• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Justices Rule for White Firefighters in Bias Case

Sotomayor didn't write ****. She was on a 3 judge panel that wrote everything.

Exactly how much of the single paragraph did Sotomayor write then??? How much of the paragraph did the other two judges write???

I'll be waiting for you to wiggle around on this one. Make it easy on everyone and admit you have no clue who wrote the opinion since no one signed it.

We DO know that Sotomayor agreed with the findings of the single paragraph though don't we???

By the way, the SCOTUS did agree with you on one thing....the Appeals Court ruling was **** !!
 
She really didn't get slapped across the face. Both sides went out of their way to avoid commenting on the panel's opinion.

Stop defending a racist judge and her racist actions.

I know you far right wingers have a huge issue with being told "no" but deal with it.

Title VII was created to keep right wing business assholes in check. They are the ONLY people who do not like Title VII. The rest of the populace is protected by it or uneffected by it.

As such, your statements lead me to believe you are a far right wing business owner who wants unchecked authority with which to rape, pilliage, lie, cheat, and steal.
 
stop defending a racist judge and her racist actions.

I know you far right wingers have a huge issue with being told "no" but deal with it.

Title vii was created to keep right wing business assholes in check. They are the only people who do not like title vii. The rest of the populace is protected by it or uneffected by it.

As such, your statements lead me to believe you are a far right wing business owner who wants unchecked authority with which to rape, pilliage, lie, cheat, and steal.

arrrrrrgggg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Arrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggg!!!!!!!!!!!!

arrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
arrrrrrgggg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Arrrrrrrrrrrrrgggggggggggg!!!!!!!!!!!!

arrrrrrrrrrrrrggggggggg!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Dude?

What the hell is your malfunction?

:confused:
 
Dude?

What the hell is your malfunction?

:confused:

No offense but that is all your posts amount to.

They don't amount to logic, they amount to emotion.

Hence the Arrgggh.

Even I get that feeling from your posts. It is like you are trying to rage against the machine in each post and it doesn't make sense.

I am not trying to be insulting, really, it just seems that way to me and obviously others.
 
Yeah, she's have to recuse herself, and it would a tie, right?

No, on both counts. She wouldn't be required to recuse herself; only judicial ethics would prompt her to do so.

But if she did, she'd replace Souter, so the vote would have been 5-3.
 
No offense but that is all your posts amount to.

They don't amount to logic, they amount to emotion.

Hence the Arrgggh.

Even I get that feeling from your posts. It is like you are trying to rage against the machine in each post and it doesn't make sense.

I am not trying to be insulting, really, it just seems that way to me and obviously others.

Exactamundo!

This is what you do sir, you just ARRGG ARRRRRGG ARRRRRRGGGG like some sideshow freak with roid rage.
 
Exactly how much of the single paragraph did Sotomayor write then??? How much of the paragraph did the other two judges write???

I'll be waiting for you to wiggle around on this one. Make it easy on everyone and admit you have no clue who wrote the opinion since no one signed it.

That's the point. It's a bit foolish to impute the entire thing to Sotomayor since we have no idea who wrote what.

We DO know that Sotomayor agreed with the findings of the single paragraph though don't we???

Yes.

By the way, the SCOTUS did agree with you on one thing....the Appeals Court ruling was **** !!

Yes.

Stop defending a racist judge and her racist actions.

I know you far right wingers have a huge issue with being told "no" but deal with it.

Title VII was created to keep right wing business assholes in check. They are the ONLY people who do not like Title VII. The rest of the populace is protected by it or uneffected by it.

As such, your statements lead me to believe you are a far right wing business owner who wants unchecked authority with which to rape, pilliage, lie, cheat, and steal.

I still don't understand - you're fiercely defending Title VII, but when Sotomayor tries to interpret it broadly, you call her a racist?

Please advise. Or don't.
 
I still don't understand - you're fiercely defending Title VII, but when Sotomayor tries to interpret it broadly, you call her a racist?
Please advise. Or don't.

Sotomayor applied it backwards --- and committed reverse discrimination when she did --- this is why I pointed out that he is a racist.

Basically, Sotomayor said in her decision reverse racism is ok. That is NOT ok. She needs to be removed from the bench.

We do not need old school racists on the bench. We do not need judicial activists either. Sotomayor is both. Therefore, she is not suitible to remain on the bench.
 
No offense but that is all your posts amount to.

They don't amount to logic, they amount to emotion.

Hence the Arrgggh.

Even I get that feeling from your posts. It is like you are trying to rage against the machine in each post and it doesn't make sense.

I am not trying to be insulting, really, it just seems that way to me and obviously others.

It makes sense ... just not to you.

For the record, yes, I am, raging against the machine. The machine sucks and needs an overhaul.
 
Moderator's Warning:
Folks please cease the personal attacks.
 
Back
Top Bottom