Last edited by Taylor; 09-14-09 at 02:54 AM.
Maybe the politicians can think up some interstate commerce laws too so that their distributor friends can also get a cut. It's sounding less and less likely that those same politicians - having created all this power for themselves - would turn around and let joe public grow at home.
Last edited by jr602az; 09-14-09 at 05:34 AM.
Take it from someone who is legally allowed to grow 25 plants in the state of California, its not as glamorous as you are making it out to be. Outdoor grows are wonderful if you have the time and money to put into guaranteeing pests or poachers will not effect your harvest. Lots of hard work. And if you are not experienced, it will almost always be a waste of time, relatively speaking.
It is not very unreasonable that the rich should contribute to the public expense, not only in proportion to their revenue, but something more than in that proportion.
"Wealth of Nations," Book V, Chapter II, Part II, Article I, pg.911
Nothing like a good glass of manufactured wine when you unscrew the cap.
The haggardness of poverty is everywhere seen contrasted with the sleekness of wealth, the exhorted labor of some compensating for the idleness of others, wretched hovels by the side of stately colonnades, the rags of indigence blended with the ensigns of opulence; in a word, the most useless profusion in the midst of the most urgent wants.Jean-Baptiste Say
guess that proves i'm not a cork sniffer
and yes, even if that joint is not thai weed, i will smoke it with you ... you won't even have to twist my arm. just don't bogart it or i might twist yours
in this economy, hopefully one of the positive ourcomes will be the diminishment of such affectations