So Oral sex, is still sexual intercourse. I mean, they don't call it oral SEX for nothing* Main Entry: sexual intercourse
* Function: noun
* Date: 1799
1 : heterosexual intercourse involving penetration of the vagina by the penis : coitus
2 : intercourse (as anal or oral intercourse) that does not involve penetration of the vagina by the penis
You are over simplifying the argument and comparing apples and oranges.
No Lives Matter
Clearly, I'm wasting my time if you're so uninformed about debate that you don't know one of the most basic tenets of the activity.
As for your refusal to answer my question about the "importance" of the animal-human hybridization bill...
Well, I think my work here is done.
I have never seen that definition of sexual intercourse, nor do I think most people would define oral sex as sexual intercourse.
In either case, I will accept the (linked to) definition as real & will concede the point to Harshaw.
Harshaw had the integrity to concede a point to me a while back....so I am hereby returning the favor.
As for your other question about the "animal-human hybridization bill" it has nothing to do with my remarks at all.
So until you can explain why "recognizing a geographical region as having a surplus of veterinary services" (among other things) will out of hand fail financially when it has worked countless times before, and how this makes it comparable to waisting time on bvll**** like the censuring.
No Lives Matter
If you believe it's NOT a waste of time and money, please do elaborate. We're all ears.
I recommend you reread my statement:
Then think about it a bit more, before wandering even further into Ignorant Debater Land.And I seriously doubt that this bill will create an influx of tourist visits to the many veterinarian offices in the region.