• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama to seal US-UN relationship

Erod said:
Yeah, let's get rid of our nuclear weapons and hope all 500 countries in the world have the integrity to do the same. That will make us safer.

Good lord.
Click to expand...

That is not the suggestion. Quit being so childish.

By the way - there are 9 countries with nuclear weapons, not 500. 5 of them signed the NPT (nuclear nonproliferation treaty), India, Pakistan, Israel and NK have not.

So here's a great idea. Let's make more or just leave it at X,000 missiles and and so should the 4 countries that did not sign the treaty. Then they can make tons tons and more tons of nuclear bombs that they will never use on us because they are unstable governments with no order and led by loonies.

I mean, MAD (mutually assured destruction)
 
Erod said:
Like....they wouldn't dream of doing that to the U.S. because we'd incinerate them within the hour. And if it weren't for the U.S. and its nukes, Georgia wouldn't exist, nor would Israel.
Click to expand...

Yeah just like no one would fly airplanes into buildings or blow them selves up. Because they'd be incinerated within a second.

You can't say "terrorists will do anything to kill us" and then tell me you enjoy the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Holy Christ almighty help me through the day.
 
Kandahar said:
I'm only going to post this once, since talking with you is always like talking to a brick wall, and frankly I'd much rather discuss the issue with Ethereal than with you (which is why my comment was addressed to him and not you).
Click to expand...
Here...hold on to this pile of "I really dont care" until it soaks iin really good...

This really boils down to game theory, so let's make a list of the rules for nuclear deterrence...
Click to expand...
I'll stop you right there.
You're deliberately setting up the parameters of you premise so that they support your conclusion -- otherwise known as a strawman.

Nice try. Do better next time.
 
Goobieman said:
I'll stop you right there.
You're deliberately setting up the parameters of you premise so that they support your conclusion -- otherwise known as a strawman.

Nice try. Do better next time.
Click to expand...

I knew you would respond with something asinine instead of addressing the post. If it was anyone else, I'd be inclined to explain it in further detail. But I know perfectly well that you'll respond with something retarded no matter how clearly I explain it, and as such, I'm not going to bother. ;)
 
JakeFromWI said:
Yeah just like no one would fly airplanes into buildings or blow them selves up. Because they'd be incinerated within a second.

You can't say "terrorists will do anything to kill us" and then tell me you enjoy the proliferation of nuclear weapons. Holy Christ almighty help me through the day.
Click to expand...

Not talking about terrorists. You mentioned Russia. If Russia attacked out borders.......boom.
 
Kandahar said:
And living in a house filled with gas probably makes people more careful about starting fires. Just the same, I'd rather live in a house that is NOT filled with gas.
Click to expand...

I suppose. I was just interjecting, is all. Nuclear weapons do serve a purpose, albeit a perverted one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom