Many independent people have commented on it. Where have you been??Or this one:
Couldn't someone say that you are kinda exaggerating a little yourself at this point? I'd rather someone independent have made these comments.
A. It's far more than two scientists.Having "climate change opponents" make claims that two researchers falsified info really doesn't tell me much. Little more details before we jump to conclusions, thus looking as guilty as the ones you accuse of being wrong.
B. Read the emails and data yourself.
You've already mentioned the main one yourself, Michael Mann.But I can give another chance to prove it. The Breibart article mentions e-mail between "leading US researchers" of global climate change. Do me a favor and list these people so we'll recognize their names when they get investigated, OK?
Others include Gavin Schmidt at NASA, Kevin Trenbeth and Colorado State, Tom Wigley of UCAR, Ben Santer at Lawrence Livermore, etc. Should I go on or is this enough for now???
Considering the trillions of dollars at stake, AGW needs a lot more research before it's validity can be on a par with the theory of relativity. The perpetrators of the falsified data should be prosecuted for fraud. Their grants depended on governments believing in AGW, and by premeditated lying, their crime is no different than Bernie Madoff's.
He has all the virtues I dislike and none of the vices I admire. ~ Winston Churchill
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)
Sure, and if you live near a freeway and don't like the pollution, then sue the government (which would then force only certain cars that pollute a certain amount be allowed on the freeway or else pay a higher price). Oh wait. There are no direct controls on auto pollution like this, which would actually be great.greater mpg is sensible,
Except that government won't set energy prices to market levels. I remember those rolling blackouts in California.and overall reduction of energy consumption is sensible,
If you ignore basic economics and think that government is a panacea for society's ills.reasonable and logical.
Yet the free market would do all of these things and do them better.these were the first approaches taken by those groups.
Who shall ascend the hill of the Lord? And who shall stand in his holy place? He who has clean hands and a pure heart, who does not lift up his soul to what is false, and does not swear deceitfully. Psalm 24
"True law is right reason in agreement with nature . . . Whoever is disobedient is fleeing from himself and denying his human nature [and] will suffer the worst penalties . . ." - Cicero
only 5% of climate scientists agree with the radical repubs on global warming.