• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

Iran: Night Raids Terrorize Civilians

Maybe I can start some nice Middle East/Arab/Muslim joke then if you find that funny huh would you like that Laili because we can go down that road very fast.

Go ahead with Muslim jokes ...

:roll:

[Just make sure they are funny]
 
No.
Because i frankly do not care.

It cannot reach this Island now can it?
Nor can it reach Europe, it does not have such weapons yet

Actually my dear you naivity is showing not only can it reach your little Island and reach Europe but it's safe to say they can do it right now.

But the reral truth here is that I called you on something you have no idea what your talking about and when I said I can provide you with information you do the typical Left Wing switch.
 
Go ahead with Muslim jokes ...

:roll:

[Just make sure they are funny]

Oh they will not be funny as a matter of fact they will be very racist just like that post.
 
Actually my dear you naivity is showing not only can it reach your little Island and reach Europe but it's safe to say they can do it right now.

Rightttt..

The country which hasn't even got Nukes yet can now destroy UK.

I'll hide under my bed, i am now protected :doh
 
Oh they will not be funny as a matter of fact they will be very racist just like that post.

That was amusing actually.

No sense of humour then? Sad.
 
I believe we can stand idly by for a very long time, we will not and should not get involved.
Frankly, I hope events prove you right.

Britain has done the right thing. We expelled their diplomats sure but we will not join US or any other nation in any form of action against Iran.
I agree with you to the extent that the casus belli has not been made. Direct military intervention at this time would be premature and disastrous.

I do believe events could unfold which would make the casus belli, to where military intervention becomes a matter of self-interest and practical necessity.

Our history and actions is one of the factors which has led to this.
If US and UK did not invade and destroy democracy in Iran and install a dictator, do you think Ahmadinejad would be President now? I do not.
That is as may be.

Khomeini's exile from Iran in 1964 was in response to his persistent opposition to the Shah's "White Revolution" (انقلاب سفید), which included in the immediate reforms extending the franchise to women, land reform, privatization of state enterprises, and literacy efforts. Much of Khomeini's opposition was to the secularization of Iran implicit in these reforms.

[ame="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Revolution"]White Revolution - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/ame]


Khomeini's opposition to secularism would have been the case even had Mossadegh been allowed to remain in power. Ahmadinejad is the inevitable outgrowth of that opposition. Without the 1953 coup, he might have been President sooner or later--but once the Ulema in Iran reasserted themselves and reversed the trends of secularism in Iran, the likes of Ahamdinejad at the helm of Iran were a foregone conclusion.
 
rightttt..

The country which hasn't even got nukes yet can now destroy uk.

I'll hide under my bed, i am now protected :doh

what ****ing part of this don't you understand they have had nukes for over two years the iaea confirmed that as ha independent reports.

For ****ing christ sack you do unerstand that i used to do this type of stuff for a living right.
 
Frankly, I hope events prove you right.

I agree with you to the extent that the casus belli has not been made. Direct military intervention at this time would be premature and disastrous.

I do believe events could unfold which would make the casus belli, to where military intervention becomes a matter of self-interest and practical necessity.

Fair enough.

Military intervention is suicide on our part.

I cannot think of any event in which i would advocate UK sending troops. Not even one.
 
Fair enough.

Military intervention is suicide on our part.

I cannot think of any event in which i would advocate UK sending troops. Not even one.
How about Ahmadinejad conducting a successful nuclear weapons test?
 
Yeah ... i believe you ...

Really and what do I have to do to prove to you that I spent from 1993-2002 working on three different UN Weapons Inspection Team huh Laila.

Your ****ing incredable i swear it's Arabs like you who give therest a bad ****ing name no wonder you live in London because if you lived in the Middle east you woul dhav ebeen shut up long time ago.
 
Your ****ing incredable i swear it's Arabs like you who give therest a bad ****ing name no wonder you live in London because if you lived in the Middle east you woul dhav ebeen shut up long time ago.

Arab eh?

Now this is interesting ...

I'm from Syria you know .... :mrgreen:
 
what ****ing part of this don't you understand they have had nukes for over two years the iaea confirmed that as ha independent reports.

For ****ing christ sack you do unerstand that i used to do this type of stuff for a living right.

There is an old saying in Tennesee, I know its in Texas.
Probably in Tennesee that says,
"Fool me once................. Shame on..... shame on you... Fool me... (shakes head) You can't get fooled again."
 
Arab eh?

Now this is interesting ...

I'm from Syria you know .... :mrgreen:


The last time I looked Syria was an Arab Nation made up with 90% of Sunni Muslim. So are you saying your not Muslim or Arab if so then you must be either one of the following,

Kurd,Armenian,Assyrian or Circassian so what is it Laila
 
The last time I looked Syria was an Arab Nation made up with 90% of Sunni Muslim. So are you saying your not Muslim or Arab if so then you must be either one of the following,

Kurd,Armenian,Assyrian or Circassian so what is it Laila

:rofl

I do wonder how long i can drag this out for ....

Take a wild guess Scorpion ... I'll be whatever you want me to be ;)
 
What if said test were conducted in Soho, courtesy of a Hezbollah or Hamas suicide bomber/martyr?

Have they used it?
Threatened to use it?
Targeted a ally?
I will assume it has the capability to hit UK. Yes?

If the first three are a 'No'. Then my answer is No.
 
What do you mean, targeted an ally?

Pointed it and threatened to destroy a ally of the UK. A friend, a commonwealth member, Falklands, Bermuda etc.
 
:rofl

I do wonder how long i can drag this out for ....

Take a wild guess Scorpion ... I'll be whatever you want me to be ;)

I could care less to me your just like every Lib Arab I've ever came across you is afriad to really stand up and demand that your so-called religion be stop being used by folks full of hate. Till then you are just little people with no backbone and your views on Iran has just proved it to me now run along and make me some flat bread woman.
 
I could care less to me your just like every Lib Arab I've ever came across you is afriad to really stand up and demand that your so-called religion be stop being used by folks full of hate. Till then you are just little people with no backbone and your views on Iran has just proved it to me now run along and make me some flat bread woman.


If you want me to poison you sure, i can try and cook ...

Some tea anyone?
 
Have they used it?
Threatened to use it?
Targeted a ally?
Used nuclear weapons? No
Threatened use? Arguably
Targeted an ally? Definitely

Iran threatens to eliminate Israel | Iran news | Jerusalem Post
"Should Israel take any action against Iran, we will eliminate Israel from the scene of the universe," Gen. Muhammad Reza Ashtiani said in Teheran on Tuesday.
I will assume it has the capability to hit UK. Yes?
You are forgetting the discussion we had previously regarding various means of delivering nuclear weapons to a target. Ballistic missile capability is not a requirement (although do remember Iran has already demonstrated launch capability by placing a satellite into orbit).

If the first three are a 'No'. Then my answer is No.
Are the first three definitively a 'No'? I submit they are not.
 
Used nuclear weapons? No
Threatened use? Arguably
Targeted an ally? Definitely

Are the first three definitively a 'No'? I submit they are not.

Erm, Israel is a close ally of US, Not UK.
US is an ally of UK.

Two out of three is the best we'll get i suppose. Sure, invade or just cripple Iran.
 
Really and what do I have to do to prove to you that I spent from 1993-2002 working on three different UN Weapons Inspection Team huh Laila.

Your ****ing incredable i swear it's Arabs like you who give therest a bad ****ing name no wonder you live in London because if you lived in the Middle east you woul dhav ebeen shut up long time ago.
Pictures :)
 
Back
Top Bottom