Page 14 of 16 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 153

Thread: US Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Second Amendment forbids local handgun bans

  1. #131
    Dispenser of Negativity
    Cold Highway's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Newburgh, New York and World 8: Dark Land
    Last Seen
    12-24-12 @ 11:21 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    9,596
    Blog Entries
    7

    Re: US Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Second Amendment forbids local handgun

    Quote Originally Posted by American View Post
    Are they putting registration numbers on weapons now?
    In NY they are attempting to pass a law that requires stamping ammo.
    Jackboots always come in matched pairs, a left boot and a right boot.

  2. #132
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Last Seen
    12-26-10 @ 06:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    8,083

    Re: US Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Second Amendment forbids local handgun

    Quote Originally Posted by Goobieman View Post
    Who argued that?
    I got my terminology wrong. I meant the serial number... so that in the case of a murder, the manufacturer can be approached and the sale traced to the suspect. I didn't realize that's how it worked. I thought all guns were registered in a different way.

    Nevermind then. No to registration.

  3. #133
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: US Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Second Amendment forbids local handgun

    Quote Originally Posted by Orius View Post
    I got my terminology wrong. I meant the serial number... so that in the case of a murder, the manufacturer can be approached and the sale traced to the suspect. I didn't realize that's how it worked. I thought all guns were registered in a different way.
    Thats what I thought you meant.

  4. #134
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Naperville, IL
    Last Seen
    09-24-12 @ 02:14 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    11,963

    Re: US Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Second Amendment forbids local handgun

    Quote Originally Posted by chevydriver1123 View Post
    In NY they are attempting to pass a law that requires stamping ammo.
    Good. I wish they'd do that in Ca.

  5. #135
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!
    stevenb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Gilbert, Az
    Last Seen
    11-28-09 @ 08:32 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    1,560

    Re: US Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Second Amendment forbids local handgun

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
    Good. I wish they'd do that in Ca.
    So.. basically what will happen is people will drive to AZ, Utah, or Nevada and buy ammo.


    YAY for more stupid laws that noone will follow other than law abiding citizens.

    Your ignorance and naivety is ****ing outrageous.
    George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to win the war with Britain... He shot them.

  6. #136
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Naperville, IL
    Last Seen
    09-24-12 @ 02:14 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    11,963

    Re: US Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Second Amendment forbids local handgun

    Quote Originally Posted by ConservaBill View Post
    BTW.. Assault weapons have been banned since the early '80's!

    Once that was done, then they redefined "assault weapon" to basically cover any scary looking rifle...

    Now, once they got those taking care of (confiscated) then grandpa's 1903 bolt-action is next "assault rifle" and so on until the TYRANTS have nothing standing in there way..

    ALL of these anti-gun arguments are simply regurgitating the rhetoric provided by those same TYRANTS... I think they are called "useful Idiots"
    See, here's the problem with overzealous gun rights advocates: It's always "THEY". This big ol' scary THEY is going to come into their house and take away guns...

    The Federal Ban is very specific. What legitimate purpose would a gun owner have for a fully-automatic M16 except to get his lame rocks off showing it to his redneck friends.

    The overzealous types are so caught up in owning the banned guns because it's their RIGHT. That's called reading the second amendment through a keyhole, totally disregarding 200 years of advances in firearms technology, gun ownership trends, and the huge illegal gun black marked used by felons.

    Assault Weapons definitions and laws differ state to state. So who is the THEY you are taking about. What state/county do you live in??

  7. #137
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!
    stevenb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Gilbert, Az
    Last Seen
    11-28-09 @ 08:32 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    1,560

    Re: US Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Second Amendment forbids local handgun

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
    See, here's the problem with overzealous gun rights advocates: It's always "THEY". This big ol' scary THEY is going to come into their house and take away guns...

    The Federal Ban is very specific. What legitimate purpose would a gun owner have for a fully-automatic M16 except to get his lame rocks off showing it to his redneck friends.

    The overzealous types are so caught up in owning the banned guns because it's their RIGHT. That's called reading the second amendment through a keyhole, totally disregarding 200 years of advances in firearms technology, gun ownership trends, and the huge illegal gun black marked used by felons.

    Assault Weapons definitions and laws differ state to state. So who is the THEY you are taking about. What state/county do you live in??

    What legitimate purpose would a liberal need to set the flag on fire for?

    The second amendment is very plain and simple, much like the first.

    Maybe you guys should take an english class or two... So that you may fully grasp it.
    George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to win the war with Britain... He shot them.

  8. #138
    Banned Goobieman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Last Seen
    03-22-15 @ 02:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    17,343

    Re: US Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Second Amendment forbids local handgun

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
    The Federal Ban is very specific. What legitimate purpose would a gun owner have for a fully-automatic M16 except to get his lame rocks off showing it to his redneck friends.
    And there's the problem with overzealous anti-gun rights loons:
    They dont know what they're talking about.

    -There is no federal ban on M16s or 'assaul weapons'.
    -An M16, any other assault rifle, and any 'assault weapon' is perfectly capable of being effectively used for any legitimate use someone might have for a gun

    This lack of knowledge - this objective ignorance of the subject material - forces the anti-gun rights loons base their arguments on hyperbole and ad homs. These arguments, so based, necessarily fail; a fact ignored by the anti-gun rights loons as indicated by their failure to intelligently and effectively defend their arguments

    The overzealous types are so caught up in owning the banned guns because it's their RIGHT. That's called reading the second amendment through a keyhole, totally disregarding 200 years of advances in firearms technology, gun ownership trends, and the huge illegal gun black marked used by felons.
    This is an example of the objectively ignorant anti-gun rights loon using the 'technology' argument. Said objectively ignorant anti-gun loons inevitably ignore questions about their reasoning behind this argument, especially once it is pointed out that while they did not exist 200 years ago, CNN is still protected by the 1st amendment, and their phone conversations are still protected by the 4th.

  9. #139
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:57 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,356

    Re: US Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Second Amendment forbids local handgun

    Quote Originally Posted by hazlnut View Post
    Good. I wish they'd do that in Ca.
    Then, when ammo gets stolen from someone's private stock, that person will get fingered, wrongly, for the murder. Meanwhile, the actual murderer will be getting that much farther away from the grasp of justice.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  10. #140
    ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ!
    stevenb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Gilbert, Az
    Last Seen
    11-28-09 @ 08:32 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    1,560

    Re: US Supreme Court agrees to decide whether Second Amendment forbids local handgun

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Then, when ammo gets stolen from someone's private stock, that person will get fingered, wrongly, for the murder. Meanwhile, the actual murderer will be getting that much farther away from the grasp of justice.
    Nevermind the fact that most projectiles get so mangled in the body they're pretty hard to identify let alone read microscopic serial numbers on.
    George Washington didn't use his freedom of speech to win the war with Britain... He shot them.

Page 14 of 16 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •