If so, I guess you missed this story from 2008:
a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium — reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. operation that included a two-week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.
The removal of 550 metric tons of "yellowcake" — the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment — was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy.
FOXNews.com - Report: Uranium Stockpile Removed From Iraq in Secret U.S. Mission - International News | News of the World | Middle East News | Europe News
At Iraq's request, the US military recently transferred hundreds of metric tons of yellowcake uranium from Iraq to Canada in a secret, weeks-long operation, a Pentagon spokesman said Monday.
The 550 metric tons of uranium, which was sold to a Canadian company, was moved by truck convoy to Baghdad's "Green Zone," then flown by military aircraft to a third country where it was put on a ship for Canada, said Bryan Whitman, the spokesman.
France 24 | Iraq sells uranium to Canada | France 24
Which begs the question; if Saddam wasn’t attempting to re-constitute his nuclear WMDs, what was 550 metric tons of “yellowcake” going to be used for; a birthday party?
"An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor does truth become error because nobody sees it." - Gandhi
Did you even bother to read your own article? The Iraqi government sold this to a canadian company. The Iraqi government we put in place.
This yellowcake you speak of was from a stockpile we already knew about, we had control of and had been stored and safeguarded for years on end. Again we're talking about outlawed arms that we had no information on. That was what the problem was. We knew about this stockpile and there was no evidence that he had the means to create weapons grade uranium. Not even fox seems to support your contention. Reading comprehension try it sometime.Later, U.N. inspectors documented and safeguarded the yellowcake, which had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War. There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991, the official said.
The first link is criticizing the OMB (part of the Bush Administration,) who was responsible for the proposed rule.
The other links all clearly fall under your request as well.
Don't ****ing lie to me. You never said "alleged lawbreaking," you said:I'll ask you again!!! Can you please post a link where you were critical or questioning of the Bush Administration for alleged lawbreaking?
How do examples 2-5 not fall under that scenario? (I'm reading "Bush administration" broadly, as that was obviously what you were getting at.)Also please post threads started by yourself that expressed outrage or concern for lawbreaking under the Bush Administration?
A four year old thread where we discuss a perfectly reasonable philosophical question (that I still agree with). Point?Here is you questioning whether it is OK for Government to lie to the public.
http://www.debatepolitics.com/archiv...-citizens.html (Does Government have the right to lie to its citizens?)
Yes. I notice that you're posting threads where I express opinions on complex issues that you don't understand.Do you notice a pattern here?????
I know that you're capable of understanding this, so why don't you go back and look at those threads again. If I was really trying to defend it when Conservatives did it and criticize it when Liberals did it, then why am I defending it when Obama did it?Fake Conservatives are real concerned about law breaking and the weakening of the Constitution when Democrats are in power....but the are fine with erosions of Civil Liberties and reducing checks on Governmental power when their guys are in power.
It's called consistency.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.