• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Military Spending Weighs on Obama's Afghan Decision

We don't need to be paying for half of the world's aircraft carriers.

Can you justify that? How many oceans are there, how many active trouble spots where we want a carrier, and what percentage of time can a carrier be deployed? Hint: you want at least 3 times the number of carriers as you want carriers deployed at one time.
 
I was a millionaire several times over when I was in Special Forces.

Better watch what you say about being rich. Obama is so desperate for money he is offering to shine royal scepters with his royal mouth. Or did you miss his lasted offer to royalty, or as some call it respectful bow.:lol:
 
I want to have one more carrier than any other nation has.

And what will that allow us to do? That would be 3 carriers, which would allow one deployed at a time.
 
It would keep evil Presidents like George Bush from starting wars for no reason.

It will also allow evil foreign presidents/dictators like Kim Jung Il greater freedom of action against their neighbors.
 
Back
Top Bottom