• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iran flexes muscle ahead of talks with major powers

Guys, it wasn't much of a muscle flex, and Obama is bluffing with Iran to make reconsider about going ahead with their nuclear power. So don't say he isn't doing enough, because really another war is the last thing we need, and I do believe Iran wants nuclear power for power more than anything else.
 
Dear Oftencold,

I have implemented changes that I believe will bring hope and change...to the hope and change that we all hope will change. Now...I can understand your dismay...but...the hope and change, that I feel are necessary...are the hope and change that I hopefully feel you must change for there to be any change in the hope we can all change to...hopefully.

Your absolute joke of a President,

Barack head circus clown Obama.
Oh, another wit-meister! I'll look for more of your stuff!
 
and I do believe Iran wants nuclear power for power more than anything else.

No doubt the secret facility they have just admitted to leads you to believe this. I mean, if you're going to build it to keep your lights on and your heat working....it makes sense to bury it and lie about it for years.

But, I like your thinking, I think Obama could use it for bombing excuses. We could say...we wanted to provide enough light for them to work in the dark realizing their economy had issues, that energy was the big crisis and that's why they're hiding and spinning uranium. How nice are we that we would use some of our more sophisticated ordinance to light up the Iranian skies over Bushewr or Natanz....or our new lil find.
 
No doubt the secret facility they have just admitted to leads you to believe this. I mean, if you're going to build it to keep your lights on and your heat working....it makes sense to bury it and lie about it for years.

But, I like your thinking, I think Obama could use it for bombing excuses. We could say...we wanted to provide enough light for them to work in the dark realizing their economy had issues, that energy was the big crisis and that's why they're hiding and spinning uranium. How nice are we that we would use some of our more sophisticated ordinance to light up the Iranian skies over Bushewr or Natanz....or our new lil find.
Yeah, we could bomb it and just say we wanted to find out if it was really bombproof. :mrgreen:
 
Yeah, we could bomb it and just say we wanted to find out if it was really bombproof. :mrgreen:

I like that! We could say we were merely testing what kind of ordinance would be necessary given how bombproof it really is.
 
As I was saying, the error was in your computer kiddo.

Repetition of that makes it seem as though it might be more than just your CPU that needs repairs. :2wave:

Are those facts?
The fact that Israel is a Liberal Democracy is quite known to anyone with any shard of knowledge on the subject, I'm astonished that you were unaware of it so far.

Liberal democracies tend to avoid "discrimination on the grounds of gender, religion, nationality, race, ethnic group, country of origin or any other irrelevant factor," do they not? Why then was it that the Knesset's Constitution, Law, and Justice Committee removed that very clause from the final draft of the Basic Law on Human Dignity and Freedom, attempting to emphasize the specifically Jewish identity of a state that prides itself on the supremacy of a specific ethnic/religious group in an arrangement not observed in legitimate liberal democracies? More importantly, as I mentioned, a state's internal domestic conditions are immaterial to the question of whether its ruling administration is responsible for the exportation of authoritarian or otherwise unethical international policies.

Which is entirely wrong and has no truth to it, considering that the US's foreign policy adopts morality whenever it is in the state of war, which cannot honestly be said for the other side, ehm?

This is almost as comical as your laughable claim that CIA agents have a "vested interest" in the preservation of democracy. U.S. political regimes have routinely committed unjust and anti-democratic international actions, and U.S. ruling administrations have traditionally been and continue to be among the foremost of political regimes directly or indirectly responsible for anti-democratic coups and support of dictatorial political conditions throughout the world. This pattern has been particularly stark in Latin America, with the CIA-backed removals of democratically elected leftists Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala and Salvador Allende in Chile (who was to be replaced by the brutal military dictator Augusto Pinochet), and support of the Contras and the Somoza family of Nicaragua, Manuel Noriega of Panama, Rafael Trujillo of the Dominican Republic, the Duvalier father and son pair of Haiti, Fulgencio Batista of Cuba, etc. It's also touched the Middle East through the support of the removal of the democratically elected prime minister Mohammed Mossadeq in 1953.
 
Defeats?
As far as I know you too have acknowledged that he has murdered many.
I am just doing my part here pointing out to the mad man work and how many innocents did he and his legion of evil have killed. :)
Who Makhno? I don't think he murdered many at all but I don't see the relevance for this thread?:confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom