Not to mention that the 9/11 Islamic terrorist attacks trumps them all!
What does excluding non-muslim-looking folks in order to focus only on muslim-looking folks accomplish besides making non-muslim looking terrorists more likely to be successful?
If common sense and taking the best approach that does the most protecting is PC, then I guess I'm being PC.
Sarcastically pointing out the absurdity of your arguments is not putting words in your mouth.Please don't put words into my mouth. I'm sure you're smarter than that
I mean, I guess I could have just created an equally asinine hypothetical that has no basis in reality in order to back up a non-existent point in response to you doing this, but unfortunately I have a legitimate point that is supported by evidence and you cannnot cite evidence, so instead you MUST rely on an asinine hypothetical because your argument contains no substance.
Before 9/11, how many casualties did the Islamists have against the US? Are you giving them top billing because one attack was successful? Prior to that they really didn't cause many fatalities of US civilians at all. Maybe a couple of dozen. One attack changed all that.How many casualties have the nut jobs produce vs. the Islamists?
Any group is capable of making such an attack. It really wasn't hard.
Over-focussing on one group only makes it easier for another group to pull off something similar.
Instead of doing that, give EVERYONE the same degree of scrutiny.
Over-focussing leads to over-looking.
And if we focus all our efforts on stopping 9/11, which ain't EVER happening again, something worse will occur.Not to mention that the 9/11 Islamic terrorist attacks trumps them all!