• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Barack Obama faces 30 death threats a day, stretching US Secret Service

You nailed it perfectly. No one cares about his color (which isnt black, it
is "just not white") but a lot of people care about his Marxist agenda.

That's a pretty far reaching comment to say that no one cares about his color. I'm willing to bet there are a fair amount of people who do. Obviously they are racist fringe nutjobs, but they are out there.
 
So if the guy knew nothing about Tiller, then Tiller would still be dead? If Tiller beliefs weren't constantly reinforced by hate groups, maybe he wouldn't have seen the murder of a doctor IN CHURCH as a negative thing. However, when he is led to believe that what he did was justified... (via Wikipedia)

Yeah and wikipedia is such a reputable source. :doh

Then perhaps it is the fault of religious nutjobs that tell a mentally unstable person that killing a man is okay. Normal people, for the most part, don't kill people- true. However, normal people also don't have schizophrenia. The guy who killed Tiller knew what he was doing. He planned it out. Is he guilty or not guilty by reason of insanity? That part isn't really known, but it's clear that without those ideas in his head, he would never have "randomly" picked Tiller.

We were talking about people who blame O'Reilly for Tiller's death. Why not blame the guy who actually killed him? God forbid we place the blame where it actually belongs!
 
There's no doubt that a part of the increase is because of racism. However, the increase isn't only because of racism, as some on this thread would suggest.

That's exactly what I was saying. Of course it isn't ONLY because of racism. Then again, I never made that assertion.
 
Own your comments, dude.

When I make comments like that I will certainly own up to them. Until then, feel free to keep up with the idiotic jabs. Your avoidance is duly noted. :2wave:
 
That's exactly what I was saying. Of course it isn't ONLY because of racism. Then again, I never made that assertion.

That's what you're saying, now.
 
Learn to write, dude.

I honestly don't know how to write it in such a special way that would make it understandable to you. Maybe if I put up some images as visual guides that would help.
 
You nailed it perfectly. No one cares about his color (which isnt black, it
is "just not white") but a lot of people care about his Marxist agenda.

That would be my reason; I could care less if he was purple as long as his agenda wasn't Marxism wrapped in a populist package.
 
Patrick, Apsdt......go to your corners and don't come out until you learn to be civil to each other damnit. :cool:
 
I honestly don't know how to write it in such a special way that would make it understandable to you. Maybe if I put up some images as visual guides that would help.

Perhaps if you didn't write it in your special way, people would know what you really mean.
 
Patrick, Apsdt......go to your corners and don't come out until you learn to be civil to each other damnit. :cool:

Don't look at me, cuz. He's the one that always throws the first punch.
 
Perhaps if you didn't write it in your special way, people would know what you really mean.

Well what more special way is exactly needed? I clearly wrote:

....should have more death threats

Let me redo that with more emphasis:

....should have more death threats

But then you would also have to refer to the actual post I was referring to right? Did you? No. I guess you would also have to understand the context right? Did you? No again.

But you two make your who argument on the fact that both Reagan and Bush 41 had assassination attempts made. Kudos for you for knowing a little bit of history, but it has nothing to do with my post does it? No, again.

Now I suspect this is probably just typical dishonest spin as usual. Every single time I respond to this moronic fiscal issues, well big surprise the topic needs to be changed. Just for once I would like to see the representative of the party of personal responsibility and morality show some god damn morality by being honest, and taking some responsibility in admitting that Republicans have not been very fiscally responsible. In fact, they have been downright fiscally irresponsible. But that is ok, keeping lying to yourself long enough I guess it is easier to stomach.
 
Check it, TD. Sam thinks I was talking to him.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Stop the trolling, stop the flaming, stop the baiting. Who throws the first punch is irrelevant, anyone whose throwing the punches is guilty. Next to continue will have action taken
 
I know that there aren't huge numbers of these groups around anymore. I'm just saying that it's not that much of a stretch to say that some of the increase is due to these groups.
I'm sure these groups are part of it as well, I just suspect it isn't the driving culprit, people are angry all around and it's a bad time, so Obama is the lightning rod so to speak, I think the whack jobs are coming out from all sides.
 
Back
Top Bottom