• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Paratrooper's Mom Begs Obama: 'End It'

That's Libbo for, "if you tell me that the sun rises in the east, I'll demand proof".

:rofl:rofl:rofl

That's apdst for you..."If I get caught lying and can't get out of it I'll dodge the questions and just spam thread with bull****."

You crack me up.
 
That's right. Care to prove me wrong?

I don't have to. Your comment is so devoid of factual integrity that it doesn't warrant any effort to debunk it.
 
Insurgent vs. terrorist. The distinction is not always clear. The two are not mutually exclusive nor are they always synonymous. Which is one of my points here in light of the "we've killed over 50,000 terrorists." No, we have not. As your article clearly counters that notion.

One of my arguments is the deliberate misrepresentation of the situation that some attempt to undertake.

Agree'd. Insurgents can become Terrorists if they change their MO, and obviously a Terrorist isn't always an insurgent.
 
Agree'd. Insurgents can become Terrorists if they change their MO, and obviously a Terrorist isn't always an insurgent.

Epic gets it. Why is this so hard? Oh I know. Because in apdst's mind, as evidenced by his last comment...they're all terrorists, they just aren't operational yet.

:rofl
 
Last edited:
Then, again, he might be proud of you. Ya never know.

No, he would be mortified to have mommy out whining about his boss. Like 10 said, he'd catch a lot of flack for it. There are ways to make statements without using the media for 15 minutes of fame. I may have a POV, but I would not want to be spotlighted as the soldier's mother making that POV.

Of course as Lerxst pointed out, the kid is gone (?), so I guess my point is moot.
 
No, he would be mortified to have mommy out whining about his boss. Like 10 said, he'd catch a lot of flack for it. There are ways to make statements without using the media for 15 minutes of fame. I may have a POV, but I would not want to be spotlighted as the soldier's mother making that POV.

Of course as Lerxst pointed out, the kid is gone (?), so I guess my point is moot.

I hope your son comes home safe and soon.
 
I hope your son comes home safe and soon.

Oh Jackboot, that's so sweet of you. My example is hypothetical because my son's only 9. There are lots of mothers and fathers here making this sacrifice. I'm not one of them. :3oops:
 
I don't have to. Your comment is so devoid of factual integrity that it doesn't warrant any effort to debunk it.

Devoid of factual integrity, if you prove me wrong. Obviously, I'm not the one dodging the question.
 
Devoid of factual integrity, if you prove me wrong. Obviously, I'm not the one dodging the question.

wait, you are not the one who claimed 50k terrorists killed with no source to back up your claim?
 
Epic gets it. Why is this so hard? Oh I know. Because in apdst's mind, as evidenced by his last comment...they're all terrorists, they just aren't operational yet.

:rofl

Why do insist on always making it about another poster? How did you make it to the staff? Incredible.
 
Oh Jackboot, that's so sweet of you. My example is hypothetical because my son's only 9. There are lots of mothers and fathers here making this sacrifice. I'm not one of them. :3oops:

Oh I'm sorry, I misunderstood.:3oops:

Well I hope he gets an A on his next report card.;)
 
Agree'd. Insurgents can become Terrorists if they change their MO, and obviously a Terrorist isn't always an insurgent.

The bad guys are the bad guys, no matter what terminology you use to identify them.
 
.. or just refer to them as bad guys. Then you're safe. :thumbs:
 
.. or just refer to them as bad guys. Then you're safe. :thumbs:

I wish it were that easy. Nowadays the lines blur, and you have to have a REASON for why they're bad. :\ it's a shame. All the honor has been bled from war and it's just as corrupt as the politicians who wage it.
 
I wish it were that easy. Nowadays the lines blur, and you have to have a REASON for why they're bad. :\ it's a shame. All the honor has been bled from war and it's just as corrupt as the politicians who wage it.

Typically, regardless of identity, the bad guys are the ones that are trying to kill you and your men. Nothing blurry about that.
 
The bad guys are the bad guys, no matter what terminology you use to identify them.

So in other words you really don't care about whether or not your claims are bogus since the actual definitions of words mean nothing to you. Couple that with with your proclivity to make random baseless assertions and you can see why debates with you go so poorly.

I've asked you a number of questions relevant to arguments you've put forward. I've debunked you more than once. You are the one who put forth the argument. Not me. I countered your argument. Successfully I might add. No matter how many times you make wild eyed proclamations and then say "prove me wrong" you aren't going to get out of the hole you dug here.

We can debate intelligently or you can continue to not answer the challenges to your arguments and continue inserting random nonsense.
 
Typically, regardless of identity, the bad guys are the ones that are trying to kill you and your men. Nothing blurry about that.

And this mentality is why we are where we are today. You don't seem to place any value on understanding your enemy or his motivations. You lack any real understanding of the implications of foreign policy and regional geopolitics.

Critical thinking. It's a good thing.
 
C'mon guys. Obama just needs more time.

He needs more time to "fix" the economy.

He needs more time to close Gitmo.

He needs more time to end DADT.

He needs more time to rid Washington of evil lobbyists.

He needs more time to end rendition.

Just give him some time...
 
C'mon guys. Obama just needs more time.

He needs more time to "fix" the economy.

He needs more time to close Gitmo.

He needs more time to end DADT.

He needs more time to rid Washington of evil lobbyists.

He needs more time to end rendition.

Just give him some time...

Trudat! As displayed here by Viking-John

brandsonsale-store_2076_1218576667.jpg
 
Typically, regardless of identity, the bad guys are the ones that are trying to kill you and your men. Nothing blurry about that.

Since before we invaded pretty much no one in Iraq was trying to kill us, by your definition, we netted about zero "bad guys", since they did not exist till we made them.
 
Since before we invaded pretty much no one in Iraq was trying to kill us, by your definition, we netted about zero "bad guys", since they did not exist till we made them.

Are you aware of anything that went on in the Middle East prior to the Iraqi invasion? Do you think it was sunshine and rainbows until we showed up for no reason??
 
Are you aware of anything that went on in the Middle East prior to the Iraqi invasion?

Middle East - what, like Virginia? Or is that North Carolina. :2razz: Or more inland like Kentucky?

Hmm - explain, this vexes me so.
 
Back
Top Bottom