Page 26 of 27 FirstFirst ... 1624252627 LastLast
Results 251 to 260 of 269

Thread: House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

  1. #251
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Masschusetts
    Last Seen
    03-01-14 @ 09:44 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    3,512

    Re: House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by Blackdog View Post

    Like you had a choice.



    Gloating is bad form & something I didn't do when you apologized to me on an earlier point.
    Additionally I would point out that if Next Extra hadn't saved your butt......You would have lost this debate so.......I should really have conceded to Next Extra!

  2. #252
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Northeast
    Last Seen
    11-03-11 @ 07:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    2,834

    Re: House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by TheNextEra View Post
    In fairness the definition is given as:



    So Oral sex, is still sexual intercourse. I mean, they don't call it oral SEX for nothing
    But the question is in this definition is if the receiver is covered as the one having oral intercourse or instead the giver. I don't know too many people who count getting blowjobs as having sex. Hell you can't fault clinton for thinking like a female but even so this wasn't the definition agreed upon by both the prosecution and the defense.

  3. #253
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Last Seen
    12-10-11 @ 01:19 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    5,122

    Arrow Re: House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

    OMG are we still talking about Clinton ?

    The only way Clinton failed me in that whole deal was not telling Ken Starr to fekk off.

    Can't subpeona a sitting president, gotta impeach first.

    They didn't have the votes.

    Clinton should have told Ken Starr off as the small fry he was, and since he didn't, Clinton weakened the power of the office.

  4. #254
    Guru
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Northeast
    Last Seen
    11-03-11 @ 07:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    2,834

    Re: House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by Voidwar View Post
    OMG are we still talking about Clinton ?

    The only way Clinton failed me in that whole deal was not telling Ken Starr to fekk off.

    Can't subpeona a sitting president, gotta impeach first.

    They didn't have the votes.

    Clinton should have told Ken Starr off as the small fry he was, and since he didn't, Clinton weakened the power of the office.
    Kinda hard to tell off a special prosecutor after he's been appointed. He should have told the republicans to just **** off

  5. #255
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Last Seen
    12-10-11 @ 01:19 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    5,122

    Re: House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by PogueMoran View Post
    Kinda hard to tell off a special prosecutor after he's been appointed.
    No, it is not.

    The man can quite simply send Starr a letter that explains if he is caught on whitehouse grounds the Secret Service has been instructed to kick him in the balls all the way to Washington Avenue.

    What power does Ken have if Bill tells him to go screw ?

    Subpeona power, which does not work on a sitting president.

  6. #256
    King Of The Dog Pound
    Black Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    35,427

    Re: House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by Glinda View Post
    Never said it did. I brought up the republican-sponsored animal-human hybridization bill because I consider it to be a colossal waste of time and money (i.e., the concept originally posited by rudedog, which we are now discussing).
    Are people in the world trying to do this? Are researchers trying to do this?

    We have created human-animal embryos already, say British team - Times Online

    Vault9 Forums > Scientists Mix Human And Animal Dna

    Technology Review: Human-Animal Cybrids

    Does not look like so much of a waist anymore does it?

    Then again your argument for the most part is based in unfounded opinion and not much else.

    Quote Originally Posted by Glinda View Post
    If you believe it's NOT a waste of time and money, please do elaborate. We're all ears.
    See above.

    Quote Originally Posted by Glinda View Post
    Umm? Where did I say or imply that this animal health corridor designation will "out of hand fail financially?"

    I recommend you reread my statement:

    Then think about it a bit more, before wandering even further into Ignorant Debater Land.
    So you did not respond correctly to my initial reply I see. And you have the nerve to claim ignorance on anyone else's part.

    You said...

    "Now, I like animals probably more than the next guy, but please. Is recognizing a geographical region as the national center of the animal health industry that "important?" Really?" - Glinda

    To which I replied...

    "From a financial standpoint for the state? Yes it is.

    Any good publicity for a state generates income in one form or another. Being known as the center of the animal health industry is a good thing. Sort of like silicon vally or wine country for CA etc. It attracts investors etc.
    " - Blackdog

    So you either completely missed my point or are being willfully ignorant. The choice is yours.
    Quote Originally Posted by Absentglare View Post
    You can successfully wipe your ass with toilet paper, that doesn't mean that you should.

  7. #257
    King Of The Dog Pound
    Black Dog's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    South Florida
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    35,427

    Re: House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by Devil505 View Post
    Gloating is bad form & something I didn't do when you apologized to me on an earlier point.
    You try and gloat all the time even though you are wrong, again most of the time.

    Quote Originally Posted by Devil505 View Post
    Additionally I would point out that if Next Extra hadn't saved your butt......You would have lost this debate so.......I should really have conceded to Next Extra!
    You have got to be kidding? The US courts backed up my position even without his definition so you (as usual) are lying.
    Quote Originally Posted by Absentglare View Post
    You can successfully wipe your ass with toilet paper, that doesn't mean that you should.

  8. #258
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Last Seen
    08-29-17 @ 08:28 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Left
    Posts
    16,575

    Re: House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by PogueMoran View Post
    But the question is in this definition is if the receiver is covered as the one having oral intercourse or instead the giver. I don't know too many people who count getting blowjobs as having sex. Hell you can't fault clinton for thinking like a female but even so this wasn't the definition agreed upon by both the prosecution and the defense.
    Intercourse is between two (or in some cases multiple) people. You can't say the guy had sex but the woman didn't sorry, but it doesn't work that way.

    There is a reason it is called oral SEX, it is STILL SEX.
    Last edited by TheNextEra; 09-18-09 at 09:10 PM.

  9. #259
    Sage
    scourge99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    The Wild West
    Last Seen
    01-27-12 @ 01:50 AM
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    6,233

    Re: House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by F107HyperSabr View Post
    House passes resolution criticizing Wilson - CNN.com
    House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

    The House of Representatives on Tuesday formally admonished Republican Rep. Joe Wilson for shouting "you lie" during President Obama's speech to a joint session of Congress last week.

    I do not think that this was needed but I understand why they formally admonished this sorry excuse for a Congressman. If he really did apologize as a gentleman instead of bragging that he was forced into an apology I do not think that the House would have taken this action.

    Do you guys hink that this piece Congressional trash was worth the time to formally admonish ?
    I'm wondering what earmarks were attached to the resolution.
    If you believe in the Supernatural then you can become a millionaire!

    Questioning or criticizing another's core beliefs is inadvertently perceived as offensive and rude.

  10. #260
    Stabler Genius
    MSgt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    London
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 09:34 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    19,722

    Re: House passes resolution criticizing Wilson

    Quote Originally Posted by PogueMoran View Post
    I don't know too many people who count getting blowjobs as having sex.
    Oh god. Ask every single women that has ever caught her man receiving one.

    But here we go, right? An American president receives a blowjob (as if this is really all that went on, right?) and cheats on his wife (the first lady) and his supporters rush to define what is and is not "cheating"...or "intercourse"...or "sex." Get over it. He's not your daddy. He doesn't bring discredit upon your household. And you certianly don't owe him anything. Yet, plenty are willing to redefine their morality over this man whom they have never met.

    So what we have here is people blasting Wilson's idiocy and embarrasssment to nation. People blasting Clinton's idiocy and embarrassment to nation. But both seeking to defend their personal idiot? Would this be that perfect definition of partisan slavery or what?
    Last edited by MSgt; 09-19-09 at 12:28 AM.

    MSgt
    Semper Fidelis
    USMC 1992~2012

Page 26 of 27 FirstFirst ... 1624252627 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •