Here is a few excerpts from a recent blog entry of mine:
I back it up by posting a number of public opinion polls.Originally Posted by Grim17
You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
The GOP has consistently tried to horn-in on the TEA Party movement.. To a certain degree they are tolerated.. but NOT at the 7/4 COBB Co TEA Party!
they had lined up thinking they were going to get to speak... that didn't work out for 'em!
I am actually getting encouraged though by progressives... you can smell the fear!
Now folks like Soros are trying to figure out how to jail us all!!
Special Initiatives | Open Society Institute
I was under the impression that capitalist economies went through boom and bust cycles.Wow, you're an economic theorist now, maybe the government should hire you since you seem to know more than them. In what sane mind is a free economy great depression preferable?That is correct; what economic theory suggests that a Government can borrow and spend its way out of one?
We bought out this bust cycle and prevented a great depression from what I understand.I SEE so its a secret plot, to undermine the economy ahh. I gotchaAnd that is the farcical lie only the most gullible among us can possibly believe.
I see so that was their plan. Wowie the implications are enormous, buddy. They're working to destroy the nation or sumthin. jeeze.What we did is buy ourselves and extended economic collapse
Our debt to gdp ratio is not that bad from what I hear. This bailout is a better economic plan than another war.I guess NPR is a liberal farcical powerhouse, when it told me that GDP to debt was sustainable.Another fracical assertion; but then again, you are attempting to defend the indefensible.
What do you think the current debt to GDP is right now?
The notion that we fight wars for economic gain is another farcical delusion
Year Gross Debt in Billions as % of GDP
2009 (est.) 12,867.5 20.0
1950 257.4 94.1
If the military structure was completely nationalised there would have been no iraq war for the lack of profit.
I see its for the purpose of creating a defecit ab initio. by GAWD. These men are surely nazis.instead create permanent deficits and dependent wards of the state.
Well it certainly wasn't his economy a couple months into his term when it crashed and Bush WAS around for 8 years JUST BEFORE HIM. So Im gonna go into a corner and think think think really hard about it and see what I come up with, you'll have to get back with me on that.You also cannot blame obama for the unemployment level, he inherited this economy.
How trite, yet you wish to blame the economy Bush inherited on Bush.
Tell me something, how many years do you think it will take before it IS Obama's economy?
Source?The unemployment level has climbed directly due to the policies of these Democrats and this President.
He also inherited the crumbling infrastructure that got grades of Cs and Ds, due to the bush administration.I was gonna say something abut the federal cuts to their funding.. but you can fly off and visit any planet you like.I find this argument laughable in the extreme; who do you think is responsible for States infrastructure?
Where was his promise that all effects would be instantaneous?Absolutely; he lied about Gitmo, he lied about Iraq and Afghanistan, he lied about creating 5,000,000 new high paying jobs and he will be proved a liar when the Democrats have to raise the taxes and fees to pay for the trillions of dollars they have spent that they dont have which has done NOTHING to create anything remotely considered to be economic activity.
I made no assumptions about you until you started posting like this.There you go again, making things up to fit your narrow partisan views of the world in a vacuum of reality and credible facts.
I bet you think you know what I think. You cut me deep, friend.I am hardly surprised a Liberal would have to ask such a silly question while pretending they don't know the answer.
I bet you think it is just a big Peace Corps.
RAAWR WE GOT TEH BOMBS TO TOALY SMASH THEM! Do you know what a military action against a country in modernity would entail (past destroying it, of course you seem to get that part, youre army strong arent you?)Another laughable yet farcical argument requiring the willful suspension of disbelief or the willful denial of reality and the facts.
Iran's entire military, economy and what little industrial capacity it has could be destroyed in a matter of weeks.
Ill stick to what I know form my political science major and what I know in that youre agression is just a display of your one-sidedness, and your lack of source quoting because you have none.Carry on; I look forward to more of your clown like assertions about economics, war and the human condition.
Congratulations you're the least enlightening debate I've had so far.
"He who does not think himself worth saving from poverty and ignorance by his own efforts, will hardly be thought worth the efforts of anybody else." -- Frederick Douglass, Self-Made Men (1872)