• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Obama adviser Van Jones resigns amid controversy

Wrong the first time there every were any Czars was under Mr. Reagan you want another History Lesson. I have alway been against the Czars hell I'm against the Two Party System it is in clear violation of the US Const. and the Bill of Rights.

Lets see so how many were confirmed by the Sen. and the House oh that's right noneof them were confirmed by the House were they so no the correct answer is that none of them were confirmed by this Congress. It takes both the House and Sen. to confirm a Cabinet Position.
:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:wow you are grossly misinformed. Just because Reagan made a Drug Czar doesn't make him the inventor of it. The term Czar has been used by the Media to describe political appointees since the 1940s. My god do you ever do your research?

Hmm I don't hear much complaining about all Bush's czars even when its been breached. Did you fail Civics in High School? The house doesn't confirm appointments that's the job of the senate. Good god

Article 2 section 2
“he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law:"

No mention of the house
 
Last edited:
You said the Beer photo op would not happen. That the police officer would not let Obama use him as a tool. That he would make a stand and repudiate the president by standing him up.

Yet there he was, helping the crippled professor down the stairs, and having suds with the President.

I like you prof. I enjoy reading your wacky posts.

But your biggest problem is the same it has been since I first started enjoying your zany 'shorthands.'

You're too biased towards your own views. You write for your own emotional agenda and it is obvious.

You fall in love with your own texts. It hinders any ability you may have to view events objectively, neutrally and dispassionately.

You've been saying the healthcare debate has been over, for what, two months now?

It is akin to predicting the world is going to end every day for the next 5 billion years, until the sun finally explodes, and then shouting "See, I told you I was right!"

so, your response to questions raised about baucus and committee and cbo and bluedogs and presidential leadership and the whip's precise disposition relative to a public option is, as always, professor gates?

LOLOLOL!

and, according to you, sgt crowley was used as a tool by the prez?

LOLOLOL!

the prez exited the prof vs po po soap opera a POLITICAL WINNER cuzza a glass of BEER?

LOLOLOL!

because you REALLY know what you're talking about?

concerning UNITED STATES politics?

LOL!

what about the COMMITTEE, silly?

don't they get any BEER?

why can't energy-commerce have a PHOTO OP?

oh, yeah, they did, it was really ugly

"i've been lied to," remember?

charlie melancon, complaining about chairman waxman

you don't KNOW waxman, limit

you never even HEARD OF melancon

HERE, once more, is the source of your IGNORANCE concerning american politics

a whole lot more has gone on than crowley getting used like a tool at your single favorite moment of the obama presidency, the BEER OP

LOLOLOL!

why is the public option dead, limit?

or is it?

LOL!

why can't the president MAKE UP HIS MIND?

why does he VACILLATE more than CARTER?

do you really expect bluedogs to stick out their necks for a president who on sunday, only 3 days before HIS joint session (he's the one who called it) still can't even say WHO'S GONNA WRITE THE BILL?

let alone what it's gonna look like

let alone how he's gonna pay

why did the townhalls turn so ugly?

astroturf?

LOLOLOL!

nazi mobs?

van jones has MEANING, chin stroker, in the CONTEXT of UNITED STATES politics overall

the THEME of the jones story is---the prez was a fool to hire him, the prez lost credibility

obama's JUDGEMENT has ONCE MORE been called into question

do you think the hiring and firing of van jones made the prez look good?

you never answered me (typically)

instead, you once more went into your MIND READING mode

LOLOL!

WHAT is baucus sposed to make of van jones?

what's durbin gonna think?

ross?

conrad?

WHO IS conrad, limit?

THE LIMIT DOES NOT EVEN KNOW WHO SENATOR CONRAD IS

sorry

i'm gratified that you like me, tho

LOLOLOL!
 
Last edited:
He resigned.

He wasn't fired.

LOLOLOL!

sure, he did, limit

van jones RESIGNED

at MIDNITE

in the middle of a holiday weekend

LOLOL!

as if his resigning in disgrace to try to protect the loser idiot who made the colossal error of judgement in hiring him in the first place---as compared to his getting fired---would change the MEANING of what happened a michelob

LOLOL!

can i get you A BEER?
 
so, your response to questions raised about baucus and committee and cbo and bluedogs and presidential leadership and the whip's precise disposition relative to a public option is, as always, professor gates?

LOLOLOL!

and, according to you, sgt crowley was used as a tool by the prez?

LOLOLOL!

the prez exited the prof vs po po soap opera a POLITICAL WINNER cuzza a glass of BEER?

LOLOLOL!

because you REALLY know what you're talking about?

concerning UNITED STATES politics?

LOL!

what about the COMMITTEE, silly?

don't they get any BEER?

why can't energy-commerce have a PHOTO OP?

oh, yeah, they did, it was really ugly

"i've been lied to," remember?

charlie melancon, complaining about chairman waxman

you don't KNOW waxman, limit

you never even HEARD OF melancon

HERE, once more, is the source of your IGNORANCE concerning american politics

a whole lot more has gone on than crowley getting used like a tool at your single favorite moment of the obama presidency, the BEER OP

LOLOLOL!

why is the public option dead, limit?

or is it?

LOL!

why can't the president MAKE UP HIS MIND?

why does he VACILLATE more than CARTER?

do you really expect bluedogs to stick out their necks for a president who on sunday, only 3 days before HIS joint session (he's the one who called it) still can't even say WHO'S GONNA WRITE THE BILL?

let alone what it's gonna look like

let alone how he's gonna pay

why did the townhalls turn so ugly?

astroturf?

LOLOLOL!

nazi mobs?

van jones has MEANING, chin stroker, in the CONTEXT of UNITED STATES politics overall

the THEME of the jones story is---the prez was a fool to hire him, the prez lost credibility

obama's JUDGEMENT has ONCE MORE been called into question

do you think the hiring and firing of van jones made the prez look good?

you never answered me (typically)

instead, you once more went into your MIND READING mode

LOLOL!

WHAT is baucus sposed to make of van jones?

what's durbin gonna think?

ross?

conrad?

WHO IS conrad, limit?

THE LIMIT DOES NOT EVEN KNOW WHO SENATOR CONRAD IS

sorry

i'm gratified that you like me, tho

LOLOLOL!

I have no idea what the hell the above post is supposed to be about.
 
LOLOLOL!

sure, he did, limit

van jones RESIGNED

at MIDNITE

in the middle of a holiday weekend

LOLOL!

as if his resigning in disgrace to try to protect the loser idiot who made the colossal error of judgement in hiring him in the first place---as compared to his getting fired---would change the MEANING of what happened a michelob

LOLOL!

can i get you A BEER?

Hyper partisan nonsense.

And once again, I have no idea what it is you're trying to say.
 
Last edited:
I have no idea what the hell the above post is supposed to be about.

Me either. I've never seen someone laugh at their own jokes so much or laugh after everything they say.
 
Hyper partisan nonsense.

And once again, I have no idea what it is you're trying to say.

if you have no idea what it is i'm trying to say, barrister, then how do you know it's hyper partisan nonsense?

LOLOLOL!

dang, you're easy, dude

i'll PUNCTUATE it for you:

Since you don't know Baucus from your butt, since you have no understanding of Energy-Commerce, since you can't even identify the ubiquitous SIX, since you don't know who testified in THE GATEWAY July 16, let alone what he said and what it means, since you don't even know where is THE GATEWAY, since you have no awareness of the historical evolution of the Bluedogs, for example, which realization is roundly requisite to a real appreciation of how they arrived precisely here from there, since you are totally ignorant about regional realities, since you can't even locate your CBO on your google, since you know nothing about the gripes governors like Gregoire have given voice, plus 100 other gaps in your cognizance, your understanding of United States politics can never rise above kiddie level.

clear enough?
 
Back
Top Bottom