Last edited by PogueMoran; 09-09-09 at 10:12 AM.
I -know- you arent claiming the question is a fallacy, but the givens.
You -continue- to fail to understand that the givens -cannot- be falacies.
That's also -not- the given.Its the interjection you made saying that if it is shown to have been prevented by bush's torture tactics. That's the logical fallacy.
1: The Obama Administration reverses/ceases the Bush Administration counter-terrorism efforts under contention
2: there is terrorist attack that would have been stopped through the continuation of those efforts,
See? You've been wrong all this time. Just like I said.
Says the guy that apparently didnt actually read the post he's been going on and on and on about.Correlation does not make causation. I know this is a tough subject for you to comprehend and you keep twisting what you meant by calling something a given, when its not, then claiming its an assumed fact, when facts aren't assumptions
Wow. Thats gotta hurt.
I am stating that, for the purposes of this discussion, this is a fact.
A fact, not an opinion.
Thus, you're wrong.
I read the post I commented on it you then did a little dance and shifted from a given, to an assumed fact
Givens ARE assumed facts.
"You're wrong because I say you're wrong not based on reality"