• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

EXCLUSIVE: Democratic donors rewarded with W.H. perks

zimmer

Educating the Ignorant
Banned
DP Veteran
Joined
Dec 19, 2008
Messages
24,380
Reaction score
7,805
Location
Worldwide
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Conservative
Hope.
Change.
Unity.
Most ethical administration... yada, yada, yada...

TILT.

High-dollar fundraisers have been promised access to senior White House officials in exchange for pledges to donate $30,400 personally or to bundle $300,000 in contributions ahead of the 2010 midterm elections, according to internal Democratic National Committee documents obtained by The Washington Times.

"This administration has across the board set the toughest ethics standards in history. As a result, we have reduced special-interest influence over the policymaking process to promote merit-based decision-making," he (Dan Pfeiffer, deputy White House communications director) added.

EXCLUSIVE: Democratic donors rewarded with W.H. perks - Washington Times

But Mr. Gibbs was less forthcoming when asked about the DNC documents that promise access to senior members of the Obama administration.

Washington Times - Republicans seek probe of White House perks


In reaction:
The Republican National Committee (RNC) demanded an investigation into a report published in The Washington Times that top donors to the Democratic National Committee (DNC) had been rewarded with access to privileged White House tours, behind-the-scenes briefings and other perks.
Steele demands investigation into alleged WH perks for top Dem donors - The Hill's Blog Briefing Room
 
Last edited:
And?

Are you saying that during Bush this did not happen?
 
And?

Are you saying that during Bush this did not happen?

There is evidence of purported illegalities.
That's what the post was saying.

Try again.
 
There is evidence of purported illegalities.
That's what the post was saying.

Try again.

What is illegal about donors being allowed to meet officials? If this story is real, why did you have to go to Rev. Moon's newspaper to find it?
 
What is illegal about donors being allowed to meet officials? If this story is real, why did you have to go to Rev. Moon's newspaper to find it?

Donja mean donors paying to meet officials? :mrgreen:
 
There is evidence of purported illegalities.
That's what the post was saying.

Try again.

Try again? hello I asked, are you saying that such things did not happen under Bush? Yes or no?
 
Okay so what Obama is selling access and renting out the Lincoln Bedroom the same as Bush did what's the big deal. I remember pictures of Bush and some Chinese or Taiwanese guy of questionable character taken at at a White House event and the Dims (no spell error) going ape shiite or it. But then there was this outrage from the lefties talking about how it was pure denigration of the office because of the questionable practice of using the peoples House as a fund raising tool, and how it just proved Bush was a low life. Or words to that effect. I also remember hearing a great deal or rhetoric from the Dims about openness in government and access to information about pending legislation before any votes.
Wow come to think of it there seems to be something about to the stories of there not being a dimes worth of difference between the two major parties after all. Could it be that all the talk of no more possibility of corruption and a new refreshing openness and honesty in Government from Obama, Pelosi, and Reid was just another campaign ploy from the left? Let's take a quick trip down memory lane to before the election to see if Obama was doing anything misleading. You won't have to read so just sit back and relax for a minute and watch and listen. Obama Caught Again Lies After Lies - Google Videos
Golly I was taken in before the election. And here I thought Obama and all other Deities were infallible and therefore absolutely trustworthy at all times. In fact worthy of our praise and adoration.
Is it possible that in my excitement I have been beguiled into believing in a false Messiah like this guy; Obama Townhall meeting in fort myers florida Julio Osegueda - Google Videos

No I was never fooled by the massive lies from Obama, Pelosi, Reid or any of the massive the Dims spew forth on a daily basis. It seems ingrained in them to regurgitate BS and openly operate with double standards. They count on you being too stupid to notice or having a short memory.
This was despicable when Bush did it and there has been no change because Obama is to some the epitome of the second coming.
 
Try again? hello I asked, are you saying that such things did not happen under Bush? Yes or no?

So no HOPE and no CHANGE since Bush did it too. Got it.
 
Hope.
Change.
Unity.
Most ethical administration... yada, yada, yada...

TILT.






In reaction:

OMG....big political donors getting special treatment from the politicians they donated to!!!!! Holy crap, that's never happened before!

While I do think there really could be a problem here; this one isn't isolated to just Obama.
 
OMG....big political donors getting special treatment from the politicians they donated to!!!!! Holy crap, that's never happened before!

While I do think there really could be a problem here; this one isn't isolated to just Obama.

I agree with you.
 
Okay so what Obama is selling access and renting out the Lincoln Bedroom the same as Bush did what's the big deal. I remember pictures of Bush and some Chinese or Taiwanese guy of questionable character taken at at a White House event and the Dims (no spell error) going ape shiite or it. But then there was this outrage from the lefties talking about how it was pure denigration of the office because of the questionable practice of using the peoples House as a fund raising tool, and how it just proved Bush was a low life. Or words to that effect. I also remember hearing a great deal or rhetoric from the Dims about openness in government and access to information about pending legislation before any votes.
Wow come to think of it there seems to be something about to the stories of there not being a dimes worth of difference between the two major parties after all. Could it be that all the talk of no more possibility of corruption and a new refreshing openness and honesty in Government from Obama, Pelosi, and Reid was just another campaign ploy from the left? Let's take a quick trip down memory lane to before the election to see if Obama was doing anything misleading. You won't have to read so just sit back and relax for a minute and watch and listen. Obama Caught Again Lies After Lies - Google Videos
Golly I was taken in before the election. And here I thought Obama and all other Deities were infallible and therefore absolutely trustworthy at all times. In fact worthy of our praise and adoration.
Is it possible that in my excitement I have been beguiled into believing in a false Messiah like this guy; Obama Townhall meeting in fort myers florida Julio Osegueda - Google Videos

No I was never fooled by the massive lies from Obama, Pelosi, Reid or any of the massive the Dims spew forth on a daily basis. It seems ingrained in them to regurgitate BS and openly operate with double standards. They count on you being too stupid to notice or having a short memory.
This was despicable when Bush did it and there has been no change because Obama is to some the epitome of the second coming.

In point of fact it was clinton who rented out the lincoln bedroom. I do wish you democrats could keep your scandal information correct. :mrgreen:


source

....."The American people deserve to know that their presidency is not for sale, the Lincoln Bedroom is not for rent," Edwards said, invoking the scandal that erupted when it was discovered the Clintons had let campaign donors stay in the Lincoln bedroom of the White House during the 1990s......
 
And?

Are you saying that during Bush this did not happen?

It happened under Bush, it happened under Clinton, and it's happening under Obama.

This is relevant not because it's some brand new policy that Obama has developed, but because it doesn't comport with Obama's image as a political reformer who is free from these influences.

The fact is that Obama is not a new breed of politician - he's a politician. I don't fault him for that, but do fault him for pretending to be something that he's not in order to convince gullible people to vote for him.

What if George W. Bush had done that? - Josh Gerstein - POLITICO.com
 
Back
Top Bottom