Page 5 of 19 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 182

Thread: House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill

  1. #41
    Advisor Don't Tase Me Bro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    11-22-09 @ 08:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    446

    Re: House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill

    Quote Originally Posted by PeteEU View Post
    Talk about bull****.

    Spain's unemployment has zero to do with them investing heavily in green energy. It has everything to do with an over reliance on the construction industry for the last 2 decades.
    Care to provide us with some proof?

  2. #42
    Advisor rebelbuc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    New Orleans
    Last Seen
    08-21-17 @ 02:36 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian - Right
    Posts
    574

    Re: House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill

    Quote Originally Posted by disneydude View Post
    Its nice to once again have a President that isn't afraid of Science.

    The rest of the world was passing us by due to the lack of efforts of the prior administration in advancing alternative energy. Even China is exporting more solar energy than we are right now. This bill is a step in the right direction.
    Some of that "rest of the world" realized that they were going to hell in a handbasket and have regrets... but, alas, we jump into their misguided handbasket.
    Obama lied... Ambassador Stevens died!

  3. #43
    Sage
    PeteEU's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 07:36 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    29,089

    Re: House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill

    Quote Originally Posted by Don't Tase Me Bro View Post
    Care to provide us with some proof?
    Proof?

    BBC NEWS | Business | Big jump in Spanish unemployment
    Spain was until recently one of Europe's fastest growing economies, but the global financial crisis has hit the country hard, particularly affecting the property and construction sectors.
    BBC NEWS | Business | Spanish economy shrinks rapidly
    The near-collapse of its key construction industry has hit the economy hard.
    http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/06/bu...1.6018106.html

    Spanish builders constructed 750,000 houses and apartments last year, more than France and Germany combined, while annual demand runs about 60 percent of that, according to the Finance Ministry.
    Spanish home prices have more than doubled since 1998, exceeding growth rates in Britain and Ireland, two of Europe's fastest-growing markets.
    That proof enough?
    PeteEU

  4. #44
    Advisor Midwest Lib's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Last Seen
    11-30-17 @ 05:38 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    512

    Re: House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill

    Quote Originally Posted by MrVicchio View Post
    No, you're the ones taht think this is a good idea. YOU don't know what that climate bill will do, neither do anyone in the senate. They voted without reading it.

    So you cannot, CANNOT tell me that it's "scare" tactics by the right, when you don't even know WHAT damage this thing will do.

    Now can you?

    Of course, you COULD throw it in my face I cannot say that it will hurt anything, but I atleast, have history and common sense on my side, you have...

    Emotion only.
    So, tell me, have you read this bill? You seem to be quite the expert, so clearly you must have read this in it's entirety as well as every other piece of legislature that passes through congress that you seem to have such expert opinions about. If you have read this and every other bill that you've argued adamantly for or against, I withdraw my statement, but if you have only read political cliff notes then the hypocrisy of this statement is absolutely absurd. Granted, it is equally ridiculous when bills are passed through congress with much less than a glance at said legislature, but unless you have done it yourself, you have no leg to stand on.

  5. #45
    User
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Last Seen
    04-12-12 @ 08:42 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    64

    Re: House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill

    I've been speed reading the bill and may have posted in error about the tree planting. It appears voluntary. However,other things bother me. States will have to adopt new building codes with strict energy efficiency requirements which are in accordance with International standards. New buildings and substantially renovated older buildings will have to meet the requirements. Your home will be labeled based upon its energy efficiency and will be reported on the tax records. Property appraisers will be required to consider the compliance of your home with the new standards when appraising. If it would cost thousands to bring your home to par,then that is subtracted from the appraisal,thus a bank would loan you less as would a purchaser pay less.This could not come at a worse time for banks holding large portfolios of older homes as they will have to write down the values. One unusual provision is that if the home is efficient and you are borrowing to purchase the home the bank has to add to your income the estimated annual energy savings. More loans to people without income?

  6. #46
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,309

    Re: House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill

    Quote Originally Posted by PeteEU View Post
    They have not stopped building green energy projects. They in fact just put into use a huge next gen solar power plant near here. Plus the state subsidy for solar powered water heaters is still in place.

    As for "building stuff".. you have heard of the credit crisis right? The thing you yanks started? I aint saying the Spanish are angels because people have been saying (including their own politicians) for many many years that Spain was far too dependant on the construction industry, but the main reason for the collapse is the credit crisis started by the US.

    How are they building all this green stuff if there's a credit crisis? Are those projects being paid for with cash? There are contactors in Spain that are that liquid?? I'm guessing, no.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  7. #47
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:17 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,309

    Re: House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill

    Quote Originally Posted by underdog334 View Post
    I've been speed reading the bill and may have posted in error about the tree planting. It appears voluntary. However,other things bother me. States will have to adopt new building codes with strict energy efficiency requirements which are in accordance with International standards. New buildings and substantially renovated older buildings will have to meet the requirements. Your home will be labeled based upon its energy efficiency and will be reported on the tax records. Property appraisers will be required to consider the compliance of your home with the new standards when appraising. If it would cost thousands to bring your home to par,then that is subtracted from the appraisal,thus a bank would loan you less as would a purchaser pay less.This could not come at a worse time for banks holding large portfolios of older homes as they will have to write down the values. One unusual provision is that if the home is efficient and you are borrowing to purchase the home the bank has to add to your income the estimated annual energy savings. More loans to people without income?

    Whatta goddamned joke.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  8. #48
    Equal Opportunity Hater
    obvious Child's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    0.0, -2.3 on the Political Compass
    Last Seen
    12-09-14 @ 11:36 PM
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    19,883

    Re: House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill

    Quote Originally Posted by disneydude View Post
    In a huge victory for the Obama Administration:
    Correction. It is a huge victory for the ignorant.

    The bill passed lacks the necessary tooth policies required to actually combat emissions. Instead of having hard strict policies on how credits are dolled out, it has questionable writings with only 15% being sold. I highly suspect that without strong writings requiring a decrease in credits given, we'll see the same outcome as Europe and Kyoto, where government simply just gives as many credits to highly polluting industries as they need. Furthermore, the outrageous number of compromises to get the bill through ensures that a great many of polluters will comply with a form rather than a substance of the law, thus failing to actually do what we want.

    We should have done something imitating the sulfur market if a cap and trade was the way to go. IMO, the problem with cap and trade is that you must know how much the environment can handle and how much of a change is tolerable. That more or less existed for sulfur. It does not for carbon. Thus, a carbon tax would be preferable as rates could increase to incorporate better information. And we could apply emissions tax on imports that do not build the price in to level the playing field.

    This is a bad law that will eventually bite the environmentalists in the butt. Principle it is not a bad idea, but as so many good ideas go into Washington, they turn into total garbage coming out.
    "If your opponent is of choleric temperament, seek to irritate him." - Sun Tzu

  9. #49
    Advisor Don't Tase Me Bro's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    South Carolina
    Last Seen
    11-22-09 @ 08:11 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    446

    Re: House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill

    Quote Originally Posted by PeteEU View Post
    That proof enough?
    It's proof that the industry has had a major negative impact on their economy and undoubtedly makes up a substantial portion of their unemployment rate, however it does not prove, nor is it in any reality, the only reason for their high unemployment rate. It does not disprove that what Caldaza reports is true.

    But Calzada's report concludes that they often are temporary and have received $752,000 to $800,000 each in subsidies -- wind industry jobs cost even more, $1.4 million each. And each new job entails the loss of 2.2 other jobs that are either lost or not created in other industries because of the political allocation -- sub-optimum in terms of economic efficiency -- of capital. (European media regularly report "eco-corruption" leaving a "footprint of sleaze" -- gaming the subsidy systems, profiteering from land sales for wind farms, etc.) Calzada says the creation of jobs in alternative energy has subtracted about 110,000 jobs from elsewhere in Spain's economy.

  10. #50
    Sage
    akyron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Texas
    Last Seen
    Today @ 11:51 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Other
    Posts
    6,444

    Re: House narrowly passes major energy-climate bill

    Democrats off-loading economics to pass climate change bill.-WSJ

    "Waxman-Markey would cost the economy $161 billion in 2020, which is $1,870 for a family of four. As the bill's restrictions kick in, that number rises to $6,800 for a family of four by 2035.

    Note also that the CBO analysis is an average for the country as a whole. It doesn't take into account the fact that certain regions and populations will be more severely hit than others -- manufacturing states more than service states; coal producing states more than states that rely on hydro or natural gas. Low-income Americans, who devote more of their disposable income to energy, have more to lose than high-income families."

    "Even as Democrats have promised that this cap-and-trade legislation won't pinch wallets, behind the scenes they've acknowledged the energy price tsunami that is coming. During the brief few days in which the bill was debated in the House Energy Committee, Republicans offered three amendments: one to suspend the program if gas hit $5 a gallon; one to suspend the program if electricity prices rose 10% over 2009; and one to suspend the program if unemployment rates hit 15%. Democrats defeated all of them."

    "Americans should know that those Members who vote for this climate bill are voting for what is likely to be the biggest tax in American history. Even Democrats can't repeal that reality."





    U G L Y.....


    If environmentalists really want to save the environment so badly they should kill themselves and provide fertlizer for the earth. Much more effective and minimizes the noxious emissions coming out of various orifices.
    Thank you

Page 5 of 19 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •