Page 5 of 61 FirstFirst ... 345671555 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 605

Thread: Obama reaffirms will end "Don't ask Don't tell"

  1. #41
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:49 AM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,569

    Re: Obama reaffirms will end "Don't ask Don't tell"

    Quote Originally Posted by Scorpion89 View Post
    Hmm you sure about that my Dad was a JAG Lawyer and JAG Judge the last 10 Years of his Military Service.
    Yeah, and he'd no doubt be slapping his forehead over this exchange.
    Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.-- Bernadine Dohrn

  2. #42
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    04-02-15 @ 06:08 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    8,211

    Re: Obama reaffirms will end "Don't ask Don't tell"

    Quote Originally Posted by Scorpion89 View Post
    No he can't order any part of the UCMJ to be abolished it would be a violation of the US Constitution only the USSC can over turn any part of the UCMJ.
    READ THIS:

    The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ, 64 Stat. 109, 10 U.S.C. Chapter 47), is the foundation of military law in the United States.

    Uniform Code of Military Justice - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    The United States Statutes at Large, commonly referred to as the Statutes at Large and abbreviated Stat., is the official source for the laws and concurrent resolutions passed by United States Congress.

    [ame=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Statutes_at_Large]United States Statutes at Large - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]

  3. #43
    Girthless
    RightinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Last Seen
    01-23-11 @ 11:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    25,894

    Re: Obama reaffirms will end "Don't ask Don't tell"

    Quote Originally Posted by Scorpion89 View Post
    Hmm you sure about that my Dad was a JAG Lawyer and JAG Judge the last 10 Years of his Military Service.
    Your dad's name could be Military J. Justicelawyerson and it wouldn't change the fact that you're completely wrong about this.
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

  4. #44
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    04-02-15 @ 06:08 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    8,211

    Re: Obama reaffirms will end "Don't ask Don't tell"

    Quote Originally Posted by RightinNYC View Post
    Your dad's name could be Military J. Justicelawyerson and it wouldn't change the fact that you're completely wrong about this.


    That would be a sweet name.

  5. #45
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    01-05-10 @ 06:26 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,629

    Re: Obama reaffirms will end "Don't ask Don't tell"

    This is why DADT can't be changed.

    925. ART. 125. SODOMY
    (a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.
    (b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

    End of the discussion the reason why DADT was enacted was because of this section. The USSC has refused to rule this or any part of the UCMJ Un-Constitutional hence the reason DADT was enacted christ folks go and ****ing learn the UCMJ

  6. #46
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    12-02-09 @ 05:13 PM
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    4,695

    Re: Obama reaffirms will end "Don't ask Don't tell"

    My Dad directly worked with all of the apollo missions but that doesn't mean I'm taking off too the moon anytime soon......

  7. #47
    Girthless
    RightinNYC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Last Seen
    01-23-11 @ 11:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    25,894

    Re: Obama reaffirms will end "Don't ask Don't tell"

    Quote Originally Posted by Scorpion89 View Post
    This is why DADT can't be changed.

    925. ART. 125. SODOMY
    (a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.
    (b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

    End of the discussion the reason why DADT was enacted was because of this section. The USSC has refused to rule this or any part of the UCMJ Un-Constitutional hence the reason DADT was enacted christ folks go and ****ing learn the UCMJ
    Question: Who enacted 925 Art. 125?
    People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.

  8. #48
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Chicago
    Last Seen
    04-02-15 @ 06:08 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    8,211

    Re: Obama reaffirms will end "Don't ask Don't tell"

    Quote Originally Posted by scorpion89 View Post
    this is why dadt can't be changed.

    925. Art. 125. Sodomy
    (a) any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.
    (b) any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

    End of the discussion the reason why dadt was enacted was because of this section. The ussc has refused to rule this or any part of the ucmj un-constitutional hence the reason dadt was enacted christ folks go and ****ing learn the ucmj
    Statutory law can be changed at anytime by the US Congress.

  9. #49
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    01-05-10 @ 06:26 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    2,629

    Re: Obama reaffirms will end "Don't ask Don't tell"

    Quote Originally Posted by Ethereal View Post
    READ THIS:



    The United States Statutes at Large, commonly referred to as the Statutes at Large and abbreviated Stat., is the official source for the laws and concurrent resolutions passed by United States Congress.

    United States Statutes at Large - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    AND READ THIS SECTION OF THE UCMJ

    925. ART. 125. SODOMY
    (a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.
    (b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

    End of discussion DADT can't be changed.

    So I expect all of you folks who work at the Pentagon to stop by my office on Tues. PM me and I'll give you my office and floor # and then we can have anice chat with some of the JAG folks at the Pentagon.

  10. #50
    Slayer of the DP Newsbot
    danarhea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Houston, TX
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:02 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Conservative
    Posts
    39,751

    Re: Obama reaffirms will end "Don't ask Don't tell"

    Quote Originally Posted by Scorpion89 View Post
    This is why DADT can't be changed.

    925. ART. 125. SODOMY
    (a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration , however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense.
    (b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.

    End of the discussion the reason why DADT was enacted was because of this section. The USSC has refused to rule this or any part of the UCMJ Un-Constitutional hence the reason DADT was enacted christ folks go and ****ing learn the UCMJ
    Again, you seem to keep avoiding the discussion of the use of an executive order by the President. Again, the only way the Supremes could get involved would be to decide on the issue of the Unitary Executive. Again, Bush used executive orders frequently, thus opening the door for Obama to issue one to end Article 125.
    The ghost of Jack Kevorkian for President's Physician: 2016

Page 5 of 61 FirstFirst ... 345671555 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •