Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 54

Thread: Lockerbie bomber 'set free for oil'

  1. #41
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Last Seen
    12-23-09 @ 05:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    616

    Re: Lockerbie bomber 'set free for oil'

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Who wants to bet that the dude ain't even got cancer?
    there is a 260 pound bodybuilder in a gym i used to go to who is twice as big as everybody else there. when everybody asks him if he takes steroids he says that he has cancer and his doctor prescribes him steroids for it.

    no joke, that's what he says !

    well they may or may not have cancer - both of them. doesn't really matter i think.
    Last edited by NEUROSPORT; 08-31-09 at 08:36 AM.

  2. #42
    Cànan a' Gàidheal
    Anima's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    West Coast of Scotland
    Last Seen
    06-24-12 @ 01:48 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Socialist
    Posts
    1,741

    Re: Lockerbie bomber 'set free for oil'

    Quote Originally Posted by Laila View Post
    Scotland is still in the United Kingdom. What it does affects the rest of the Union in a negative way if it does something as stupid as this. It would be nice if SNP remembers that.
    It looks as if this particular stupid thing was an SNP/Westminster team effort.

    Quote Originally Posted by Laila
    Don't beat him up over it tho
    Westminister is still soverign over the devolved assemblies. It can still take power and besides, SNP probably thought it'd be Scotland getting the investment not UK/England.
    I'm angry, and annoyed. He's made this country look like an ass so Westminster can benefit financially from a better trade link with Libya. Forgetting of course that he's meant to represnt OUR interestsabove all else.

    Quote Originally Posted by Laila
    I didn't defend the release on any grounds but now he is out because MacAsill allowed it. May as well line our coffers
    I only supported himbeing released on compassionate grounds. I suppose it still is compassionate, in a way. He's still very sick. But there's a whole other dimension to this now that I really don't like.
    "I'll govern for all the ambitions of Scotland, and for all of the people who imagine that we can live in a better land. This party, the Scottish party, your party, carries your hope, and we shall carry it carefully, and make the nation proud."
    Alex Salmond, First Minister of Scotland, Scottish National Party

  3. #43
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Past the edge of the universe, through the singularity, and out the other side.
    Last Seen
    09-01-10 @ 05:23 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,324

    Re: Lockerbie bomber 'set free for oil'

    Quote Originally Posted by Laila View Post
    Lockerbie bomber 'set free for oil' - Times Online

    I knew it wasn't on compassionate release and Westminister had a hand to play. I called it from the beginning.
    To bad he's in Libya.

  4. #44
    Sage
    jamesrage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    A place where common sense exists
    Last Seen
    12-10-17 @ 09:23 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Slightly Conservative
    Posts
    31,067

    Re: Lockerbie bomber 'set free for oil'

    Quote Originally Posted by Laila View Post
    Oh no no mass murderer.

    Just invade a country and cause a civil war and oil played a factor along with the lies that was invisible weapons.
    Let me guess you have the nerve to mock Obama birthers and 9-11 truffers?


    Make deals and work with a nation that stone women, rape them and live in the middle ages and it is US money that keeps the regime from falling ...
    I wonder how many corrupt african govts. have trade with US.
    Those nations are doing that to their own people, it is not the same thing as crapping all over victims of a mass murdering terrorist in exchange for oil.

    As i said.
    US would probably do the same thing if oil was in it. This "outrage" is amusing.
    Its fine if we do it but god forbid if someone else does
    If the US did the same thing the UK did we would condemn our politicians for ****ting on the victims of terrorists. I would be calling,writing, faxing or emailing my elected officials asking what them **** and why on earth should they have job or not be impeached, I wouldn't be trying to pin it on a particular state or territory.


    He shouldn't have been released but Scotland made that decision, may as well benefit British businesses.
    If Scotland did it was because the UK allowed it,this oh its only on the Scots is a cop out. Isn't Scotland a UK territory or state not its own country, wouldn't it be the same as Oklahoma releasing Terry Nichols?
    "A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear"

    Cicero Marcus Tullius

  5. #45
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Past the edge of the universe, through the singularity, and out the other side.
    Last Seen
    09-01-10 @ 05:23 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,324

    Re: Lockerbie bomber 'set free for oil'

    Quote Originally Posted by NEUROSPORT View Post
    doesn't that make you a conspiracy theorist ? hahahaha ! ! !

    i am shocked ! you people can actually THINK ? ? ? i thought all you do is bend over for your government and mass media.

    maybe you even knew Iraq was about Oil ? or Iran ? shocking ! ! !
    If Iraq was about oil we would have simply accepted Saddam's generous PSA offer and lift the sanctions. If Iran was about oil we would simply lift the damn embargo.

  6. #46
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Past the edge of the universe, through the singularity, and out the other side.
    Last Seen
    09-01-10 @ 05:23 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    4,324

    Re: Lockerbie bomber 'set free for oil'

    Quote Originally Posted by NEUROSPORT View Post
    in the interests of British Petroleum a democratic government in Iran was overthrown a while back.
    Try again sport it was Mossadeq not the Shah who overthrew the democratic government of Iran but continue spouting your revisionist bs.


    they tried to do it again just recently but failed.
    "They"??? Oh you mean the Iranian people?

    They bombed their own citizens on 7/7 to keep the agenda alive.
    Well that explains it you're a ****ing nut.

  7. #47
    Sage
    Laila's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Seen
    04-28-17 @ 01:48 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    10,095

    Re: Lockerbie bomber 'set free for oil'

    Quote Originally Posted by jamesrage View Post
    Let me guess you have the nerve to mock Obama birthers and 9-11 truffers?

    Those nations are doing that to their own people, it is not the same thing as crapping all over victims of a mass murdering terrorist in exchange for oil.
    It does when it is US money that helps it stay in power.
    You think if US stopped funding SA, the royalty would last?
    It serves in US's interests to keep them strong

    If the US did the same thing the UK did we would condemn our politicians for ****ting on the victims of terrorists. I would be calling,writing, faxing or emailing my elected officials asking what them **** and why on earth should they have job or not be impeached, I wouldn't be trying to pin it on a particular state or territory

    If Scotland did it was because the UK allowed it,this oh its only on the Scots is a cop out. Isn't Scotland a UK territory or state not its own country, wouldn't it be the same as Oklahoma releasing Terry Nichols?
    Lovely to think so but i doubt it would make much difference.

    Scotland has its own assembly, parliament as a product from devolution.
    Westminister has relinquished control over areas of Scotland and other territories. Everyone knows that.
    It needed Scotland's FM to release. England/Wales/N Ireland couldn't do it.


  8. #48
    Sage
    Laila's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Last Seen
    04-28-17 @ 01:48 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    10,095

    Re: Lockerbie bomber 'set free for oil'

    Quote Originally Posted by Anima View Post
    It looks as if this particular stupid thing was an SNP/Westminster team effort.
    Or perhaps the FM got played by Westminister.

    I'm angry, and annoyed. He's made this country look like an ass so Westminster can benefit financially from a better trade link with Libya. Forgetting of course that he's meant to represnt OUR interestsabove all else.

    I only supported himbeing released on compassionate grounds. I suppose it still is compassionate, in a way. He's still very sick. But there's a whole other dimension to this now that I really don't like.
    What is 'our' interests?
    British interests lies in strengthening economic wherever possible.
    In that if the ties are forged, Scotland would have helped to produce more money coming into UK.


  9. #49
    Global Moderator
    Silent Bob for President!

    RedAkston's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:46 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    33,809
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: Lockerbie bomber 'set free for oil'

    Quote Originally Posted by NEUROSPORT View Post
    should i also prove to you that sun rises in the morning and sets at night ?

    because its too much work for you to look out the window ?

    buzz off. you're a joke.
    My only question is, are you unwilling to provide proof or you can't provide proof? And you really don't need to answer because I already know. I suppose that makes you the joke now doesn't it?
    Welfare (Food Stamps, WIC, etc...) are not entitlements. They are taxpayer funded handouts and shouldn't be called entitlements at all. Social Security and Veteran's benefits are 'Entitlements' because the people receiving them are entitled to them. They were earned and paid for by the recipients.

  10. #50
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Silicon Valley
    Last Seen
    12-23-09 @ 05:40 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    616

    Re: Lockerbie bomber 'set free for oil'

    Quote Originally Posted by Agent Ferris View Post
    If Iraq was about oil we would have simply accepted Saddam's generous PSA offer and lift the sanctions.
    what would you give as the main reasons ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Agent Ferris View Post
    you're a ****ing nut.
    what an original debate technique ... NOT.

    your ability to present an argument really impresses ... NOT.
    Last edited by NEUROSPORT; 09-01-09 at 12:27 AM.

Page 5 of 6 FirstFirst ... 3456 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •