter how many gay people you personally know.

It has never EVER been proven to be genetic in even 60% of any study that looked at homosexuality in general.

Sure someone will find some twin study and think thats proof but never ever has there been a general study that finds even common traits let alone genetics in 60% of homosexuals.

Bull****.

Its lost in every single state its been voted on.

You are going to have to face that as well.

What does that have to do with "asking science".

What YOU are going to have to deal with is the fact that many of the older voters are going to die out and soon you will be left with our generation when the vote comes. I hope you live long enough to eat crow.
 
The idea that people choose to like something is stupid. Especially homosexuality. Who the hell would choose that?

When do straights choose to be straight?

That would be nature.

See it takes one man and one woman to procreate. You think nature would make it hard? no pun intended.
 
Bull****.

Then prove it. Show us the study.

What does that have to do with "asking science".

What YOU are going to have to deal with is the fact that many of the older voters are going to die out and soon you will be left with our generation when the vote comes. I hope you live long enough to eat crow.

lol you just keep on thinking that :rofl

BTW, old people didn't loose it for your state. Minorities did that. Go get em!
 
That's a dangerous argument you are making.

Which? His position on gay marriage or Navy Pride's ignorance?

Not that many on the left don't claim if you don't agree with their social policy you are "ignorant" or aren't "tolerant" enough.

Well, if you examine the margins on defeat of gay marriage bills over the past 30 years, they've gone from universal staggering defeats to barely scrimping by. Prop 8 was passed with a mere 4.2%.

On November 3rd [1998], voters in Hawaii vote 69% to 28% to amend the state’s constitution to empower the legislature to reserve marriage to opposite sex couples. This vote nullifies any positive ruling by the Hawaii Supreme court, effectively allowing the state legislature to ban same-gender marriage.

Same-Sex Marriage: As Hawaii Goes . . .

And yet the state has virtually no problems with a civil union status that is for all intensive purposes, separate but equal.

Given the decreasing margins of victory for the anti-gay marriage group, it's only a matter of time.
 
Then prove it. Show us the study.

I already showed two in this very thread that point to genetics. You threw out some random bull**** number of 60% rather than making a reasoned and logical rebuttal of the studies that were shown.

lol you just keep on thinking that :rofl

BTW, old people didn't loose it for your state. Minorities did that. Go get em!

Old minorities. Get your facts straight.
 
I already showed two in this very thread that point to genetics. You threw out some random bull**** number of 60% rather than making a reasoned and logical rebuttal of the studies that were shown.

Bull****.

You have never EVER produced that evidence.

Go ahead, produce them right now and I will be happy to destroy their credibility and your claim that they answer my challenge.

Old minorities. Get your facts straight.

Really. Got any proof of that or is this as believable as you magical studies?
 
Which? His position on gay marriage or Navy Pride's ignorance?

Neither. Keep reading.

Well, if you examine the margins on defeat of gay marriage bills over the past 30 years, they've gone from universal staggering defeats to barely scrimping by. Prop 8 was passed with a mere 4.2%.



Same-Sex Marriage: As Hawaii Goes . . .

And yet the state has virtually no problems with a civil union status that is for all intensive purposes, separate but equal.

Given the decreasing margins of victory for the anti-gay marriage group, it's only a matter of time.

I'm not arguing that gay marriage has gained ground. I'm arguing using the "ignorant, enlightened, and tolerant" argument to debate someone.

And for the record, I have no problem with civil unions.
 
Bull****.

You have never EVER produced that evidence.

Go ahead, produce them right now and I will be happy to destroy their credibility and your claim that they answer my challenge.

I suggest you start reading back, sparky. I have no interest in jumping through the hoops of a proven liar.
 
I suggest you start reading back, sparky. I have no interest in jumping through the hoops of a proven liar.

I didn't think so.

And yes the personal attack without evidence to back it up the charge you made.
 
I didn't think so.

You could have punctuated that sentence at the end of the word "think" and you would have been just fine.

And yes the personal attack without evidence to back it up the charge you made.

Where did you get this 60% number? Also telling me I never posted studies was a blatant lie.

So what else am I supposed to think of your level of honesty, champ?
 
I already showed two in this very thread that point to genetics.

I just went through this entire thread.

You provided no link to any study anywhere in this thread.

The only liar here is you Skippy.
 
I just went through this entire thread.

You provided no link to any study anywhere in this thread.

The only liar here is you Skippy.

Uh-huh. Just keep digging that hole, man. Just keep digging that hole.

And where'd you get the 60% number from, Chuckles?
 
Back
Top Bottom