- Joined
- Jul 12, 2005
- Messages
- 36,913
- Reaction score
- 11,283
- Location
- Los Angeles, CA
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Centrist
And how is driving at 90 mph while drunk-texting not doing the same thing? It's a completely victimless crime as long as you don't have an accident. So why is it illegal?
It's the difference between immediate threat of harm and your flimsy "possibility that every single person won't pay their debt". It's a retarded comparison.
Like I mentioned earlier in this thread, in the Massachusetts health system, they make exceptions for wealthy people who are able to "self-insure." I'm not opposed to a similar exemption nationwide.
No, you just choose to ignore the obvious parallel.
I know what parallel you were attempting to draw. I stand by my assessment that it was an asinine attempt to relate two completely unrelatable things.