• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Jimmy Carter: Wilson comments 'based on racism'

I'm not going to respond to questions where the parameters of the debate are set.

But you tried to set the parameters of the debate by saying we couldn't talk about Obama.
 
But you tried to set the parameters of the debate by saying we couldn't talk about Obama.

Are you purposefully playing stupid?

I feel I have to repeat myself...

The wannabe "centrist."

Do the gutless centrists go after the real bad guys, the ones that game the system, play stupid and pimp the most awful sections of U.S. citizenry?

Of course not.

Why?

Because then they couldn't style themselves as centrists anymore, and there's nothing more dear to a centrist's heart than his status as a moderate.
 
Last edited:
Again, I'm not going to respond to your shameless attempt to set the parameters of the debate.

The debate is about racism.

The post I responded to asked:

Where's the evidence that backs up any of the claims of "Racism".

Post them please.

And my response pointed out that as far as racism goes, our recent incidents / accusations that had EVIDENCE, were all on the other side of the fence.

Whoops, turns out the claims with evidence are all coming down on the other side of the fence.

Obama's racist preachers. Obama's racist Green Jobs Czar. Obama's racist Supreme Court appointee.

So, as we can see, my post was right on topic, and your "set parameters" crap is just smokescreen mumbo jumbo.

I reject your entire premise and will not particpate in useless banter with a hyper partisan individual.

You mean you will run away from someone with EVIDENCE for their claims, because it shows up your lack thereof.
 
Only on Planet Gill.

Off topic, but I can't let him get away with this.

A once revered civil rights group named the Southern Poverty Law Center has now become a threat to the freedoms and security of American citizens due to their repeated attacks on all First Amendment rights and their utter debasement of the political process.

Due to the severity of the consequences of the SPLC’s actions on our nation, their well funded and organized repeated attacks on American freedoms of speech, the press, the right to peaceably assemble, and petition the government for a redress of grievances, let us as Americans of every race and creed unify in our calls for the dissolution and complete political destruction of the Southern Poverty Law Center…

While in the past the SPLC has targeted “hate groups” or groups deemed racist and potentially violent, such as the KKK and Neo Nazi groups, the SPLC has recently used their reputation for righting these groups to go after moderate and mainstream Americans, journalists, and show hosts and anchors in an attempt to suppress free speech.

In the SPLC’s world, armies of the night are forever on the march. Cross-burnings, lynchings and rampant racial discrimination are omnipresent. Those who question the SPLC’s approach to race are blacklisted as contemptible bigots.

The center lumps all sorts of groups on America’s political right together, labeling them enemies of the Republic. Conservative, libertarian, anti-tax, immigration reductionist and other groups are all viewed as legitimate targets for vilification.

Big Money

SPLC has an enormous endowment of more than $152 million, according to its 2005 annual report. Its IRS Form 990 for the fiscal year ended Oct. 31, 2005, shows that the center took in gross receipts of $49.8 million that year, $29.7 million of which consisted of contributions and grants.

According to its balance sheet, by Oct. 31, 2005, its total assets had ballooned from $173.2 million at the beginning of the fiscal year, to $189.4 million by year’s end. SPLC’s endowment is so large that it reported endowment income of nearly $3.5 million, including interest income of $728,356.

Dees founded the Southern Poverty Law Center in 1971 with Joseph Levin (who left the SPLC in 1976) and Julian Bond. (Articles of Incorporation. Southern Poverty Law Center, Inc.)

Acted as Chief fundraiser for George McGovern's 1972 presidential campaign in return for the campaign's mailing list. Raised $20 million for McGovern. (Burlington Times, July 30, 1975. The Progressive, July 1988.)

Arrested and removed from court in 1975 for attempting to suborn perjury (bribing a witness) in the Joan Little murder trial in North Carolina. Little, a black convict, was accused of killing a prison guard with an ice-pick . The felony charge against Dees was subsequently dropped, but the presiding judge, Hamilton Hobgood, refused to re-admit Dees to the case. The refusal was upheld on appeal after the Supreme Court of the United States refused to hear Dees appeal. (Ibid.)

"The great untold story of the JoAnn Little trial was the role of the Communist Party, through its National Alliance Against Racist and Political Repression, in controlling the entire political movement surrounding the case. Angela Davis, a leading figure in both organizations became the most frequently quoted movement figure and constant companion of JoAnn Little... Party members were visible and influential on the defense committee, and the party frequently set up rallies of support around the country." (Columbia Journalism Review. Pirsky, Mark. March/April, 1976.)

Let me know if you want more.
 
Translation: I still have nothing so I will try to deflect to this.

I've decided that either this guy is just f'n with everyone and posting in blatantly hypocritical ways just to get people's goats or that he's the angriest person I've ever met. See that hissy fit he through in his other thread when he tried to claim Wilson was a racist through supposition, coincidence, and conjecture because he was in the Sons of the Confederacy or whatever it was at one point? It was pretty epic. But I'm gonna go with the "he's f'n with us option" because otherwise he's making humans look pretty bad.
 
I've decided that either this guy is just f'n with everyone and posting in blatantly hypocritical ways just to get people's goats or that he's the angriest person I've ever met. See that hissy fit he through in his other thread when he tried to claim Wilson was a racist through supposition, coincidence, and conjecture because he was in the Sons of the Confederacy or whatever it was at one point? It was pretty epic. But I'm gonna go with the "he's f'n with us option" because otherwise he's making humans look pretty bad.

Personal shots?

Insults?

The currency of losers.
 
Are you purposefully playing stupid?

I feel I have to repeat myself...

The wannabe "centrist."

Do the gutless centrists go after the real bad guys, the ones that game the system, play stupid and pimp the most awful sections of U.S. citizenry?

Of course not.

Why?

Because then they couldn't style themselves as centrists anymore, and there's nothing more dear to a centrist's heart than his status as a moderate.

This didn't address the point. Again, as I said in your other thread you're gonna want to be careful with that "stupid" stone, make sure your glass house is out of the way before you huck it at someone.
 
the real bad guys, the ones that game the system, play stupid and pimp the most awful sections of U.S. citizenry?
sharpton1.jpg

______________My Nose Was Itching_____________
 
Last edited:
Off topic, but I can't let him get away with this.







Let me know if you want more.

I want you to link that information before I make a comment.
 
Personal shots?

Insults?

The currency of losers.

You do realize that this has been the whole of your posts right? Or is that "stupid" stone coming back at you already?
 
This didn't address the point. Again, as I said in your other thread you're gonna want to be careful with that "stupid" stone, make sure your glass house is out of the way before you huck it at someone.

I believe I have made myself clear as to the type poster you want to be.

No need to further explain myself.
 
I believe I have made myself clear as to the type poster you want to be.

No need to further explain myself.

The only thing you've made clear is your penchant for hypocrisy, unwarranted insult, and horrible debating skills.
 
You do realize that this has been the whole of your posts right? Or is that "stupid" stone coming back at you already?

You can think what you want to think in order to make yourself and the others who have come to the rescue feel better.

Plenty of posters trying so desperately to "win" against me.

Here's a clue.

I do not care, nor am I impressed with how many of you come out of the woodshed to defend each other.

Its absolutely comical that you guys are so worried, so threatened, that you all feel the need to save each others asses.

Keep on piling it on guys, the more of you come the better.

Half a dozen of you, and you still can't close.

Well, put down the coffee guys.

Coffee is for closers.
 
Last edited:
I'm not going to back down on that comment.

If a person thinks Obama is a racist, you are an idiot or a comedian.

So you're admitting to be a loser then, interesting.
 
I'm not going to back down on that comment.

If a person thinks Obama is a racist, you are an idiot or a comedian.

Why then did he go to a racist preacher's church for 20 years ?

Why then did he appoint Sotomayor in spite of her racist comments ?

Why then did he appoint documented race baiter Van Jones as a Green Jobs Czar ?
 
Why then did he go to a racist preacher's church for 20 years ?

Why then did he appoint Sotomayor in spite of her racist comments ?

Why then did he appoint documented race baiter Van Jones as a Green Jobs Czar ?

I told you once, and I am going to tell you for the last time because I have class at 4:45.

I'm not going to respond to questions where you have setup the parameters of the debate.

I reject your entire premise.

It doesn't matter how many times you want to repeat yourself, I will not answer your lame attempts to rig the debate.
 
I'm not going to respond to questions where you have setup the parameters of the debate.

You are going to run away because those are claims with evidence, which show up the unsubstantiated nature of your smear attempts.
 
Does not making sense make you feel better?

You've not made a lick of sense from the start. But you said insults are the currency of losers and you continually use insults. I was asking if you were, by your own "logic", admitting to being a loser. That's all. Jeez, you need to keep your hypocrisy straight. It doesn't say much for you when you seemingly forget what you had written one page earlier.
 
There are more, just google 'Rush Limbaugh racist quotes. I'm not Black, but I find these quotes offensive.
Whaddya know? Google says Obama is a racist too. Must be true:

  1. “White folks greed run a world in need”
  2. "I found solice in nursing a pervasive sense of grievancee and animosity against my mother's race"
  3. “It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned: White people were satisfied so long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves. They were more than satisfied; they were relieved — such a pleasant surprise to find a well-mannered young black man who didn’t seem angry all the time.”
  4. “The point I was making was not that Grandmother harbors any racial animosity. She doesn’t. But she is a typical white person…”

  5. “That’s just how white folks will do you.”
  6. “Historically, African-Americans have turned inward and towards black nationalism whenever they have a sense, as we do now, that the mainstream has rebuffed us, and that white Americans couldn’t care less about the profound problems African-Americans are facing“

  7. "white people — some cruel, some ignorant, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives"
etc.
etc.
 
I've decided that either this guy is just f'n with everyone and posting in blatantly hypocritical ways just to get people's goats or that he's the angriest person I've ever met. See that hissy fit he through in his other thread when he tried to claim Wilson was a racist through supposition, coincidence, and conjecture because he was in the Sons of the Confederacy or whatever it was at one point? It was pretty epic. But I'm gonna go with the "he's f'n with us option" because otherwise he's making humans look pretty bad.

I have to wonder if it isn't someone else we met a while back come back in a different form. Sure sounds like aaronssongs to me.
 
Back
Top Bottom