Elena
Banned
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2009
- Messages
- 737
- Reaction score
- 40
- Gender
- Undisclosed
- Political Leaning
- Undisclosed
Not all Muslims think that way.
The one in question obviously did.
Not all Muslims think that way.
Can you blame them for that? Two muslim countries are already under an occupation and the third one is threatened.
You have to be American to see it that way.
Does it really matter if this guy was a "jihadist" (whatever that means)? He's already in custody, so does it really have any policy implications one way or the other? I suspect this is just a thinly veiled effort to bash Muslims, rather than anyone genuinely caring about his motives.
Why else would you bring it up?
It's like obsessing over the fact that OJ Simpson was black,
and constantly referring to him as the black killer of a white woman.
Or constantly referring to Bernie Madoff as a greedy Jew.
If someone constantly referred to them in those terms, wouldn't you think that was a bit racist?
Can you blame them for that? Two muslim countries are already under an occupation
and the third one is threatened.
The one in question obviously did.
So America is on a "crusade" to what exactly? Free people from extremism, and dictators so that they can NOT take any treasure, or land, and in fact hand back a more free society.....yeah we are terrible.
j-mac
No you have to just pay attention to reality. You have to be an Islamist sympathizer to see it any other way, but then again we know that you support Islamist Imperialist Expansionism and the global jihad.
Do Americans undergo compulsory lobotomy at birth or in their formative years?
Says the guy named "Kandahar" and with a self selected moniker of "enemy combatant." Folks pay attention here and from here forward! Now that this FAKIR is on my radar, I promise you a real good show from here on out. I can virtually guarantee you all the kinetic energy related will be supplied from one direction! The static energy, the moribund energy? It will be from the same direction of the plausible denial, the affected insult and the densely "shocked" that you would take it "that way" mindset.Does it really matter if this guy was a "jihadist" (whatever that means)? He's already in custody, so does it really have any policy implications one way or the other? I suspect this is just a thinly veiled effort to bash Muslims, rather than anyone genuinely caring about his motives.
You are breathing and have a heart beat, so does it really mean you have something of even minor importance to contribute, one way or another on something approaching a "thoughtful" level regarding this topic? If you decide to shed that heavy coat of self imposed ignorance I'm still not certain you will have luck finding anyone interested in your spin on policy implications. Not kidding, feel free to poll this matter, with my name attached and the offer for you to "humiliate" me by vote as an option.He's already in custody, so does it really have any policy implications one way or the other?
Naturally....................and so thoughtful of you. Chuckle. God what a charlatan poser. I find it ironic that the so called "unbiased press" did not find it necessary to state Nidal was Islamic until the pictures of him, taken a hour or two prior to the massacre, were posted online. Somehow me thinks had be been "Christian" this would not be the case and would be the lead on the story.I suspect this is just a thinly veiled effort to bash Muslims, rather than anyone genuinely caring about his motives.
Ask Bush.
Anyone still want to argue that this wasn't religiously motivated and that he wasn't a jihadist?
That should have been enough to have him dishonorably discharged from the Army.
Clearly... he was a threat. I credit this failure to the Army's well documented lack of foresight.
lack of foresight in the Army is nothing new....
j-mac
Yes, this is true. There is no denying it.
The military needs to keep these jihadist assholes out of their ranks.
Do Americans undergo compulsory lobotomy at birth or in their formative years?
Did it cross your mind that it might have been motivated by the US "crusade" and the fact your country is currently occupying two Muslim states and is threatening the third one?
You have to be American to see it that way.
Do Americans undergo compulsory lobotomy at birth or in their formative years?
Until Muslim countries allow freedom of religion within their borders, they do not deserve any slack from the free world...
....
I'm not one to criticize our military efforts, but... really? No one could hear the Time-Bomb's ticking in the room?
Well a great deal of them already do (Turkey, Azerbaijan, Malaysia, Iran etc.) and we happen to be arming a great deal of the regimes that dont. (saudi arabia and the like). So the balls as much in our court as it is in theres.
That's a small faction of Muslims countries that do, kudos to them, however I'm more worried about Muslims in Free-Religion countries that are trying to elbow their way in.
also,
Their court. The ball is in their court, Dave.
JAWOHL MEIN GRAMMATIKFÜHRER!!!!
I would prove read my posts more carefuly if the responces i got had more to do with what i actually wrote