Yes, I did. You chose to shoot the messanger. So far, you've failed to post anything, credible, or not, that support's Chavez's legitimacy.
You have not yet posted the requested information. I asked you to post something that evidenced the illegitimacy of Chavez's elections; you instead posted something regarding the 2004 recall attempt that was overtly biased and did not provide an independent or objective source for the assertions provided therein.
Obviously, the courts said he couldn't do it; the congress said he couldn't do it; so, they decided to kick his butt out of office. I just don't have a problem with this.
That's because you evidently have a greater interest in ideological partisanship than consistent opposition to constitutional violations. You'll condemn an action so trivial as preparation for a nonbinding referendum because politically motivated individuals in the judiciary oppose it, but you'll not condemn the forcible removal and deportation of an elected head of state even though there was no clear constitutional provision for his
peaceable removal.
We're seeing more and more whose side PBO is on, so his opinion is becoming just as irrelevant as Chavez's and I'm not even going to go into how useless the UN is. But, ultimately, "the world", isn't calling for Zelaya's reinstatement.
That is a factually inaccurate assertion. There has been opposition expressed to the coup by representatives of the United Nations, the Organization of American States, Paraguay, the European Union, Chile, Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, the Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, France, Germany, Guatemala, Jamaica, Mexico, Nicaragua, Norway, Panama, Peru, Spain, the United Kingdom, the United States, Uruguay, and Venezuela. Conversely, I have not heard of support for the coup from any nation or government representatives.