Do as I say, not do as I do.
That depends -entirely- on their position on trucks/SUVs.Let me repeat: there are more factors than fuel mileage that have to be considered when purchasing a vehicle. Is a liberal farmer who needs and owns a pickup be a hypocrite? How about a liberal who uses wood heat and needs a pickup to haul wood?
On the contrary -- it would have been exactly what He should have done.Again, Obama has subsidized the purchase of more fuel efficient vehicles. By your logic, he should only have included hybrid cars in CARS, which would have been stupid and ineffective.
But instead, he subsidized over-sized, dangerous, unnecessary gas-guzzling SUVs and trucks.
None of this changes the fact that If CARS were a GWB program, you and all the other Obamanistas would be sqawking about how its just another pay-off to his Big Oil buddies.By the way, I actually praised Bush when he did things right.
You didnt answer my question.You have no credible, logical argument against CARS.
You claimed that my best argument is 'totally wrong'.
How can you say that if you cannot specify what my argument is?