Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678
Results 71 to 77 of 77

Thread: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

  1. #71
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Past the edge of the universe, through the singularity, and out the other side.
    Last Seen
    09-01-10 @ 05:23 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,324

    Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

    Quote Originally Posted by Orius View Post
    Are you afraid that they might speak the truth?
    The truth? You mean the real reason why they attacked us that has nothing to do with our foreign policy but rather with the Islamist foreign policy of bringing the entire world of dar al-Harb into the fold of dar al-Islam through offensive jihad?

  2. #72
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

    [quote=Agent Ferris;1058384830]The Constitution is not an international treaty sport.



    It's clear from your statements that you believe that this should be a trial of the U.S. and not the terrorists who murdered 3,000 U.S. civilians.

    Come on...



    Provide evidence of a systematic genocide perpetrated by the U.S..

    Whats so special about systematic?

    Yes the Islamic conquerors who now rule Afghanistan perpetrated massive genocide and forced population transfers on the indigenous peoples of the Indian subcontinent. In fact prior to Stalin and Hitler this was the largest genocide in history.



    In Vietnam the U.S. was in a legitimate military conflict against communist aggression.

    Started through illegal means, Tonkin Gulf wiki it...

    The U.S. doesn't target civilians.

    Only it has on many many many occasions, not recently, it conducts its war in a much more politically intelligent manner nowadays.

    Was a legitimate military target and there were no civilians present as at that time Germany was engaged in total war.

    Wait I thought we didnt commit genocide... so the 'civilians' were actually military targets because of a magical term you call 'total war' which has no place in reality took effect?

    Was a legitimate military target and there were no civilians present as at that time Japan was engaged in total war.

    Except a few hundred thousand civilians died. :

    A) There was at least one attack on a U.S. ship in the Gulf of Tonkin, and the Gulf of Tonkin was only a precursor to escalation in a war which had already begun and which had been started by the communists.

    B) All 16 members of the U.S. intelligence community as well as numerous foreign intelligence agencies believed Saddam had WMD, a lie implies intent to deceive. And; furthermore, Iraq had been collaborating with Islamist terrorists (including AQ affiliates) to attack the U.S. right up until the fall of Baghdad and had perpetrated numerous acts of war against the U.S..

    Thats nice selective false information for you


    Trials by military tribunal are not antithetical to those concepts. But ya I suppose in your assbackwards worldview unlawful alien combatants have an unalienable right to a platform to justify the murder of 3,000 U.S. civilians.




    Once again why do you believe that these people have a right to a platform from which to launch anti-American propaganda, and justify the murder of 3,000 U.S. civilians?

    I'm assbackwards? You're the american I presume.

    Most people would look at your post then put a finger to their head and start making a circle.

  3. #73
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

    Quote Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
    Oh yes. That is what we're afraid of. We ceratinly know they wouldn't lie about their treatment or reasoning to gain headlines and increase their numbers.

    We'll call you guys when we need more beer mmmkay?
    How does their being terrorists alter their integrity more so or less so than any other man.

    They're probably very righteous people.

    But I must be a naive lib I'm sure they would lie. They'd probably say the US set up a torture camp or something.

  4. #74
    Hippie Hater
    texmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dallas TEXAS
    Last Seen
    08-20-15 @ 01:17 AM
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    3,969

    Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    How does their being terrorists alter their integrity more so or less so than any other man.
    Because it doesn't make the increbille mistake of comparing them to common criminals.

    They're probably very righteous people.
    Its called Islamic fundamentalists.

    But I must be a naive lib I'm sure they would lie. They'd probably say the US set up a torture camp or something.
    And yet you support giving them that platform.
    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams

  5. #75
    Hippie Hater
    texmaster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Dallas TEXAS
    Last Seen
    08-20-15 @ 01:17 AM
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    3,969

    Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

    The gunman who killed 12 people today at Ft. Hood appears, based on current media reports, to be Army psychiatrist Nidal Hasan who was listed as a participant in a Homeland Security Policy Institute's presidential transition task force last year.




    Nidal Hasan: Ft. Hood Shooter Participated in Homeland Security Disaster Preparation - Malik nidal hasan - Gawker
    Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.

    John Adams

  6. #76
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

    Quote Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
    And yet you support giving them that platform.
    It's that I don't fear what they have to say.

    You can come up with all sorts of cockamamy excuses as to why they should have no right. But some of us want to hear what they have to say.

    Because were secretly with the terrists...

  7. #77
    Educator ScottD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Last Seen
    06-27-11 @ 03:31 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    977

    Re: Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want platform for views

    Quote Originally Posted by texmaster View Post
    The gunman who killed 12 people today at Ft. Hood appears, based on current media reports, to be Army psychiatrist Nidal Hasan who was listed as a participant in a Homeland Security Policy Institute's presidential transition task force last year.




    Nidal Hasan: Ft. Hood Shooter Participated in Homeland Security Disaster Preparation - Malik nidal hasan - Gawker
    Factcheck proved this as a false article days ago.

    This is another false e-rumor. Army Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan was merely an audience member at some public events of a university-sponsored group that offered unsolicited advice to the new administration.
    Homeland Security Adviser? | FactCheck.org

Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 678

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •