• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

House plans to admonish Rep. Wilson over insult

I propose a special federal sales tax imposed on Sanctuary Cities.

Whats your idea ?

I think it's a stupid, impossible project & we should use our tax dollars to actually help U.S. taxpayers....like with health care & infrastructure repairs. (I know that's a crazy idea, eh??...spending our tax dollars to put Americans to work & make us healthier....& not hand it to Haliburton, Big Insurance & Exxon-Mobil)
 
Last edited:
I know that's a crazy idea, eh??...spending our tax dollars to put Americans to work & make us healthier

Deporting the uninsured cheap labor pool will do more to put americans back to work and bring up health stats than any other action.
 
What the hell do I care what this one American likes one way or the other ?

Not relevant to the topic at all, just another red herring squirm move.

He isn't just another American..He may well be the GOP's nominee for the presidency in 2012 & why are you unable to debate without anger & personal attack? (have you ever asked yourself that question?...A quick review of some of your posts (to other members as well) discloses a pattern of attack is your usual stock & trade......Why?
 
Last edited:
why are you unable to debate without anger & personal attack? (have you ever asked yourself that question?...A quick review of some of your posts (to other members as well) discloses a pattern of attack is your usual stock & trade......Why?

I did not attack you, I attacked your debate tactic, this time, an irrelevant Red Herring allusion to Mitt Romney, after you were stuffed on deportation.
 
I did not attack you, I attacked your debate tactic, this time, an irrelevant Red Herring allusion to Mitt Romney, after you were stuffed on deportation.

You consider calling an argument of mine a "Squirm Move" & charging me with Slander are not personal attacks?:lol::lol:

Give me a break! (& those are jut from the first page of your post log.....I have neither the time nor inclination to go further.


just another red herring squirm move.
The evidence for both slanderous claims = ZERO
 
You consider calling an argument of mine a "Squirm Move" & charging me with Slander are not personal attacks?:lol::lol:

Give me a break! (& those are jut from the first page of your post log.....I have neither the time nor inclination to go further.

You will call anything a personal attack to escape the stomping you are recieving on all of these Wilson Threads.

The post you whined about, did not contain personal attacks, but rather an accurate description of your prior post as a Red Herring Squirm move, because it WAS a red herring, and you WERE squirming away from getting stuffed on deportation.
 
charging me with Slander are not personal attacks?:lol::lol:

What is worth the "LOL"'s here is the fact that you don't even understand that you were not the author of either of those claims, so the charge was not leveled at you.
 
What is worth the "LOL"'s here is the fact that you don't even understand that you were not the author of either of those claims, so the charge was not leveled at you.


Look pal...You obviously are determined to just continue your childish personal attacks as your debate style & I specifically said you do this with others too...Not just with me:

.A quick review of some of your posts (to other members as well) discloses a pattern of attack is your usual stock & trade......Why?

So I am done with you & I suggest other should not waste their time as well.:2wave:
 
Unsubstantiated.



Whatever it costs to get the law enforced.

Nothing unsubstantiated about it I bet if I go through your posts I won't find one thing about illegal immigrants being a problem when Republicans were president.

Okay so if we raise your taxes another 20% to fix this problem you won't mind right?
 
Avoiding the question. Shall I repost mine or ignore yours ?:roll:

You've always avoided my questions and yet you expect me to answer yours sorry I'm not going to be your monkey
 
If that is the case, why don't you show where ?

Why don't you quote me "forgetting something" ? :roll:

Hard to quote something that you've forgotten now is it void. You rail about democrats but were you as pissed when reagan granted amnesty?
 
I propose a special federal sales tax imposed on Sanctuary Cities.

Whats your idea ?

Aww so a special tax on certain cities when you're the one who wants this. How about a special tax on individuals for the total and complete deportation so then we can make up for the loss that our economy will take from the deportation of these illegals
 
Deporting the uninsured cheap labor pool will do more to put americans back to work and bring up health stats than any other action.

Not even close Americans aren't going to take getting paid under minimum wage like undocumented workers do. You're going to take away a labor pool that does jobs ordinary americans won't how exactly do you propose replacing them? Call for higher wages for those jobs or lower the minimum wage?
 
Do you people realize that there's been nearly 1500 post made on 3 different threads addressing this completely insignificant issue?

Is some congressman calling the president a liar, really worth this kind of attention with everything else thats happening in the world today?

Sorry, I just had to get that off my chest.

.
 
Look pal...You obviously are determined to just continue your childish personal attacks as your debate style & I specifically said you do this with others too...Not just with me:

I took apart your arguments.
 
Nothing unsubstantiated about it I bet if I go through your posts I won't find one thing about illegal immigrants being a problem when Republicans were president.

Until you do, it remains, UNSUBSTANTIATED. Look it up.

Okay so if we raise your taxes another 20% to fix this problem you won't mind right?

If every dollar goes to deportation, I reckon it'll be over in a year and a half, so fine.

A 20% increase in federal revenues ? Do you know how many Vans and Zip-Ties one can buy for that kind of money ?
 
Last edited:
Hard to quote something that you've forgotten now is it void.

That is not you showing where, now is it ?

You were challenged to provide evidence for yet another of your unsubstantiated claims, and again you could not.
 
Last edited:
Until you do, it remains, UNSUBSTANTIATED. Look it up.



If every dollar goes to deportation, I reckon it'll be over in a year and a half, so fine.

A 20% increase in federal revenues ? Do you know how many Vans and Zip-Ties one can buy for that kind of money ?

You seriously haven't thought this through. It's more than just vans even though busses would be more effective but if you want to talk vans okay.

So lets see 12 million immigrants at most a super van that fits 10 that is 1.2 million vans. Lets go with a dodge sprinter average cost new $38,580. That comes to $46,296,000,000. Now hiring all the personel lets say 1 for every 3 immigrants. You can't expect the cops to be pulled off their normal jobs to do the deportation so then you'd need about 4 million people which you can later use for border patrol which is what I'm assuming you'll do. Average cop would be making 40,000 starting so thats 160 billion there but you said a year and a half so then that would come out to 240. And you'll have to room those guards which will be more money and then house the illegals because its going to take more than 1 day drive in most places. Gas: the vans get about 25 mpg average with 26 gallon fuel tank. Lets take some of the big cities from NYC to the border its about 1700 miles its going to take about 2.6 fuel tanks thats about using a very conservative price of 2.65 a gallon that's $179 each van. In 2007 there were about 400,000 illegal immigrants in NYC so that would come out to about 7.16 million just for NYC in gas. You're also going to have to hire people to search for all these illegal aliens which will take quite some time. Now after transportation is complete I'm assuming you're going to want to keep them out so what do we do? Build a border wall? How much money do you think that'll cost? Plus maintenance, etc, guards. So then we'll be close to 500 billion plus before the job is done. But you're okay with the higher taxes for something that doesn't personall affect you
 
That is not you showing where, now is it ?

You were challenged to provide evidence for yet another of your unsubstantiated claims, and again you could not.

Again if you're forgotten something its hard for me to pull something out of thin air if you've forgotten it. Again no railing against Reagan's amnesty of Illegal Immigrants. Searched quite a few of your posts no mention of it
 
Last edited:
Again if you're forgotten something its hard for me to pull something out of thin air if you've forgotten it. Again no railing against Reagan's amnesty of Illegal Immigrants. Searched quite a few of your posts no mention of it
This website didn't exist in the 80's. What railing are you trying to find? Should Reagan have given amnesty to the illegals then? No it was a mistake. I think he was dupe like many by the argument for it. Was that the first time amnesty was given? Well I don't know, but it is probably the first that matters since Kennedy pushed through the immigration bill back in the mid-60's in an attempt to expand immigration away from quotas.


Amnesty for illegal aliens - THE AMERICAN RESISTANCE FOUNDATION

Kennedy 'fashioned the modern day' immigration system - USATODAY.com
 
This website didn't exist in the 80's. What railing are you trying to find? Should Reagan have given amnesty to the illegals then? No it was a mistake. I think he was dupe like many by the argument for it. Was that the first time amnesty was given? Well I don't know, but it is probably the first that matters since Kennedy pushed through the immigration bill back in the mid-60's in an attempt to expand immigration away from quotas.


Amnesty for illegal aliens - THE AMERICAN RESISTANCE FOUNDATION

Kennedy 'fashioned the modern day' immigration system - USATODAY.com

I've mentioned reagan giving amnesty to illegals several times Void hasn't addressed it either time.
 
Back
Top Bottom