Page 5 of 19 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 188

Thread: Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran

  1. #41
    Sage
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Last Seen
    08-27-09 @ 08:41 PM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    6,344

    Re: Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    So we should go to war with Iran?
    Not yet. Wait for them to kill the BBC reporters and a few Frenchies. Then the US can go in with the entire UN doing their usual pom-pom cheerleading routine.

  2. #42
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:02 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,290
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by Triad View Post
    So whats your plan, other then to complain?
    To do what we are doing. I don't see a good option for us to do anything active. Akhmadinajad(sp?) is already saying we are interfering with the election process.

  3. #43
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Seen
    07-18-09 @ 04:56 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,041

    Re: Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by celticlord View Post
    Not yet. Wait for them to kill the BBC reporters and a few Frenchies. Then the US can go in with the entire UN doing their usual pom-pom cheerleading routine.
    IF they process turn into something more then protests(either naturally or do to being slaughtered) then we should aid them with arms and such.

    Otherwise

    If they do not stop their nuclear program by March 2010... then or within a year of then the US/UK/FR/GER should declare War on Iran.


    Won't happen because we Jimmy Obama is in the WH...he talks only..He'll even push talks over the people protesting for freedoms.

  4. #44
    Liberal Fascist For Life!


    Redress's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Georgia
    Last Seen
    Today @ 05:02 PM
    Lean
    Very Liberal
    Posts
    93,290
    Blog Entries
    2

    Re: Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by Triad View Post
    IF they process turn into something more then protests(either naturally or do to being slaughtered) then we should aid them with arms and such.

    Otherwise

    If they do not stop their nuclear program by March 2010... then or within a year of then the US/UK/FR/GER should declare War on Iran.


    Won't happen because we Jimmy Obama is in the WH...he talks only..He'll even push talks over the people protesting for freedoms.
    You going to volunteer to fight over there?

  5. #45
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Seen
    07-18-09 @ 04:56 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,041

    Re: Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by Redress View Post
    To do what we are doing. I don't see a good option for us to do anything active. Akhmadinajad(sp?) is already saying we are interfering with the election process.


    Yep Obama piolicy..do nothing ..wow that was hard...pff.


    ....and you as Obama is worried more about the Iranian governments view of how things then the protestors.
    What do the Despots think..we don't want to upsets them! Obama 100%



    After they put down the protesters the USA will reward them with a photo op and talks with Obama.
    Maybe the messiah can walk on blood?

  6. #46
    Sage
    Arcana XV's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Geneva, Switzerland and Rochester, NY
    Last Seen
    10-22-17 @ 10:25 AM
    Gender
    Lean
    Independent
    Posts
    6,412

    Re: Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran

    It doesn't matter if you guys meddle or not. The Iranian regime has already blamed you for everything anyway:

    Iran accuses US of meddling after disputed vote - Yahoo! News

    TEHRAN, Iran Iran accused the United States on Wednesday of "intolerable" meddling in its internal affairs, alleging for the first time that Washington has fueled a bitter postelection dispute. Opposition supporters marched in huge numbers through Tehran's streets for a third straight day to protest the outcome of the balloting.
    The Iranian government summoned the Swiss ambassador, who represents U.S. interests in Iran, to complain about American interference, state-run Press TV reported.
    The English-language channel said the government called Western interference "intolerable."
    Seriously, stop your meddling. It's intolerable.
    "Yes, but are you a Protestant atheist or a Catholic atheist?".- Northern Irish joke

  7. #47
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Seen
    07-18-09 @ 04:56 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,041

    Re: Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran

    There you go..we're already being blamed for meddling so lets actually meddle.

    If meddling is standing behind the principles of the USA and aiding those who want to harm a theocratic despotism then we shoud meddle.

    Meddling is American.
    Doing nothing is not.

  8. #48
    Sage
    kaya'08's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    British Turk
    Last Seen
    05-12-14 @ 01:14 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Centrist
    Posts
    6,363

    Re: Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran

    Quote Originally Posted by Triad View Post
    Yep Obama piolicy..do nothing ..wow that was hard...pff.


    ....and you as Obama is worried more about the Iranian governments view of how things then the protestors.
    What do the Despots think..we don't want to upsets them! Obama 100%
    Ahh triad, triad. Your obviously poorely informed about the definition of strategic foriegn policy and the relation between war and government debt. The US is in deficit of over a few trillion dollars because of the war in Iraq and Afghanistan, one of the most costly wars in US history. Secondly, to invade Iran would be a huge mistake and will mark the definite end of America. As if the muslims dont think we are crusading against them anyway.
    Its not Iran that needs to be invaded - at least there partly civilized compared to our communist NK foe in the pacific. With America already stretched fighting two very costly fronts, one front being in a dire situation (Afghanistan), to attack Iran would not only be economically and diplomatically suicidal, but would divert attention from the dangerous activities of North Korea and allow its illegal nucleur activities to thrive behind our backs. We need to sort out the most immediate threat first.



    After they put down the protesters the USA will reward them with a photo op and talks with Obama.
    Maybe the messiah can walk on blood?
    Meaningless, unreasonable rightist talk.
    Last edited by kaya'08; 06-17-09 at 07:20 PM.
    "If religious instruction were not allowed until the child had attained the age of reason, we would be living in quite a different world" - Christopher Hitchens
    > Good to be back, but I'm only visiting for a few weeks. <

  9. #49
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Last Seen
    07-18-09 @ 04:56 AM
    Lean
    Undisclosed
    Posts
    1,041

    Re: Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran

    Gibbs said today that the protests are
    "A vigorous debate inside Iran"


    Yep..please shut up and die USA is not interested.
    Last edited by Triad; 06-17-09 at 07:44 PM.

  10. #50
    ANTI**ANTIFA
    ReverendHellh0und's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Temple of Solomon
    Last Seen
    Today @ 04:52 PM
    Gender
    Lean
    Libertarian
    Posts
    75,441

    Re: Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran

    Contrast "Obama refuses to 'meddle' in Iran"


    To "Gorbachav tear down this wall"



    /thread
    Let evil swiftly befall those who have wrongly condemned us

Page 5 of 19 FirstFirst ... 3456715 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •