Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 75

Thread: US will not use force to inspect N. Korean ship

  1. #11
    Enemy Combatant
    Kandahar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Last Seen
    10-15-13 @ 08:47 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    20,688

    Re: US will not use force to inspect N. Korean ship

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Wow! Sounds alot like the argument used to stay out of WW2. Interesting!
    So you're saying that we should respond to even the most minor provocation with a nuclear war?
    Are you coming to bed?
    I can't. This is important.
    What?
    Someone is WRONG on the internet! -XKCD

  2. #12
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:46 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,317

    Re: US will not use force to inspect N. Korean ship

    Quote Originally Posted by Kandahar View Post
    So you're saying that we should respond to even the most minor provocation with a nuclear war?
    Not at all. Why is that Libbos always interpret things in the most possible way?
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  3. #13
    Enemy Combatant
    Kandahar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Last Seen
    10-15-13 @ 08:47 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    20,688

    Re: US will not use force to inspect N. Korean ship

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Not at all. Why is that Libbos always interpret things in the most possible way?
    Then what exactly DO you want to do?
    Are you coming to bed?
    I can't. This is important.
    What?
    Someone is WRONG on the internet! -XKCD

  4. #14
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:46 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,317

    Re: US will not use force to inspect N. Korean ship

    Quote Originally Posted by Kandahar View Post
    Then what exactly DO you want to do?
    Board the ship; by force if neccessary. If it's suspected of carrying illegal materials, then we have a duty to board and search the vessel.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  5. #15
    Enemy Combatant
    Kandahar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Last Seen
    10-15-13 @ 08:47 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    20,688

    Re: US will not use force to inspect N. Korean ship

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Board the ship; by force if neccessary. If it's suspected of carrying illegal materials, then we have a duty to board and search the vessel.
    And if the ship refuses to stop and/or fires on the American ship?
    Are you coming to bed?
    I can't. This is important.
    What?
    Someone is WRONG on the internet! -XKCD

  6. #16
    Sporadic insanity normal.


    The Mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Pennsylvania
    Last Seen
    Today @ 03:51 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    19,736

    Re: US will not use force to inspect N. Korean ship

    Quote Originally Posted by Kandahar View Post
    And if the ship refuses to stop and/or fires on the American ship?
    That's where the "by force if necessary" bit comes in.
    Education.

    Sometimes I think we're alone. Sometimes I think we're not. In either case, the thought is staggering. ~ R. Buckminster Fuller

  7. #17
    Enemy Combatant
    Kandahar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Last Seen
    10-15-13 @ 08:47 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    20,688

    Re: US will not use force to inspect N. Korean ship

    Quote Originally Posted by The Mark View Post
    That's where the "by force if necessary" bit comes in.
    And how exactly do they board the ship by force while being fired upon? Is Spiderman in the US Navy now?
    Last edited by Kandahar; 06-26-09 at 09:41 PM.
    Are you coming to bed?
    I can't. This is important.
    What?
    Someone is WRONG on the internet! -XKCD

  8. #18
    Sage
    apdst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Bagdad, La.
    Last Seen
    Today @ 01:46 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Very Conservative
    Posts
    76,317

    Re: US will not use force to inspect N. Korean ship

    Quote Originally Posted by Kandahar View Post
    And if the ship refuses to stop and/or fires on the American ship?
    Then we send that piece of crap to the bottom. It ain't rocket science.
    Quote Originally Posted by Top Cat View Post
    At least Bill saved his transgressions for grown women. Not suggesting what he did was OK. But he didn't chase 14 year olds.

  9. #19
    Enemy Combatant
    Kandahar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Washington, DC
    Last Seen
    10-15-13 @ 08:47 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    20,688

    Re: US will not use force to inspect N. Korean ship

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Then we send that piece of crap to the bottom. It ain't rocket science.
    And if North Korea responds by executing American reporters or firing missiles at Hawaii?
    Are you coming to bed?
    I can't. This is important.
    What?
    Someone is WRONG on the internet! -XKCD

  10. #20
    Sage
    disneydude's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Last Seen
    Yesterday @ 02:01 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Liberal
    Posts
    25,129

    Re: US will not use force to inspect N. Korean ship

    Quote Originally Posted by apdst View Post
    Then we send that piece of crap to the bottom. It ain't rocket science.
    This just displays the same naivite and lack of foreign policy understanding that made the prior administration such a disaster.
    <font size=5><b>Its been several weeks since the Vegas shooting.  Its it still "Too Early" or can we start having the conversation about finally doing something about these mass shootings???​</b></font>

Page 2 of 8 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •