• This is a political forum that is non-biased/non-partisan and treats every person's position on topics equally. This debate forum is not aligned to any political party. In today's politics, many ideas are split between and even within all the political parties. Often we find ourselves agreeing on one platform but some topics break our mold. We are here to discuss them in a civil political debate. If this is your first visit to our political forums, be sure to check out the RULES. Registering for debate politics is necessary before posting. Register today to participate - it's free!

McCain: Iran Election "Corrupt"

That's hilarious.

The US Gov't is one of the most corrupt governing bodies in the world!!
 
guess who is praising Obama’s approach and saying Obama’s right to refrain from McCainian chest-thumping: George W. Bush’s top negotiator with Iran, Ambassador Nicholas Burns.

In an interview today with NPR, Burns praised Obama’s handling of the crisis, and said that a more aggressive response would actually play into the hands of President Ahmadinejad.

“President Ahmadinejad would like nothing better than to see a very aggressive series of statements by the United States that would try to put the U.S. in the center of this,” Burns said. “And I think President Obama is avoiding that quite rightly.”

“This is not a dispute for the U.S. to be the center of,” Burns said at another point. “It’s up to Iranians to decide who Iran’s future leaders will be. He said he respects Iran’s sovereignty. I think it was important to do that.”
Click to expand...

Bush’s Man In Iran Lauds Obama’s Handling Of Iran Crisis | The Plum Line
 
When the BBC can't figure out where he stands he stands on nothing.


Obama does nothing but aggrandize himself at the expense of others.
This case its Democracy/Freedom/US Principles
In Iraq its our Soldiers/Allies/Civilians
In the "WORLD" its the USA.


If the "leaders" call for US support the US will not be there..its too busy powdering its babies butt for the cameras.


Obama made clear that official US policy is to talk talk talk just like he wants and nothing else.
He blew air in his comments and offically pushed for talks while the protester situation is in flux.

Whats more important to him catz..the potential to support an Iranians coup..OR his picture in papers talking to Iran?
Which one is it?...based on the evidence its the later.

Least some of the media is finally starting to call BS BS. Or at least as with the BBC(of all places) not covering him in flowers but pointing out that he said nothing.



Anyway..

SO Kandahar..when?
 
Last edited:
Triad said:
When the BBC can't figure out where he stands he stands on nothing.

Obama does nothing but aggrandize himself at the expense of others.

This case its Democracy/Freedom/US Principles
In Iraq its our Soldiers/Allies/Civilians

In the "WORLD" its the USA.

If the leaders cal for US support the US will not be there..its too busy powdering its babies butt for the cameras.


Obama made clear that official US policy is to talk talk talk just like he wants and nothing else.
He blew air in his comments and offically pushed for talks while the protester situation is in flux.

Whats more important to him catz..the potential to support an Iranians coup..OR his picture in papers talking to Iran?
Which one is it?...based on the evidence its the later.

Least some of the media is finally starting to call BS BS. Or at least as with the BBC(of all places) not covering him in flowers but pointing out that he said nothing.
Click to expand...

Bush's former ambassador to Iran made it very clear that now is not the time for Obama to "do something" other than what he's done.

I'm sorry you're unhappy that Obama isn't the president, but this isn't a partisan issue. He's played it right on this one...so far.
 
Last edited:
Mr. Obama added: “When I see violence directed at peaceful protesters, when I see peaceful dissent being suppressed, wherever that takes place, it is of concern to me and it is of concern to the American people. That is not how governments should interact with their people.”

Mr. Obama also said that “something has happened in Iran,” leading to “a questioning of the kinds of antagonistic postures towards the international community that have taken place in the past. That there are people who want to see greater openness and greater debate and want to see greater democracy. How that plays out over the next several days and several weeks is something for the Iranian people to decide.”
Click to expand...

From Obama's press conference today with South Korean president Lee Myung-bak.

He's doing it right.
 
Publicly..Iranians make own decision we do nothing. USA is a burden.
Privately... Ignore them the talks are all that matters.

He's doing right!!


Hopefully Biden will become President. Be nice to have an American President.
Hell it would be nice to have Hillary Clinton right now..even her screw ups would make Obama's so called decisions look childish.
 
Last edited:
U.S. State Department speaks to Twitter over Iran | Industries | Technology, Media & Telecommunications | Reuters

Obama intervenes, asks Twitter to delay scheduled maintenance to keep Iranian lines of communication open

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. State Department contacted the social networking service Twitter over the weekend to urge it to delay a planned upgrade that could have cut daytime service to Iranians, a U.S. official said on Tuesday.

"We highlighted to them that this was an important form of communication," said the official of the conversation the department had with Twitter at the time of the disputed Iranian election. He declined further details.
Click to expand...
 
Catz Part Deux said:
CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive - McCain calls Iran vote result ‘corrupt’ - Blogs from CNN.com

Hopefully, Obama will follow suit.
Click to expand...

We need Mr.Bush back, not weakly Mr. Obama!
Or better a new Mr. Reagan!All muslims world lough about funny speachof Mr. Obama in Cairo.

ronald_reagan.jpg

source:ClassyMusic
 
If you don't understand the role that twitter is currently playing in this, you should educate yourself or stfu. :2wave:
 
Oh yes Twitters ability to spread unsubstantiated claims from all corners is unique!


PULEEESE
 
I dont think you need an assist catz, dont slap the children to hard:lol::lol::lol:
 
Catz Part Deux said:
Well, it's got a long ways to go to catch up to faux news.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

OH I'm sorry I didn't realize you became that stupid in the last few months.....

Anyway when your done riding the great LSD space train.

'twitter'..LOL

//////////


_45928525_rally_afp260.jpg


Photo-shopped?...I think so.
 
Last edited:
Triad said:
Ok when is the deadline on this for you.

I want some realistic deadline not oh when the sky is colored blue and bam flies by your window on fairy wings.

Iran has until date x to stop or else.

When is that...?
Click to expand...

To stop what? Or else what?

Triad said:
Negotiations already failed. You like many others who argue the same way you are ignore that.
SO DUH I don't want more talks, more fake promises, more empty words, more high minded nonsense the time for talking is over.
Click to expand...

What do you propose to do?

Triad said:
Every damn year Iran says UP YOURS, DEATH TO THE JEWS ,DEATH TO AMERICA, supplies terrorist etc..... and continue processing nuclear material while obviously to any idiot trying to make a weapon.
Click to expand...

I've heard their buffoonish president say such things a few times, but I have never heard Iran (or any other nation) say a word. I thought only humans could talk, but apparently I was wrong.

As for their nuclear program, it will be almost impossible to stop them since the nuclear research has broad popular support among Iranians, who view it as a symbol of national pride. However, it might be possible to dissuade them from actually producing a weapon. That might not be the answer you want, but it's about the best outcome you're going to get.

Triad said:
IMO Obama and probably you will do this every year until Iran gets a nuclear weapon and then turn right around and say well we can't do anything about it now.
IOW its stops when Iran gets what it wants.
Click to expand...

What do you propose to do?
 
Last edited:
I'm done with 50 bazillion tilted questions or fantastically laughable amnesia routines about whats being referred to.



How long until you demand Iran cease..at the very least what Year?
 
Last edited:
Triad said:
I'm done with 50 bazillion tilted questions or fantastically laughable amnesia routines about whats being referred to.
Click to expand...

It probably took you longer to write that smartass sentence than it would have taken you to answer the question.

Triad said:
How long until you demand Iran cease..at the very least what Year?
Click to expand...

Cease doing what? And what will I do if Iran does not meet my demands to cease doing whatever?
 
Question is simple.
 
Triad said:
Question is simple.
Click to expand...

And once again, it took you just as long as to write a smartass response as it would have taken you to define the terms of your question. I'm not going to play games. If you actually have a question that you would like me to answer, you can ask it. But I'm not going to try to guess what you're talking about.
 
IOW you don't have one.
Even Obama has a tentative one.
 
Last edited:
Triad said:
IOW you don't have one.
Even Obama has a tentative one.
Click to expand...

Like I said, I'm not going to play games. I'm not going to guess what you're talking about. I'm not going to give you a timeline for Iran to stop doing X, or else Y, until you define X and Y.

If you actually want an answer, you can clarify your question. Otherwise, I'm done. :2wave:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom