• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Filmmaker Demands Apology From ACORN for Claiming Undercover Video 'Doctored'

Scorpion89

Banned
Joined
May 29, 2009
Messages
2,629
Reaction score
527
Gender
Undisclosed
Political Leaning
Undisclosed
Filmmaker Demands Apology From ACORN for Claiming Undercover Video 'Doctored' - Political News - FOXNews.com

The independent filmmaker whose hidden-camera videos prompted the firing of four ACORN workers is demanding an apology from ACORN for calling his work a fabricated "scam" and daring the activist group to take legal action against him.

"Bring it on," filmmaker James O'Keefe said Sunday on FOX News.

That was after ACORN lashed out at O'Keefe, who with his friend Hannah Giles posed as a pimp and prostitute looking to evade the IRS and apply for an illegal housing loan for a brothel. The sting operation caught four ACORN workers in the Baltimore and Washington, D.C., offices appearing to offer their help.

Those workers were subsequently fired, and the U.S. Census Bureau severed ties with ACORN in the wake of the controversy. But ACORN chief organizer Bertha Lewis issued a written statement Saturday saying that while she cannot defend the actions of the workers who were terminated, O'Keefe may have committed a "felony" with his operation. She also threatened legal action against FOX News, which aired the videos but did not produce them.

This is great I hope that ACORN does file a suit so the truth about this group is finally shown in a Court.
 
If there is a criminal investigation the video tape will become evidence.

If it was doctored we will find out.

The truth will set you free
 
What is this facination with with Acorn certain people persons seem to have. Acorns are nuts right. So is it nut gathering that is driving the ones who seem to have gone beyond facination into obsession. Or is it a fetish ?
 
I read that Maryland has a law about taping and recording someone with out consent, I think it should be a crime to give millions to a bunch of criminals like ACORN.
 
I read that Maryland has a law about taping and recording someone with out consent, I think it should be a crime to give millions to a bunch of criminals like ACORN.

WAIT A MINUTE !! Isn't it the film maker who is being accused of doctoring ? Acorn may not be the ROTARY CLUB but are you saying that the CORN leadership are all graduates of the STATE PEN and not PENN STATE ? How many of the total Acorn leadership are convicted criminals ?
 
I read that Maryland has a law about taping and recording someone with out consent, I think it should be a crime to give millions to a bunch of criminals like ACORN.

So you have no respect for the First Amendment (people exercising their freedom of expression by donating to an organization of their choice)?
 
So you have no respect for the First Amendment (people exercising their freedom of expression by donating to an organization of their choice)?

giving taxpayer money is not donating, it is stealing.
 
giving taxpayer money is not donating, it is stealing.

You said, "I read that Maryland has a law about taping and recording someone with out consent, I think it should be a crime to give millions to a bunch of criminals like ACORN."

Now, I'm not sure how the first part of that sentence is related to the second part, but nowhere do I see where you specified "taxpayer money." Sheesh.
 
we see it on this site every day
one side - acorn in this instance - loses the argument
and then changes the subject - often attacking the one who shed the much needed light
 
You said, "I read that Maryland has a law about taping and recording someone with out consent, I think it should be a crime to give millions to a bunch of criminals like ACORN."

Now, I'm not sure how the first part of that sentence is related to the second part, but nowhere do I see where you specified "taxpayer money." Sheesh.
do you think taxpayer money should be given to ACORN?
 
do you think taxpayer money should be given to ACORN?

YES! if acorn is the best value contractor bidding on the federal work to be done
would you prefer the money be spent on a contractor which is less qualified or offers a lesser value to do the government's work
 
do you think taxpayer money should be given to ACORN?

You seem to be trying to help the poster - who has thus far refused to give me a non-evasive answer to a question I posed earlier - continue to evade the question.
 
You seem to be

YOU seem to be avoiding the question once clarified.

Answer Dark Wizard's clarified query or surrender any claim to credibility.
 
would you prefer the money be spent on a contractor which is less qualified or offers a lesser value to do the government's work

Their attempts, organization wide, to facilitate tax fraud and voter registration fraud, are what is at issue, not their efficiency.
 
Their attempts, organization wide, to facilitate tax fraud and voter registration fraud, are what is at issue, not their efficiency.

but they were selected as the best value contractor

much like hailburton

either the selection process is flawed or the options are very limited
 
YOU seem to be avoiding the question once clarified.

Answer Dark Wizard's clarified query or surrender any claim to credibility.

I never got an answer to the question I posed, yet I don't see you going after that poster the way you're going after me. So back off - at least until you choose to be evenhanded about this.
 
I never got an answer to the question I posed, yet I don't see you going after that poster the way you're going after me. So back off - at least until you choose to be evenhanded about this.

Do you not understand a clarification ?

Is it beyond your ken that someone might have just said "money" when they meant "taxpayer money" ?

I knew what the original poster meant, from the context of the thread, even before the clarification. Was this beyond your understanding or do you want to fixate on it to avoid the question the OP obviously meant to ask ?
 
It's real simple... So simple, even half of the partisan liberals out there will get it...

If the tape was was spliced and diced, and was phony as ACORN claims, then how come all those employees were fired?

Doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure this out people.

.
 
YES! if acorn is the best value contractor bidding on the federal work to be done
would you prefer the money be spent on a contractor which is less qualified or offers a lesser value to do the government's work
:confused: wut.

Highest bidding = Best value? Would that make the mafia the best value contractor?
 
What is this facination with with Acorn certain people persons seem to have. Acorns are nuts right. So is it nut gathering that is driving the ones who seem to have gone beyond facination into obsession. Or is it a fetish ?

It's a taxpayer funded operation and I for one don't want MY money going to fund organized crime.
 
So you have no respect for the First Amendment (people exercising their freedom of expression by donating to an organization of their choice)?

lmfao it's a taxpayer funded operation and yes we're against state monopolist theft going to fund organized crime and child molestation rings like ACORN.
 
YES! if acorn is the best value contractor bidding on the federal work to be done
would you prefer the money be spent on a contractor which is less qualified or offers a lesser value to do the government's work

Well it's good to see that you support taxation funded child prostitution rings. Good on you.
 
What is this facination with with Acorn certain people persons seem to have.

FYI: A question is usually completed with a question mark. Anyway…

Our fascination stems from their involvement with the government i.e., they receive millions of tax-payer dollars and are eligible to receive billions more; not to mention the fact that they were supposed to help conduct the census.

When an organization such as this is caught on camera three times helping to facilitate child prostitution it then becomes "fascinating" to people with a functioning brain. That's how politics works, you see.

This concludes our lesson with civics 101. You receive a failing grade.
 
Back
Top Bottom