• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Navy SEALs Face Assault Charges for Capturing Most-Wanted Terrorist

So what? What in the actions of the SEALs in arresting this war criminal is in any way different from what happens to any American criminal that evades Police?
The FAUX article says the alleged assault took place back at the SEAL base camp.

PS: The article contains conflicting claims about the nature of the alleged assault.
 
I can assure you that if you run, or fight back upon capture by any if not most Police officers here in the US, you will receive at least a bloody lip. I don't see our Police on trial for every arrest.
I testified during the punishment phase of a trial against a Garland Police Officer who was convicted of assaulting a suspect who suffered nothing more that a bump and bruise.

My testimony helped persuade the court to take away his Texas Peace Officer's license, for life.
 
I testified during the punishment phase of a trial against a Garland Police Officer who was convicted of assaulting a suspect who suffered nothing more that a bump and bruise.

My testimony helped persuade the court to take away his Texas Peace Officer's license, for life.




was this before or after your days as a space shuttle door gunner? :lol:
 
This particular terrorist appears to have three SEALS to back up his accusations, boo. The Faux article claims that,

Another three SEALs — two officers and an enlisted sailor — have been identified by investigators as witnesses

Have been ID as Witness to what they never stae in the Fox's report or anything that the Pentagon has released that they are Witness to this event.
 
I did that on a daily basis when I was in Special Operations, boo.

First off lets get this out of the way don't call me Boo or Bro, now really your were in SF so which branch where were you based.

Come on Junior these are straight forward question that you should have no problem telling us about.

We will be waiting:roll:
 
Prove to me that he's incompetent and abusive, and I will be more than glad to do that, boo.

As usual Chick**** Lib. you have no gutts nor and honor run along and play with your Erector Set Junior.
 
I don't like to brag, boo.

Now of all the lies you've told, this one is the most... laughable.

I joined the Army and tried to be Special Forces because I got drunk one night and bet a million dollars I could make it.


According to you, you "Tried" which implies you failed to be, which means you're a liar all around.
 
Moderator's Warning:
This thread is not about Whip Comes Down's service (or lack thereof). Let's get back to the topic at hand.
 
You know, people witness (through television) the actions and behaviors of our military at war and reminisce about the past and talk about how the "country of our grandfathers doesn't exist anymore," or how things today appear to be on the twisted path, or how the Geneva Convention is supposed to codify the end-all-be-all of warfare mannerism.

Let's take a moment to examine briefly the environment of our grandfathers...

Our grandfathers didn’t have to contend with a global leftist (our enemies back then, by the way) attitude that whatever he does is wrong. There was no media that focused primarily on being a global citizen rather than show his own country a bit of loyalty. He did not have to worry about what others may think about his conduct or how it will end his career if he’s not careful. No civilians shoved into his world to demand perfection and then complain when TV doesn’t show it. His politicians were actually creative and exhausted all means of diplomacy before he called upon the military to do the job for him. Nor did our grandfathers have to suffer through those same politicians, who originally failed at diplomacy, grab microphones later and protest for a diplomatic solution. His enemy played nice and wore uniforms and hailed from nations that claimed them. And the prisoners of war gathered by our grandfathers were treated as prisoners of war…not guests. Hollywood was full of veterans and the movies depicted American soldiers favorable and without the vicious attempts to drag them through the mud. And two atomic drops over Japan later we call them the “Greatest Generation.”

We’ve come a long way as a civilization. Today, our soldiers have to deal with not only a global left determined to hate them for what they stand for, but stomach American enemies on our own soil. The burden of warfare suffered personally by the serviceman is now a living room entertainment source for the masses who refrain from service. The media sees any military stumble as a cash cow. Our politicians know as much about military service as they do about today’s enemy, but this certainly doesn’t stop them from thrusting the military into situations it is ill prepared for going back to the 90s. And of course, our military can’t possible be successful on its own. As Pelosi informs us, Iran turned Iraq around not the sweat, blood, and determination of our military (showing us how far our politicians disdain military service and would rather offer an enemy a pat on the back than their own citizens in unifrorm). Today, our soldiers have to be mindful of the media cameras because any ungentlemanly conduct has the civilian population screaming for the enemy’s justice and the end of the U.S. military man’s career. Our prisoners of war receive religious rights, three square meals a day, living quarters, continuous civilian inspectors, and lawyers (and God help the military if the enemy prisoner smells bacon in the morning). Hollywood portrays our military as hapless victims of corporate greed or mentally or physically wounded beyond repair because of their profession. From Rambo shooting up a civilian town to the blunders of Black Hawk Down, all the way up to Stop Loss we see clearly where Hollywood’s making their military exploiting money. Where are the Audey Murphy’s and the John Waynes today? For that matter, where are the overwhelming films coming out of Hollywood today depicting the damage of WWII vets? I guess the Greatest Generation gets a clean bill of health while later generations military servicemen receive disgust and pity.


The “Greatest Generation” had the benefit of belonging to a civilization that trusted it’s military. It was allowed to win. It was allowed to do what was necessary to bring victory to the American people. Today’s generation has to fight through the American boos in an attempt to force them into receiving any kind of success. And the reason is because we have gone from a culture that cared more about winning to a culture that cares more about what we may look like. We sacrifice success at every turn because our focus is more on appeasing people who, frankly, do not matter because they don't have a stake in our protection and security. Our military is constantly denied what it demands it needs. And then it is criticized by civilian, media, and politician for not performing magic. We are even accused of genocide and slaughter, not for what we do, but because Muslims find it historically trendy to kill each other on grand scales. Funny how two atomic bombs over civilian cities in 1945 are attributed to the “Greatest Generation.” You see, our grandfathers understood what it took to win. They understood that defeating an enemy meant convincing him of his defeat. Today, we expect to spare our enemy death’s fate in hopes that peace will come through our “goodness.” We expect our military to restrain themselves to the strictest codes and laws of war in history even if they fly in the face of history’s lessons of victorious military campaigns. We’ve gone from accepting nuclear guarantees of unconditional victories to looking for the possibility of courts martial for our own men if they dare behave less than perfect in combat situations.
 
Last edited:
This is the best military in the world, far surpassing that of my grandfathers. These men and woman today, are the most well trained, the most responsible, the bravest we have ever seen. Not to take anything away from "the greatest generation", but the advancements made in todays military are nothing short of amazing. If only we could only get rid of this PC nonsense that has spread like a cancer throughout the military, that would be nice.

People seem to forget what war really is, it is violence, it is pain and suffering, it is hell, for lack of a better word, and always will be. I just think you go to war to win, by what ever means necessary, then you come home.
 
What American enemies on our own soil?

Muslims of course, and our tolerance of their intolerance. The Koran is a dangerous book, it teaches its readers that it is o.k to kill the infidel, or non-believer.

How long are we going to tolerate this?:confused:
 
Not until we can make the bible illegal, buddy.

I am not about book banning, I am about freedom, that said, I wish all religious books would disappear, we would all be better off.

I am all for pointing out the obvious, it is time we stop walking on egg shells with muslims, and start to address their teachings, buddy.
 
No soldier has ever bled for me.
My freedom has never been at risk from a foreign power since we were warring with england.

Not that I was alive then...
And chances are most of our families hadnt immigrated at that point.
 
Last edited:
No soldier has ever bled for me.
My freedom has never been at risk from a foreign power since we were warring with england.

Not that I was alive then...
And chances are most of our families hadnt immigrated at that point.

Are you saying that we do not need our military and that have we never needed our military since the revolutionary war?
 
No soldier has ever bled for me.
My freedom has never been at risk from a foreign power since we were warring with england.

Because your way of life has been preserved by outside forces? Trade routes and imports have been stable and maintained because the outside has been kind?

Plenty have bled for your sorry ass. You are that typical nobody who takes everything his life has been for granted as if magically preserved.
 
OOOooOOoOhh. Don't venture to the "outside world" outside of our beautiful stable fortress, merika.

You admit you're sheltered.
And you have the opinion of someone who regards the rest of the world as some other-wordly place to be policed to sustain an ideology.

Our relationship with the world is a modern analogy to early colonization perpetrated by european nations. Am I supposed to be proud of that? Am i supposed to be proud that you measure progress and we live our comfortable lives through military threat?

Sure they bled, bled so we could owe a debt to china and have flatscreen TVs built in Asia.

I wouldn't be half as free without my flatscreen TV I tell ya. Those soldiers bleeding for my life? No ****ing way.

I do appreciate the intervetion in Europe though. That was nice, the Germans or Soviets not taking over everything.
 
Back
Top Bottom