• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama rewards big donors with plum jobs overseas

RightinNYC

Girthless
DP Veteran
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
25,893
Reaction score
12,484
Location
New York, NY
Gender
Male
Political Leaning
Slightly Conservative
Obama rewards big donors with plum jobs overseas - POLITICO.com Print View

He may have promised to change Washington, but President Barack Obama is continuing one of its most renowned patronage traditions: bestowing prized ambassadorships on big donors.

Of the nearly 80 ambassadorship nominations or confirmations since Obama’s Inauguration, 56 percent were given to political appointees and 44 percent have gone to career diplomats, according to records kept by the American Foreign Service Association.

The latest nomination came this week, when Beatrice Wilkinson Welters was nominated to serve as ambassador to the island nation of Trinidad and Tobago in the Caribbean.

Welters, a longtime advocate for underprivileged children, and her husband, Anthony, an executive with UnitedHealth Group, generated between $200,000 and $500,000 in donations to Obama’s presidential campaign and an additional $100,000 for his Inauguration, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group that tracks political giving.

The Welters can be counted among the nearly two dozen Obama bundlers — fundraisers who together organized and solicited more than $10 million in donations during the 2008 campaign — who now are being dispatched to some of the world’s greatest cities.

Charles H. Rivkin, a Los Angeles-based children’s television executive and an $800,000 bundler, is in Paris; Alan Solomont, a Boston-based investor and $500,000 bundler, is in Madrid; Louis B. Susman, a Chicago investor and $500,000 bundler, is in London; and Don Beyer, a Virginia Volvo dealer and $745,000 bundler, is in Bern, Switzerland.

Nicole Avant, a member of a Motown family dynasty who is credited with bundling up to $800,000 for Obama, was granted the coveted and cushy ambassadorship in Nassau, Bahamas.

Obama never promised an end to the practice of ambassadorial patronage. In an appearance before his Inauguration, he said, “it would be disingenuous for me to suggest that there are not going to be some” political appointments.

But what has surprised some foreign policy experts is how traditionally Obama has defined the word “some”: Thus far, the president has not plucked a single career diplomat to fill a traditional political appointment.

Obama is not the first and will not be the last to do this, but it's still amusing to see how this will be ignored by so many. Giving a plush, taxpayer-funded job to a millionaire donor whose husband is part of a group that Obama has done his damndest to demonize? Hilarious.
 
Are you trying to say that the American government is corrupt?

My word, are you so insensitive to the feeeeeeeeeelings of our Pleasant Democracy?
 
As Mel Brooks said in a Movie "I't good to be the King" sort of beginning to to look like any corrupt politician even with the lie, no sorry "promise" of openness, transparency, and honesty. I make zero out of three on this score card.
What did anyone expect he's be caught in 158 confirmed lies and did someone say he rented out the Lincoln Bed room. Hey wait a minute didn't the Dims (no spell error) raise hell and make all kinds of accusations? Oh well the Dims are really adept at doublespeak and double standards.
I wonder what else is for sale from Obama.
 
What are the chances the President or the VP are going to award his donors nobid war contracts?

What president has not awarded some of their qualified donors with government postitions of all sorts?
 
Last edited:
Why is it every time something bad comes out about one party you have people who instead of saying why they did that or say yes that is wrong they always come back with the usual yeah but look what others have done responce. As long as Americans are willing to put up with this kind of nonsence from our leaders we dont deserve a better GOV. Lets keep playing the blame the other guy game and not demand more from out leaders.
 
Last edited:
Why is it every time something bad comes out about one party you have people who instead of saying why they did that or say yes that is wrong they always come back with the usual yeah but look what others have done responce. As long as Americans are willing to put up with this kind of nonsence from our leaders we dont deserve a better GOV. Lets keep playing the blame the other guy game and not demand more from out leaders.

Why is the awarding this ambassadorship a bad thing? Is this person not qualified for the position?

Explain please the bad things that come with this appointment other than they apparently donated to Obama's campaign?

Obama and the people who contributed to his campaign including bundlers all won the election...He(the President) can appoint who ever he wants to appoint.
 
Last edited:
Funny....how people really believed that Paul Bremer was actually qualified to be the Ambassador to Iraq..the guy was a freaking unqualified disaster.
Who's campaign did he donate to?

I would like to know why these Obama appointees are not qualified for the positions.
 
Funny....how people really believed that Paul Bremer was actually qualified to be the Ambassador to Iraq..the guy was a freaking unqualified disaster.
Who's campaign did he donate to?

I would like to know why these Obama appointees are not qualified for the positions.

Because someway or another they have links to the Political game.
 
What are the chances the President or the VP are going to award his donors nobid war contracts?

Which has what to do with what?

What president has not awarded some of their qualified donors with government postitions of all sorts?

None since 1960. What does that have to do with anything?

Why is the awarding this ambassadorship a bad thing? Is this person not qualified for the position?

Presumably not, given that they're being selected on the basis of their donations rather than their career service as diplomats.

Explain please the bad things that come with this appointment other than they apparently donated to Obama's campaign?

Rather than a career diplomat with experience, we have rich folk serving as diplomats and collecting government paychecks.

Obama and the people who contributed to his campaign including bundlers all won the election...He(the President) can appoint who ever he wants to appoint.

Of course he can. Nobody said he can't.

Funny....how people really believed that Paul Bremer was actually qualified to be the Ambassador to Iraq..the guy was a freaking unqualified disaster.

You're bouncing around a bit here, going between defending Obama, attacking Bush, and saying that these people are qualified. Pick a theme and stick with it.

Who's campaign did he donate to?

http://www.opensecrets.org/indivs/s...and=&all=Y&sort=N&capcode=chbgt&submit=Submit

Nobody.

I would like to know why these Obama appointees are not qualified for the positions.

Because none of them have any experience as diplomats and are being appointed instead of career diplomats?

Stop playing dumb - if it were a Republican doing this, you wouldn't hesitate to call them unqualified.
 
If it were a Republican doing it they would just tell the second place winners to stop whining unless they have reason to complain. We have all witnessed it.
The President can appoint anybody he wants. I would still like to see why his appointees are not qualifed for these positions? A person has to have previous ambassadore experience to be qualified for the appointments? What is the exact diplomatic experience that the people need in order to be qualified?
 
Last edited:
Alright, now that we've established both sides of the "2-Party" system would be doing it, let's throw them all out and start over.
 
I say let's wait about 7 years and 2 months to make that change...the second place winners just have to roll with it until then...:lol:
 
I'm still trying to figure out what GD's political lean is. It's a total mystery...:lol:
 
What President in the past 40 years ran on a campaign focused around a "Change to Politics as Usual", a Change from political cronism, a Change from corruption and kick backs?

That's right, Barack Obama.

On things like this that is why Obama gets more critisism than others. He geared a LARGE portion of his campaign around complaining about this very type of thing, used these type of issues as a way to push his "Change" message and get people on board with him, and that's why this is a bigger issue for him. Its why him having lobbyists in his administration was a bigger issue. Its why executive orders for him was a bigger issue. Yes, they're things every President does...but they're things he specifically campaigned against and geared his campaign message around changing. As such, you can't say "well everyones done it" because that message is the very thing that helped get him elected.
 
Let's see. Before Obama was inaugurated he said there would be political appointments. Obama never promised to abolish political appointments. Ambassadorships are not civil service positions. A bundler is someone who likely supports Obama's positions and will be a loyal voice in the world's capitals. There are no assertions that any of these people will do harm in their positions.


What's the scandal again?

Oh yea, bash Obama for not keeping a promise he never made. :roll:
 
What President in the past 40 years ran on a campaign focused around a "Change to Politics as Usual", a Change from political cronism, a Change from corruption and kick backs?

That's right, Barack Obama.

On things like this that is why Obama gets more critisism than others. He geared a LARGE portion of his campaign around complaining about this very type of thing, used these type of issues as a way to push his "Change" message and get people on board with him, and that's why this is a bigger issue for him. Its why him having lobbyists in his administration was a bigger issue. Its why executive orders for him was a bigger issue. Yes, they're things every President does...but they're things he specifically campaigned against and geared his campaign message around changing. As such, you can't say "well everyones done it" because that message is the very thing that helped get him elected.

Why would a successful businessman (requirement to be a big donor) not be qualified to be Ambassador to Fiji? What is it about that job that requires a background other than being educated, qualified, responsible, and eager for the position?
 
some things never change.

I think that's why those jobs are there. I mean, what responsibility does an ambassador have besides looking good at dinner?
 
Where else will he find plum jobs these days but overseas?
 
Back
Top Bottom