Page 10 of 18 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast
Results 91 to 100 of 171

Thread: ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report

  1. #91
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Last Seen
    04-05-16 @ 06:04 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    8,260
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    Kidnapped because they intended to free palestinian men held without trial.



    Doh my irony meter over modern history's wars just explodinated. Halucinating... MAI LAI... over again... pant wheeze cough


    "And they rain rockets on homes its true. But Israelis knock homes and villages in half (literally) with an illegal wall and illegal territory grabs"

    "In response to rockets, yeah, so let's keep firing those."

    Pfft, cause the rational thing to do to stop a rocket that flies hundreds of feet in the air is build a cement wall. You just proved against yourself that the actions israel takes are not to defend itself but marginalise palestine.


    "I believe Israel has been quite tolerant to the Palestinians..."

    It's like you don't get that israel is an expansionist zionist state who believes that it has the right to all the land that the palestinians occupy thus expanding itself aggressively through the use of neighborhood projects geographically designed to undermine the economy of the palestinians. They don't allow aid to enter the country they don't allow imports or exports to happen and they are poor as dirt as a result. They control the utilities, like the electricity and the water and they shut them on and off with impunity. You don't get that the israeli army is made up of conscripted racist kids who run over cars with their tanks out of mean-spiritedness, who take pot shots at the civilians of palestine over the walls of the security fence - daily - so they cannot farm the lands they have occupied for centuries.

    I watch BBC and Al-jazeera because al-jazeeras foreign corespondency is superior to any domestic american service (who simply do not have the money for a good number of foreign correspondents)

    The term "Zionist" is racist and uncalled for. This is proof of your bias. As such, nothing you say will be taken seriously.

  2. #92
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Last Seen
    04-05-16 @ 06:04 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    8,260
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post

    Posting manufactured propaganda is lame. Please cease and desist.

  3. #93
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report

    Quote Originally Posted by creation View Post
    You seem to imply that despite the power of the nuclear weapon, since it is Israel holding it in the Middle East then it is ok.
    How do I imply that?
    Or, perhaps it was your inference?
    Either way, not sure how you derived it from my statement.

  4. #94
    Sage
    First Thought's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Last Seen
    12-01-10 @ 03:34 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    6,218

    Re: ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report

    Quote Originally Posted by Vader View Post
    El Baradei is a terrorist supporter. Nothing he says can be taken seriously.
    Oh, so he's a terrorist and a terrorist supporter? Still waiting for you to prove these bold assertions. I wait with baited breath, though I'm sure I set myself up for disappointment.
    "An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi

  5. #95
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Whitewater, CO
    Last Seen
    04-05-16 @ 06:04 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    8,260
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report

    Quote Originally Posted by EgoffTib View Post
    Oh, so he's a terrorist and a terrorist supporter? Still waiting for you to prove these bold assertions. I wait with baited breath, though I'm sure I set myself up for disappointment.
    He's attacking Israel instead of doing his job. That shows support for terrorists. He's attacking Israel instead of working with to disarm Iran. That makes him a terrorist.

    Now stop with your psycho-babble.

    El Baradei supports Iran:

    ElBaradei Downplays Uranium Find in Iran

    The European Union heads into Monday Iran Rejects Incentives in order to entice Iran from its nuclear program and uranium enrichment activities. But before even making it to the table, Iran has rejected it, reminding once again that its nuclear program is not for sale, regardless of economic and security incentives that may be offered it by Friday of this week. Offers to Iran have been made for nearly two years, all of them summarily dismissed. They simply are not interested.

    Last week’s revelation that equipment from Iran’s razed Lavizan plant tested positively for highly enriched uranium could prove quite problematic for the persistent Iranian regime. While Ahmadinejad has outright denied the test results are true, it is expected that Iran will eventually claim that the equipment swabbed by the IAEA was used and that the residue of HEU trace back to the equipment’s origin, Pakistan.

    While that may prove true, just as did the tested samples from Natanz earlier, it puts Iran’s denial that its military is involved in their clandestine nuclear program squarely on its head, as the Lavizan site was a military facility, also suspected of carrying out explosives tests consistent with testing nuclear detonators.

    For the IAEA’s part, Iran’s state-run media arm, IRNA, noted that IAEA head Mohamad ElBaradei has already said the HEU find was of little significance and likely traceable to Pakistani centrifuges again.

    Full Article: http://threatswatch.org/inbrief/2006...ys-uranium-fi/

    ElBaradei CANNOT be allowed to muddy the message about the threat posed by Iran's nuclear program. He is trying to do exactly that! Therefore, he clearly has sided with the terrorist government of Iran. This makes his a terrorist.
    Last edited by Vader; 10-07-09 at 04:51 PM.

  6. #96
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report

    Quote Originally Posted by Vader View Post
    He's attacking Israel instead of doing his job. That shows support for terrorists. He's attacking Israel instead of working with to disarm Iran. That makes him a terrorist.

    Now stop with your psycho-babble.
    ...
    ElBaradei CANNOT be allowed to muddy the message about the threat posed by Iran's nuclear program. He is trying to do exactly that! Therefore, he clearly has sided with the terrorist government of Iran. This makes his a terrorist.
    I'm sorry I frankly, having studied nuclear deterrence theory think that Iran has the right to deter a nuclear strike from Israel. This will keep either side from launching a nuke. Iran will not be able to launch a nuke without a guaranteed strike by a nuclear Israel. Neither side can fire. Two bad countries with bad nukes is better than one bad country with a nuke.( I studied it years ago Im prolly rusty but the concept is basic ) Sounds to me like alot of things people say around you probably strikes you as support for terrorists.

  7. #97
    Filmmaker Lawyer Patriot
    Harshaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:28 PM
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    29,566

    Re: ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    I'm sorry I frankly, having studied nuclear deterrence theory think that Iran has the right to deter a nuclear strike from Israel. This will keep either side from launching a nuke. Iran will not be able to launch a nuke without a guaranteed strike by a nuclear Israel. Neither side can fire. Two bad countries with bad nukes is better than one bad country with a nuke.( I studied it years ago Im prolly rusty but the concept is basic ) Sounds to me like alot of things people say around you probably strikes you as support for terrorists.
    This is preposterous.

    This assumes that without a nuclear deterrent holding Israel in check, they're an offensive nuclear threat.

    Yet, if they do have nukes, they've had them for decades, with no neighbors having a nuclear deterrent against them.

    If they were an offensive threat, we'd know by now. This moral equivalence game is sheer buffoonery.
    “Offing those rich pigs with their own forks and knives, and then eating a meal in the same room, far out! The Weathermen dig Charles Manson.”-- Bernadine Dohrn

  8. #98
    free market communist
    Gardener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    09-30-17 @ 12:27 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    26,661

    Re: ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    I'm sorry I frankly, having studied nuclear deterrence theory think that Iran has the right to deter a nuclear strike from Israel. This will keep either side from launching a nuke. Iran will not be able to launch a nuke without a guaranteed strike by a nuclear Israel. Neither side can fire. Two bad countries with bad nukes is better than one bad country with a nuke.( I studied it years ago Im prolly rusty but the concept is basic ) Sounds to me like alot of things people say around you probably strikes you as support for terrorists.
    You haven't really kept up have you?

    Rafsanjani laid out the Mullah point of view several years ago in regards to nuking Israel. The Mullah point of view is that the potential cost of retaliation is worth it as they can wipe out the Jews, but the Jews cannot prevent the Ummah from eventual triumph.
    "you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos

  9. #99
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    In your dreams...
    Last Seen
    05-29-12 @ 02:53 PM
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    10,621

    Re: ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report

    Quote Originally Posted by Gardener View Post
    You haven't really kept up have you?

    Rafsanjani laid out the Mullah point of view several years ago in regards to nuking Israel. The Mullah point of view is that the potential cost of retaliation is worth it as they can wipe out the Jews, but the Jews cannot prevent the Ummah from eventual triumph.
    I need a source on that. plz.

    This is preposterous.

    This assumes that without a nuclear deterrent holding Israel in check, they're an offensive nuclear threat.

    Yet, if they do have nukes, they've had them for decades, with no neighbors having a nuclear deterrent against them.

    If they were an offensive threat, we'd know by now. This moral equivalence game is sheer buffoonery.
    It's not preposterous its a squarely laid out theory. HAVING NUKES AND BUILDING AN INFASTRUCTURE WITH A POTENTIAL TO STRIKE ANOTHER NATION is a threat to the other nation. Youre calling everything humans know about nuclear conflict from the cold war to be preposterous.

    Its kindof like ...if Iran acquires a nuke it will be one of the 'respectable' nations that cannot be invaded by the other 'respectable' nations. Nations acquire nuclear weapons for the economic benefits of structurally adding the people and logistics (educational and economical) to provide for a nuclear infrastructure, and even moreso a nuclear infrastructure that can issue a nuclear response once an attack has been made.

    I do not accuse Israel of wanting to nuke its neighbors, your assumption is buffoonery it is not about the moral equivalence of 'if you gottem, I gottem' theres alot more that goes into the acquisition of a nuclear deterrent than just the animosty towards other nations you see in the news. Having a nuke means Iran wont just be an invade-able chunk of meat on some strategists table.

    And why would Iran listen to the USA about not getting a nuke, the US broke the non-proliferation treaty and escalated the nuclear arms standoff between pakistan and India if I remember correctly.

    From what is known about nukes you can only nuke countries that don't have them. If you're gonna convince me that the leaders of iran would sacrifice their own people in a nuclear war i would need a source. Until then I will assume no nation is irrational enough to use a nuke on another state with deterrent response capabilities.

  10. #100
    free market communist
    Gardener's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Last Seen
    09-30-17 @ 12:27 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    26,661

    Re: ElBaradei says nuclear Israel number one threat to Mideast: report

    Quote Originally Posted by SE102 View Post
    I need a source on that. plz.



    .
    while providing none whatsoever yourself, I might point out.


    RAFSANJANI SAYS MUSLIMS SHOULD USE NUCLEAR WEAPON AGAINST ISRAL
    "you're better off on Stormfront discussing how evil brown men are taking innocent white flowers." Infinite Chaos

Page 10 of 18 FirstFirst ... 89101112 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •