• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Fort Hood shooting: Nidal Malik Hasan 'said Muslims should rise up'

Elena said:
Can you blame them for that? Two muslim countries are already under an occupation and the third one is threatened.
Click to expand...

Yeah! They're running out of countries! Between the unjust Jewish occupation of Israel and the Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan, where are the Muslims to go?! Oh right, Europe. lol
 
Kandahar said:
Does it really matter if this guy was a "jihadist" (whatever that means)? He's already in custody, so does it really have any policy implications one way or the other? I suspect this is just a thinly veiled effort to bash Muslims, rather than anyone genuinely caring about his motives.
Click to expand...

No it's an effort to open your eyes as to the global jihad and Islamist imperialist expansionism.
 
Kandahar said:
Why else would you bring it up?
Click to expand...

Why bring up motive for a crime? :roll:

It's like obsessing over the fact that OJ Simpson was black,
Click to expand...

No it's like mentioning the motives behind the killings.

and constantly referring to him as the black killer of a white woman.
Click to expand...

No actually it's like mentioning him as a wife beater and a jilted ex-husband bent on revenge against his ex-wife.

Or constantly referring to Bernie Madoff as a greedy Jew.
Click to expand...

No actually it's like mentioning that Bernie Madoff ran a Ponzy Scheme for personal profit.

If someone constantly referred to them in those terms, wouldn't you think that was a bit racist?
Click to expand...

Islam is not a race, and Islamism sure as hell isn't a race.
 
Elena said:
Can you blame them for that? Two muslim countries are already under an occupation
Click to expand...


Both of which perpetrated numerous acts of war against the U.S.. You seem to forget that this was a response to Islamist Imperialist Expansionism and aggression.

and the third one is threatened.
Click to expand...

Which has, also, perpetrated numerous acts of war against the U.S..
 
j-mac said:
So America is on a "crusade" to what exactly? Free people from extremism, and dictators so that they can NOT take any treasure, or land, and in fact hand back a more free society.....yeah we are terrible.


j-mac
Click to expand...

Perhaps we can take a chapter out of the book:

Dealing With Muslims

Chapter 1: The Crusades

Christians got it right the first time.

The End.
 
Agent Ferris said:
No you have to just pay attention to reality. You have to be an Islamist sympathizer to see it any other way, but then again we know that you support Islamist Imperialist Expansionism and the global jihad.
Click to expand...

Do Americans undergo compulsory lobotomy at birth or in their formative years?
 
Kandahar said:
Does it really matter if this guy was a "jihadist" (whatever that means)? He's already in custody, so does it really have any policy implications one way or the other? I suspect this is just a thinly veiled effort to bash Muslims, rather than anyone genuinely caring about his motives.
Click to expand...
Says the guy named "Kandahar" and with a self selected moniker of "enemy combatant." Folks pay attention here and from here forward! Now that this FAKIR is on my radar, I promise you a real good show from here on out. I can virtually guarantee you all the kinetic energy related will be supplied from one direction! The static energy, the moribund energy? It will be from the same direction of the plausible denial, the affected insult and the densely "shocked" that you would take it "that way" mindset.

I can only surmise it is command of basic grammar and his "flim flam" approach that has befuldeled so many "net-citizens" thus far. Chuckle.

To clue you in, it is precisely 4:13 AM on November 7th in the year 2009. The same kid who panhandles as an "enemy combatant" named "Kandahar" while also playing at impartial, unbiased and the (based on my three and one half years observation) supposed paragon of rationality, is in fact quite opposite. Sure I could supply plenty of examples over the years to illustrate exactly and with detail, what I am talking about. But why not just start from scratch?

"Does it really matter if this guy was a jihadist?"

Well of course it does? Tell us, do you "intellectually" think otherwise? Oh please do!

Do you seriously mean to ask on the WWW, what the term "jihadist" means? Let me guess, you also want people to think of you as an at least moderately intelligent human being? Really DO let us know.

Kandahar said:
He's already in custody, so does it really have any policy implications one way or the other?
Click to expand...
You are breathing and have a heart beat, so does it really mean you have something of even minor importance to contribute, one way or another on something approaching a "thoughtful" level regarding this topic? If you decide to shed that heavy coat of self imposed ignorance I'm still not certain you will have luck finding anyone interested in your spin on policy implications. Not kidding, feel free to poll this matter, with my name attached and the offer for you to "humiliate" me by vote as an option.

Kandahar said:
I suspect this is just a thinly veiled effort to bash Muslims, rather than anyone genuinely caring about his motives.
Click to expand...
Naturally....................and so thoughtful of you. Chuckle. God what a charlatan poser. I find it ironic that the so called "unbiased press" did not find it necessary to state Nidal was Islamic until the pictures of him, taken a hour or two prior to the massacre, were posted online. Somehow me thinks had be been "Christian" this would not be the case and would be the lead on the story.
 
Last edited:
Elena said:
Ask Bush.
Click to expand...


So let me get this straight. Bush blundered his words when speaking about what was going on, in one of many of his less than articulate moments, and the murmurs start with you?


{he said 'crusade'....Crusade!...Crusade?...CRUSADE!....}



Get off it. We are no more on a crusade than Muslims are to take over the world and kill all infidels....Oh wait....:shock:


j-mac
 
Agent Ferris said:
Anyone still want to argue that this wasn't religiously motivated and that he wasn't a jihadist?
Click to expand...

That should have been enough to have him dishonorably discharged from the Army.

Clearly... he was a threat. I credit this failure to the Army's well documented lack of foresight.
 
Vader said:
That should have been enough to have him dishonorably discharged from the Army.

Clearly... he was a threat. I credit this failure to the Army's well documented lack of foresight.
Click to expand...



lack of foresight in the Army is nothing new....


j-mac
 
j-mac said:
lack of foresight in the Army is nothing new....


j-mac
Click to expand...


Yes, this is true. There is no denying it.

The military needs to keep these jihadist assholes out of their ranks.
 
Elena said:
Did it cross your mind that it might have been motivated by the US "crusade" and the fact your country is currently occupying two Muslim states and is threatening the third one?
Click to expand...

Did we occupy them before 9/11?
Do Muslim states that turn a blind eye to the terrorists operating from within their borders get a free pass?
 
Elena said:
You have to be American to see it that way.
Click to expand...

Until Muslim countries allow freedom of religion within their borders, they do not deserve any slack from the free world...
 
Elena said:
Do Americans undergo compulsory lobotomy at birth or in their formative years?
Click to expand...

Lobotomy? That just makes people passive. Perhaps you mean brainwashing?
All cultures do that to some extent. Which cultures use brainwashing in their places of worship while at the same time limiting education opportunities and exposure to the outside world? and then send out their youth to commit suicide while taking out the infidels, or those of a differing muslim faith?
 
UtahBill said:
Until Muslim countries allow freedom of religion within their borders, they do not deserve any slack from the free world...
Click to expand...

Well a great deal of them already do (Turkey, Azerbaijan, Malaysia, Iran etc.) and we happen to be arming a great deal of the regimes that dont. (saudi arabia and the like). So the balls as much in our court as it is in theres.
 
Arch Enemy said:
....

I'm not one to criticize our military efforts, but... really? No one could hear the Time-Bomb's ticking in the room?
Click to expand...

Sure they heard if but its a PC thing...........They did not want to offend Islamic Arabs in the atmy by making and issue what he said and did..........
 
Red_Dave said:
Well a great deal of them already do (Turkey, Azerbaijan, Malaysia, Iran etc.) and we happen to be arming a great deal of the regimes that dont. (saudi arabia and the like). So the balls as much in our court as it is in theres.
Click to expand...


That's a small faction of Muslims countries that do, kudos to them, however I'm more worried about Muslims in Free-Religion countries that are trying to elbow their way in.

also,

Their court. The ball is in their court, Dave.

JAWOHL MEIN GRAMMATIKFÜHRER!!!!
 
EpicDude86 said:
That's a small faction of Muslims countries that do, kudos to them, however I'm more worried about Muslims in Free-Religion countries that are trying to elbow their way in.

also,

Their court. The ball is in their court, Dave.

JAWOHL MEIN GRAMMATIKFÜHRER!!!!
Click to expand...

I would prove read my posts more carefuly if the responces i got had more to do with what i actually wrote ;)
 
Red_Dave said:
I would prove read my posts more carefuly if the responces i got had more to do with what i actually wrote ;)
Click to expand...

1. I did respond to your post

also,


I would proof read my posts more carefully if the responses I received had more to do with what I actually wrote.


JAWOHL MEIN GRAMMATIKFÜHRER!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom