Devil505
Banned
- Joined
- Apr 13, 2009
- Messages
- 3,512
- Reaction score
- 315
- Location
- Masschusetts
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Moderate
What you think, and what I think, are obviously not always equitable.
Translation please????
What you think, and what I think, are obviously not always equitable.
Wilson called Obama a liar.
You got it...Thanks!
Simple. Stop trying to use my post for your partisanship games.Translation please????
I haven't read through all the postings as there are just too many, but if Jimmy Carter, of all people, is going to advance the notion of "where there is smoke, there is fire", does that mean he is finally admitting his own ethnic bias?
Much of this entire thread is a heated rant against Mr. Carter's right to have such a belief, & nothing more.
Ah, the ever-popular "but he has a RIGHT to say it!!!!!!!!!!!!" non-defense against criticism.
Seriously, you people need more than two pages in your playbook.
But he's a liar...right??
(I get it....He's only a liar when he says things you don't agree with...Got it!)
Former President Carter has no right to believe what he wants too?
(if not...whose beliefs is he required to believe?)
I think this whole thread (now 76 pages long) can be summed up in one sentence:
Former President Jimmy Carter believes that much of the anti-Obama rhetoric, hatred & anger has racism as its base.
Much of this entire thread is a heated rant against Mr. Carter's right to have such a belief, & nothing more.
This kind of dishonesty, of course, is why it's pointless to try to debate much of anything with you. Thus, I simply point out your ridiculousness, as is the case here.
Former President Carter has no right to believe what he wants too?
As an ex-President, Carter has no right to share his beliefs/fears with his fellow Americans?
No...It's a very simple question which destroys your argument, so you choose to just make a personal attack instead on answering it.
No...& I don't recall leveling insulting remarks at you, so why do you feel free to insult me?Are you freaking delusional?
Same questionApparently you've moved beyond just twisting people's words to just blatantly making things up now.
Just because YOU see no evidence, does that mean it couldn't exist?I see no evidence that he acted like a racist idiot. And you and the rest of your left wing hacks continue to fail to bring any credible evidence to the table.
I think there are plenty of people here who will say that Obama is a liar when he says things they don't agree with & then call him a liar when he says things they don't agree with.And even if I did call Obama a liar, which I haven't, just becasue a man lies once doesn't mean he can't be truthful on another occasion.
Then he has a right to believe what he said..Thanks for answering that directlySure he can believe whatever he wants.
Absolutely!...That is YOUR right.Just like I have to right to mock each of those beliefs for being completely ridiculous and without any supporting evidence.
Thanks again...I agree with you.He has a right to express himself, just like any other American.
But there is a long standing tradition of former Presidents not getting involved in partisan matters.
I do believe that is true & I believe the reason why you feel debate with me is pointless is that you can't win a debate by making personal attacks, which is your main tactic & therefore you get aggravated at your inability to address the issues..If you actually believe that to be true, then it's doubly apparent why it's pointless to try to debate with you.
I do believe that is true & I believe the reason why you feel debate with me is pointless is that you can't win a debate by making personal attacks, which is you only tactic, & therefore you get aggravated at your inability to address the issues..
Yeah. Meanwhile, no one argued that Carter didn't have the right to his opinion. I certainly didn't and it can't be fairly implied that I did.
See, if you're going to have a meaningful debate with someone, that person needs to have the ability to 1) understand what you're saying, and 2) be honest enough not to twist it and make things up.
You've repeatedly demonstrated that you lack in one or both areas, and have just done so here. Is it more because of one or the other? Don't know, but my suspicion is that your extreme bad faith tends to drive your incomprehension.
So, as I said, no actual debate is even possible with you. (Not that this won't fall on deaf ears like everything else, though.)
I think this whole thread (now 76 pages long) can be summed up in one sentence:
Former President Jimmy Carter believes that much of the anti-Obama rhetoric, hatred & anger has racism as its base.
Much of this entire thread is a heated rant against Mr. Carter's right to have such a belief, & nothing more.
But he's a liar...right??
No problem.
Kindly point out, specifically, where anyone said Carter didn't have the right to his belief. No dodging, no generalities, no distractions, no non-sequiturs -- and no "mind reading," considering that's supposedly taboo. Let's see it.
Jimmy Carter just exposed and spoke straight from his ignorance.
Ludicrous crap like this out o
This is what I mean by irresponsible comments like the one Carter made. When you make wild accusations like Carter did, without any real proof of their validity, people will start to believe it and the word "racist" takes on a whole new and convoluted meaning. People will start to use it in situations when it does not really apply, and that only adds to the problem.
Carter is an old fool, why do they give him a stage in the media?
He should be talking to the walls.
He doesn't seem to have a positive view of Americans to think 'many of them' have a problem with a non white President .... :roll:
He is certainly not a positive person.
'We' are discussing Jimmy Carter, past President of the USA, anti-semite extraordinaire.
.
Here are just a few posts (from the first few pages of this thread) which would tend to show that our belief that former President Carter had a right to express his beliefs is not accepted here & that he (Carter) was viciously attacked for presenting his beliefs kin many of these posts.
Not one of those says he doesn't have the right to do so, nor is it fairly implied.