- Joined
- May 21, 2005
- Messages
- 9,152
- Reaction score
- 9,269
- Gender
- Male
- Political Leaning
- Libertarian
Re: Obama's drug czar: Marijuana 'has no medical benefit'
If a significant number of people start using any drug after legalization, then we will have failed to properly implement the legalization policies; in particular, we will have failed to properly wage the "education & deglamorization" part of the war on drugs that has been so successful with tobacco.
"Chronic marijuana use is associated with development of tolerance to some effects and the appearance of withdrawal symptoms (restlessness, irritability, mild agitation, insomnia, sleep disturbances, nausea, cramping) with the onset of abstinence. Depending on the measures and age group studied, 4 percent to 9 percent of marijuana users fulfill diagnostic criteria for substance dependence. Although some marijuana users develop dependence, they appear to be less likely to do so than users of alcohol and nicotine, and the abstinence syndrome is less severe. Like other drugs, dependence is more likely to occur in individuals with co-morbid psychiatric conditions."
AMA - Report 6 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (A-01) Full t
Of course that hypothetical is true, and sure it might even happen with a few individuals, but it's been so rare in the experiences of other countries that it's barely even worth mentioning except to point out a technicality.I actually have an issue. If even one person who didn't smoke because of the illegality of weed decided to try it after it was legalized, then legalization increased the usage of marijuana.
If a significant number of people start using any drug after legalization, then we will have failed to properly implement the legalization policies; in particular, we will have failed to properly wage the "education & deglamorization" part of the war on drugs that has been so successful with tobacco.
This is not accurate. Marijuana is absolutely physically addicting. Recent studies have discovered that human brains have "canabinoid" receptors...similar to opioid receptors, the things that make opiates so physically addicting. Though less addicting than opiates, cannabis creates similar affects that can define an addiction...the need for more to get the same effect, physical/psychological withdrawal when a heavy user stops, interference in life activities, etc... These canabiniod receptors also tend to trigger the opioid receptors, both increasing the addictive effect and lending potential credence to the "gateway effect" which, for the most part, has been disproven in coorelational studies from what I can remember. Regardless, marijuana NOT being physically addictive is a fallacy. Is it as addictive as alcohol, nicotine, or heroin? No.
"Chronic marijuana use is associated with development of tolerance to some effects and the appearance of withdrawal symptoms (restlessness, irritability, mild agitation, insomnia, sleep disturbances, nausea, cramping) with the onset of abstinence. Depending on the measures and age group studied, 4 percent to 9 percent of marijuana users fulfill diagnostic criteria for substance dependence. Although some marijuana users develop dependence, they appear to be less likely to do so than users of alcohol and nicotine, and the abstinence syndrome is less severe. Like other drugs, dependence is more likely to occur in individuals with co-morbid psychiatric conditions."
AMA - Report 6 of the Council on Scientific Affairs (A-01) Full t
In most cases that's true, smoking as a method of delivery is very undesirable and they've been calling for more research to come up with less hazardous alternatives. But ultimately it should be up to doctors and their patients to decide whether the negatives outweigh the positives. The DEA (and the rest of us!) should butt the heck out of it.Further, as far as the medical benefits of marijuana, there certainly are some. They are, however, overruled by the negative effects, especially of smoking it.
Probably so, and also because the IOM recommended that it remain Schedule 1 pending further research -- which was never authorized.I believe that is why it remains a Schedule 1 drug.
Last edited: