Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 38

Thread: White House: 'War on terrorism' is over

  1. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    12-02-09 @ 05:13 PM
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    4,695

    Re: White House: 'War on terrorism' is over

    Quote Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und View Post
    And Obama just upped and quit.... That's real swell.
    He quit fighting terrorists?

    Link...

  2. #12
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,360

    Re: White House: 'War on terrorism' is over

    Quote Originally Posted by goldendog View Post
    He quit fighting terrorists?

    Link...



    I guess you didn't read the OP, the war on terror is over.
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

  3. #13
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:45 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,246

    Re: White House: 'War on terrorism' is over

    This ain't news. We already knew the Libbos were going to surrender to the bad guys, first chance they got.

    Can anyone say, "cut-n-run"?
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  4. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    12-02-09 @ 05:13 PM
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    4,695

    Re: White House: 'War on terrorism' is over

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    This ain't news. We already knew the Libbos were going to surrender to the bad guys, first chance they got.

    Can anyone say, "cut-n-run"?
    Can anyone say Palin. speaking of cutting and running.

    You see that is why the right has zero credibility today...Yes Bush and Cheney did cut and run from the true war on terror in Afghanistan and he put on his flightsuit swooped down on the aircraft carrier and lied his ass off.
    So he could run off too a irrelevant Iraq.

  5. #15
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:45 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,246

    Re: White House: 'War on terrorism' is over

    Quote Originally Posted by goldendog View Post
    Can anyone say Palin. speaking of cutting and running.

    You see that is why the right has zero credibility today...Yes Bush and Cheney did cut and run from the true war on terror in Afghanistan and he put on his flightsuit swooped down on the aircraft carrier and lied his ass off.
    So he could run off too a irrelevant Iraq.
    OMG!!!! And what does Plain have to do with this???

    Is she president? Is she a member of the majority party in Congress?
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  6. #16
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,360

    Re: White House: 'War on terrorism' is over

    Quote Originally Posted by goldendog View Post
    Can anyone say Palin. speaking of cutting and running.

    You see that is why the right has zero credibility today...Yes Bush and Cheney did cut and run from the true war on terror in Afghanistan and he put on his flightsuit swooped down on the aircraft carrier and lied his ass off.
    So he could run off too a irrelevant Iraq.



    Did you REALLY bring up Palin again?
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

  7. #17
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Last Seen
    12-02-09 @ 05:13 PM
    Lean
    Private
    Posts
    4,695

    Re: White House: 'War on terrorism' is over

    [QUOTE=apdst;1058178171]OMG!!!! And what does Plain have to do with this???

    Is she president? Is she a member of the majority party in Congress?[/QUOTE

    You claimed that the left were "cut and runners" I gave you two examples of how the exact opposite is true..

  8. #18
    Walk with me in hell.
    stekim's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Atlanta
    Last Seen
    09-21-10 @ 12:09 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    1,106

    Re: White House: 'War on terrorism' is over

    Does it make any difference what we call it? The only thing that matters is what we do and how we do it. The rest is bull**** semantics. Who cares?
    Wow. Am I awesome or what?

  9. #19
    Global Moderator
    Moderator

    Zyphlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    NoMoAuchie
    Last Seen
    @
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    47,939

    Re: White House: 'War on terrorism' is over

    Quote Originally Posted by Reverend_Hellh0und View Post
    And Obama just upped and quit.... That's real swell.
    Oh come on Reverend, don't be so disingenuous here. You know damn well if you read that no where did he say or it say he was going to stop fighting terrorist as you directly imply in a later post was evident by the implications of the story in the OP. They clearly state that the words aren't to be used in the white house any longer and they're taking a different tact in this then a "global 'war'". You do yourselves no favor, nor your position, by acting this oblivious and ignorant on the matter.

  10. #20
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:56 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,360

    Re: White House: 'War on terrorism' is over

    Quote Originally Posted by Zyphlin View Post
    Oh come on Reverend, don't be so disingenuous here. You know damn well if you read that no where did he say or it say he was going to stop fighting terrorist as you directly imply in a later post was evident by the implications of the story in the OP. They clearly state that the words aren't to be used in the white house any longer and they're taking a different tact in this then a "global 'war'". You do yourselves no favor, nor your position, by acting this oblivious and ignorant on the matter.



    yeah it was a little over the top. Given all the crap I read today I thought thats what we were doing?


    He did inrease troops in afghanistan, however I do not think he is being hard enough on Pakistan now.
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •