Re: White House [continues to] Escalates War on Fox News
I would like you to show where I engaged in any personal attacks before Gibberish’s personal attack on me. Get back to me when you find it.
Where is your selective outrage at this unwarranted personal attack on me?
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...-escalates-war-fox-news-6.html#post1058315236
He was referring to your argument. Would you care to provide proof that he was attacking you personally there? Regardless, how exactly does that justify your personal attacks? And we aren't even just talking about Gibberish here. Most of your replies to people who don't agree with you have similar personal attacks. Do you take their disagreeing with you as a personal affront to you and then act accordingly? Is that how you justify it?
I would like to illustrate the irony of your comments by directing you to your first response to my comments:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...-escalates-war-fox-news-6.html#post1058315236
Um..that's not my response, it's the same link from above.
Now I want you to show where prior to my response to Gibberish’s personal attack on me I attacked anyone.....I'll be waiting.
Once again, calling your argument dishonest isn't a personal attack. Nice try, though.
Once again, your credibility is suffering when you selectively suggest that prior to the personal attack on me, I was engaging in personal attacks on ANYONE.
You act as if this is the first time, TD. You do it time and time again, which is why a lot of people around here have a problem with you.
So when someone is acting like a jackass and engaging in whiney hyperbolic stupidity they should not be called on it? What a fascinating view you have; and yet, you want to call me out on it?
Ah, but see...you appear to characterize damn near any post that disagrees with your point of view as "whiney hyperbolic stupidity." I call you out on it because it gets old. You are good at arguing and you would be a really good debater on these boards if you could focus your attacks on their arguments rather than them personally. Though, you just can't seem to help yourself and always include a personal attack against them.
I find this statement fascinating in that until the typical cabal of whiney Libruls started engaging in personal attacks on me, the thread wasn’t being derailed. I find your selective outrage beyond just amusing, but it suggest the need for therapy?
Don't worry, TD. I wouldn't expect you to see what you do. Few people have that ability.
You will have to be specific as there are a LOT of quotes above, the first of which you selectively ignored attack me personally. Here, let me refer you to it again:
http://www.debatepolitics.com/break...-escalates-war-fox-news-6.html#post1058315236
Once again, calling your argument dishonest isn't a personal attack.
Now you are free to show where I attacked Gibberish first, but that would be a futile effort. So now let me ask you a serious question, and I'm not attempting to be insulting any way, so I would highly appreciate a serious answer; why is it that your outrage at personal insults on this forum appears to only be directed at those you politically disagree with?
Perhaps that's how it is from your perspective, but I would be criticizing someone on the left just as much. Regardless, I don't fully disagree with you politically. I don't agree with your generalizations against Liberals, but I also don't agree with Liberals who make generalizations about Conservatives.
By the way, when the people who are thanking you are members like Jackalope, the answer might be TOO obvious for you to comprehend. :rofl
Okay, see..this is exactly what I was talking about. Where did I attack you personally first that warranted this comment? I asked you why you do this in a civil manner with no insults and got the same behavior you always exhibit. Frankly, I don't even know why I bother.
