Neither side in an argument can find the truth when both make an absolute claim on it.
nebraska's stiff necked ben nelson on why he will filibuster reid PREVENTING EVEN DEBATE TO BEGIN:
"Well, first of all, it has more than a robust public option, it's got a totally government-run plan, the costs are extraordinary associated with it, it increases taxes in a way that will not pass in the Senate and I could go on and on and on."
(so could i)
"Faced with a decision about whether or not to move a bill that is bad, I won't vote to move it," he added. "For sure."
(these guys, stiff neck ben and jiltin joe, mean what they say, unlike progressives who posture to "improve" their piece, fully intending to support whatever monstrosity emerges)
(when a leftie declares she will kill leadership's bill, know that she is merely leveraging, bluffing; when a mod/con careens cannon shots, know such assertions are serious; ask pelosi and stupak)
what part of 40 + 2 don't you understand?
evan bayh (indiana) is next
also, start paying attention to the sources for these stories---abc, the ny times, the post, the hill...
that is, this aint fox and breitbart talkin
Ben Nelson better listen to his constituents and quit taking money from the health insurance cartel.
Last edited by Whip Comes Down; 11-12-09 at 02:01 PM.