Saying that all Muslims are radicals that take every page in the Koran seriously is just not true. Many Muslims are productive members of society. They DO integrate, and they are kind people. Blaming an entire religion for the actions of one person is just not right.
Also, I do hope that that Teenager is safe.
If you weren’t so totally ignorant of Islam to begin with, you would know that Islam unlike any other religion is uniquely a religion of submission that requires total and complete submission to the will of Allah. You would also know that Muslims in stark contrast to all other religions hold that their holy text is divine, that is it emanates direct from Allah (God) as delivered by Allah’s final messenger Muhammad whose message supersedes all those messages before it and as such is perfect, perfectly just, and immutable.
Thus, in stark contrast to all other religions because Islam is a religion of submission and because the holy text of Islam is considered divine, it can only be accepted in the most literal sense, and indeed for a Muslims to even question the holy text of Islam is considered to be blasphemous and blasphemy in Islam is an offense that is punishable under the pain of death.
Therefore, there is also no freedom of conscience allowed in Islam, as all Muslims are in effect slaves of Allah, and just like a slave can’t arbitrarily exercise their freedom of conscience to exit out of slavery at will, a slave of Allah can’t arbitrarily exercise his or her right to freedom of conscience to stop being a slave of Allah, as apostasy, like blasphemy, is also a capital crime under Islam.
Indeed, that is the crux of the issue with this young lady that fled from her parents, because she apostatized from Islam by converting secretly to Christianity 4 years ago, now that her apostasy has been exposed and discovered, she fears for her life, since any Muslim, not only her parents, lawfully under Sharia can kill her.
In any event, saying that I said all Muslims are radicals is ludicrous? Can you please link to where I said such a thing? Do you always make silly, stupid, and asinine assumptions when you are completely ignorant of issues?
The fact of the matter is I personally don’t quantify Muslims into so-called radicals and so-called moderates as other people do because Muslims themselves don’t classify themselves into so-called radical groups and so-called moderate groups, and also don’t like it when ignorant Westerners attempt to do it as well since it is exceedingly racist. Indeed, the president of Turkey has spoken out publicly to complain about this absurd political correct western construct on several occasions!
In fact, since your admonishment of me holds that you must be some sort of authority on Islam, then why don’t you provide us with your clear definition of what exactly constitutes a so-called radical Muslim and what exactly constitutes a so-called moderate Muslim in your clueless and idiotic mind, and how exactly they can be easily distinguished so that we can easily tell them apart?
Or are you one of those liberal people blindly loyal to political correct multiculturalism that advocates that in order to prove and demonstrate our tolerance that we should allow all of them in and then sort out the problem later, like after they have already blown up the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and have murdered thousands of innocent people.
With respect to many Muslims being productive members of society as you ignorantly assert and claim, I hate to rain on your silly, naïve, and idiotic parade, but the fact of the matter is there is no place in the non-Islamic world where Muslims have migrated in mass where the Muslims as a whole have successfully integrated and assimilated into Western society.
Indeed, the reality is very different, in every non-Islamic country in the world without exception where Muslims have migrated in mass, as the population of Muslims increased inside those countries, the problems with Muslims first multiplied, then compounded, and then inevitably morphed into an unmitigated disaster.
For instance, I recently read an article that pointed to the UK as being the country where the greatest threat of Islamic terrorist attacks targeting Americans emanates from after Pakistan. The UK can hardly be considered an Islamic country.
The article went on to explain that our US intelligence services concentrate approximately 40 percent of all our total resources to prevent Islamic terrorist attacks on the UK alone.
Would you say that Muslim immigration in the UK has been a net positive over there? Have you read the Melanie Phillips’ book titled “Londonistan” yet? I seriously doubt it since you have demonstrated how so incredibly ignorant of Islam and Muslims you are.
Indeed, remove your blinders for just one second and please point to just one non-Muslim country anywhere in the world where Muslims have immigrated in mass and where the Muslims that migrated have successfully integrated and assimilated and became productive and contributing members of their newly adoptive societies.
The reality is without exception it has turned into an unmitigated disaster in every case as soon as the population of Muslims reached critical mass, because Muslims don’t immigrate to integrate and assimilate. Instead, they immigrate to one day make Islam supreme, to replace our constitutions with the Koran, to replace our laws with their Sharia, and to forcibly convert the non-Muslims, to subjugate the non-Muslims into dhimmitude, or otherwise to kill the Mushrikins.
Moreover, can you point to a single non-Islamic country in the world where mass Muslim immigration has occurred that hasn’t inevitably become the victim of Islamic terror attacks and where those countries didn’t have to significantly increase their budgets for homeland security and tighten up their personal privacy laws?
Likewise, can you point to a single non-Islamic country anywhere in the world where Muslim mass immigration has not yet transpired that also has become the victim of Islamic terrorist attacks?
In addition, since you obviously believe in the naïve ignorant fallacy that most Muslims in the world are according to you so-called moderate Muslims, out of the 57 so-called moderate Muslim countries in the world, can you point to just one of those so-called moderate Muslim countries in the world where the non-Muslim dhimmis that are living inside those so-called moderate Muslim countries aren’t systematically persecuted and harshly oppressed?
Regarding blaming an entire religion for the actions of one person is just not right, with all due respect pull off your blinders, it is far more than just one person. Indeed, considering all the Islamic motivated violence currently taking place around the world and to attempt to narrow down the problem to just a few so-called radical individuals is to absurdly deny reality. Not only that but it demonstrates at the same time that you are not only naïve as hell, but that you are also ignorant and narrow-minded as hell when it comes to Islam.
Finally, just because Muslims describe Islam as their religion, it doesn’t mean that it is only just a religion. The reality is on top of Islam being a so-called religion it is also in addition far more of a totalitarian political movement that calls for the complete subjugation of the world than it is anything else!
The obvious reality here is that even though you clearly don’t have the first clue about Islam, you are ignorantly admonishing those that do, and that tells us a lot indeed about what kind of person you are and it doesn't paint a very pretty picture.
