• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Teen pregnancy and disease rates rose sharply during Bush years, agency finds

Wow, there are Allot more changes that were ensuing in our country starting in 1991 than the friken bush presidency. Its almost insane to blame Absence views by the president for an increase in pregnancies. There are so many other factors to look at. personally, i will make a correlation between the rise of the internet and computers in everyday households in the 1990s to this rise. 25% of web sites are pornographic, and 34% of web traffic is pornographic.

How is that to feed your primal instincts???????
 
So you have nothing, then?
I am open to suggestions
but since probably 1/2 of her posts are in Abortion forum there is too much to search
I am not one of those people who catalogs old posts to use at a future time. But there are some posts that are burned into the memroy. Like when 10 said she was hysterical and crying for 3 entire days when Abu Ghraib broke

you see, ego this is an interesting & educational pastime for me, not my sole source of human interaction
 
you see, ego this is an interesting & educational pastime for me, not my sole source of human interaction
I doubt that DP is anyone's sole source of interaction, so it's understandable that this is an enjoyable pastime for you. It's also understandable for someone to ask you to support your claim with facts when it's made. :shrug:
 
I doubt that DP is anyone's sole source of interaction, so it's understandable that this is an enjoyable pastime for you. It's also understandable for someone to ask you to support your claim with facts when it's made. :shrug:
and if it was a recent occurence, i would go back a few pages of her post looking
but she knows she said it. She may have mistyped, and did not mean what she typed, but she did type it but it must have been a year ago atleast
 
and if it was a recent occurence, i would go back a few pages of her post looking
but she knows she said it. She may have mistyped, and did not mean what she typed, but she did type it but it must have been a year ago atleast
Again, you are asking us to take your word on this issue. That usually does not work around here.
 
Also look into consideration of Geronimus and Korenman's The socioeconomic consequences of teen childbearing reconsidered. As noted by the abstract:

Teen childbearing is commonly believed to cause long-term socioeconomic disadvantages for mothers and their children. However, earlier cross-sectional studies may have inadequately accounted for marked differences in family background among women who have first births at different ages. We present new estimates that take into account unmeasured family background heterogeneity by comparing sisters who timed their first births at different ages. In two of the three data sets we examine, sister comparisons suggest that biases from family background heterogeneity are important, and, therefore, that earlier studies may have overstated the consequences of teen childbearing.
 
Back
Top Bottom