• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Wider Role Is Seen for Rove in Firings of Prosecutors

You all are the fools once again! Just keep up believing all the crap that comes out of your crap papers like NYT.

One more nowhere investigation by the far left losers!

Please remove "moderate" from your "lean" status. Look at you. You are NO WAY a moderate. Give me a break. :rofl
 
Hey, that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Care to talk about what we are?
Ahh, typical lefty tactic when caught doing something wrong. :lol:
 
Ahh, typical lefty tactic when caught doing something wrong. :lol:

Really? I thought my reaction to a democrat caught doing something wrong was the same as with republicans: investigate, prosecute, and lock em up. If you had read even just this thread, you would know that, and would not have made such a completely stupid comment.
 

I can't wait to see what the Democrat morons in the Congress say when they are done with their pathetic little witch hunt.

Alas and unfortunately and regardless of the outcome, they will have accomplished their objectives by dragging their political opponents reputations through the mud in the court of public opinion by once more impugning that criminal activity occurred where none can be found.

What continues to amaze me is how anyone on the Left can support such morons after all their efforts to suggest crimes were committed and not ONE charge can be brought.

:roll:
 
And Karl Rove is such an honest person. :roll: (sazerac, my eye rolling is at Rove and not you.)

Whether or not he has a reputation for honesty, if this:

I did not conceive of the idea of removing certain U.S. attorneys, did not select those to be removed, and did not see the lists of U.S. attorneys Justice was considering to replace. I had no idea who was on the final list until Justice sent it to the White House in November 2006.

is true (and I doubt he'd be claiming it if it weren't, given that the docs are all there), then I don't see how he isn't 100% right on this one.
 
Back
Top Bottom