Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast
Results 71 to 80 of 89

Thread: Series of Blasts in Baghdad Kill 58, Injure 300

  1. #71
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,520

    Re: Series of Blasts in Baghdad Kill 58, Injure 300

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    It's fun to watch you try and twist my words. But here :

    Yes. The war in Iraq wasn't worth it and 4,000 Americans died in vain. Do you have ANY other stupid questions? Now are you going to tell me a sob story or wave a flag in my face? I recommend you buy one made in America.
    It's no worse than you twisting my words, trying to say that I supported the invasion of Iraq. Don't act stupid and you won't look stupid. I guess your pard Redress is going to come in and cover for you, now.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  2. #72
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    42,076

    Re: Series of Blasts in Baghdad Kill 58, Injure 300

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    It's no worse than you twisting my words, trying to say that I supported the invasion of Iraq. Don't act stupid and you won't look stupid. I guess your pard Redress is going to come in and cover for you, now.
    Wow. You're a bold faced liar. Here's the post you're talking about :

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey
    .....yeah...I'm pretty sure I'd still have problem with sacrificing 4,000 soldiers for non-existent WMDs and a 3rd rate dictator with less firepower then some of my wife's relatives regardless of the war's outcome. But hey, whatever makes you feel better at night.
    Where did I say you supported the invasion? The stawman is strong within you.
    Last edited by Hatuey; 08-19-09 at 10:15 PM.
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  3. #73
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:07 AM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,343
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Series of Blasts in Baghdad Kill 58, Injure 300

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    I think the meanings are perfectly clear. Anytime someone says that an American soldier has died in vain, it's obvious what the point is.
    Any time our soldiers die in a war that we should not have been fighting it is, if not dying in vain, certainly a waste of their sacrifice.

  4. #74
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,520

    Re: Series of Blasts in Baghdad Kill 58, Injure 300

    Well, here's your actual post, where you feel the need to explain to me why you think the war is wrong, so therefore, you must have thought that I thought the invasion was the neatest thing sliced bread. Next time, post the whole thing

    .....yeah...I'm pretty sure I'd still have problem with sacrificing 4,000 soldiers for non-existent WMDs and a 3rd rate dictator with less firepower then some of my wife's relatives regardless of the war's outcome. Have you not been following the last 6 years of liberalism? Here, I'll explain to you some of the reasons as to why we're opposed to the war :

    1. It was started over information which was inflated and false pretenses. Regardless of who agreed or disagreed with them.
    2. Because of these false pretenses 4,000+ American soldiers died needlessly.
    3. We've come out worse then before. Iraq is still a ****hole. The Iraqis still aren't ready to support themselves or even care enough to do so.

    The war being a complete failure is pretty much one of the last reasons Liberals are opposed to it.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  5. #75
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,520

    Re: Series of Blasts in Baghdad Kill 58, Injure 300

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    Any time our soldiers die in a war that we should not have been fighting it is, if not dying in vain, certainly a waste of their sacrifice.
    Colonel Hal Moore said it best,

    "But in the end, they fought not for their country or their flag, the fought for each other".

    It's a sad commentary when people in this country, especially former service members don't understand that.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  6. #76
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    42,076

    Re: Series of Blasts in Baghdad Kill 58, Injure 300

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Well, here's your actual post, where you feel the need to explain to me why you think the war is wrong, so therefore, you must have thought that I thought the invasion was the neatest thing sliced bread. Next time, post the whole thing
    Wow. You're a regular Miss Cleo aren't you?

    Here's your post :

    Iraq has to appear to be a defeat for America so the Libbos can blame it one Bush and bitch for the next forty years about how we lost the war in Iraq, just like they've done with Vietnam. If the war was considered a victory, the Libbos couldn't use it as an example why we shouldn't get into the next war and if we did get into the next war they couldn't use it as an example of how we're going to lose anyway, so we might as well give up now. They'll never admit that it was their side that gave the whole show away.
    Here is my reply :

    .....yeah...I'm pretty sure I'd still have problem with sacrificing 4,000 soldiers for non-existent WMDs and a 3rd rate dictator with less firepower then some of my wife's relatives regardless of the war's outcome. Have you not been following the last 6 years of liberalism? Here, I'll explain to you some of the reasons as to why we're opposed to the war :

    1. It was started over information which was inflated and false pretenses. Regardless of who agreed or disagreed with them.
    2. Because of these false pretenses 4,000+ American soldiers died needlessly.
    3. We've come out worse then before. Iraq is still a ****hole. The Iraqis still aren't ready to support themselves or even care enough to do so.

    The war being a complete failure is pretty much one of the last reasons Liberals are opposed to it.
    Notice my post. Read it carefully. What does it say? It deals specifically with the reasons liberals oppose the war. Now you, clear as a black and white panda in a rainbow, do not teach reading comprehension but if your post speaks on why liberals wouldn't be able to oppose the war if it had been a total success and mine speaks on why liberals would still be opposed to the war. What in Katrina's name would that have to do with your opinion of the invasion?

    Please stop this?
    Last edited by Hatuey; 08-19-09 at 10:28 PM.
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  7. #77
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,520

    Re: Series of Blasts in Baghdad Kill 58, Injure 300

    Quote Originally Posted by Hatuey View Post
    Wow. You're a regular Miss Cleo aren't you?

    Here's your post :



    Here is my reply :



    Notice my post. Read it carefully. What does it say? It deals specifically with the reasons liberals oppose the war. Now you, clear as a black and white panda in a rainbow, do not teach reading comprehension but if your post speaks on why liberals wouldn't be able to oppose the war if it had been a total success and mine speaks on why liberals would still be opposed to the war. What in Katrina's name would that have to do with your opinion of the invasion?

    Please stop this?
    And the only reason you would feel the need to explain that, is because you think I supported the invasion.

    Please stop this?
    I'm only responding to your assaults, my friend.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  8. #78
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    42,076

    Re: Series of Blasts in Baghdad Kill 58, Injure 300

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    And the only reason you would feel the need to explain that, is because you think I supported the invasion.

    I'm only responding to your assaults, my friend.
    Do you not understand what a strawman-nonsequitur is?

    Here I'll give you a rundown :

    #1. You state that liberals wouldn't oppose the war if it had been a success.

    #2. I state that liberals would for A,B,C and D reasons.

    #3. You state that I claimed you supported the invasion.

    #2 is a direct response to #1. It has absolutely nothing to do with whatever your views towards the invasion are(#3). #3 is a strawman. You try to attribute to my person an argument I never made. And on top of that it has absolutely nothing to do with the conversation at hand. Seriously. Stop. You do not want to go against me on this.
    Last edited by Hatuey; 08-19-09 at 10:36 PM.
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

  9. #79
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 10:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,520

    Re: Series of Blasts in Baghdad Kill 58, Injure 300

    You state that liberals wouldn't oppose the war if it had been a success.
    I NEVER said that.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  10. #80
    Sage
    Hatuey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 11:06 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Moderate
    Posts
    42,076

    Re: Series of Blasts in Baghdad Kill 58, Injure 300

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    I NEVER said that.
    Iraq has to appear to be a defeat for America so the Libbos can blame it one Bush and bitch for the next forty years about how we lost the war in Iraq, just like they've done with Vietnam. If the war was considered a victory, the Libbos couldn't use it as an example why we shouldn't get into the next war and if we did get into the next war they couldn't use it as an example of how we're going to lose anyway, so we might as well give up now. They'll never admit that it was their side that gave the whole show away.
    I refuse to accept the view that mankind is so tragically bound to the starless midnight of racism and war that the bright daybreak of peace and brotherhood can never become a reality. - MLK

Page 8 of 9 FirstFirst ... 6789 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •