No, actually democracy is obligated to allow the people to form the parties of their choice.
You could look the word up, you know.
Freedom is a relative term, of course there is a middle ground.
No, if people can't form the political alliances they choose, they don't have political freedom and their nation isn't a democracy.
You have the freedom of movement, but you can't move through/into restricted areas.
Yeah, it's hard for me to walk through walls, too, no matter how much freedom I have.
The rights of the individual to own property supersed the right of another individual to wander at will.
What's that got to do with the freedom to associate with others?
Oh, that's right, nothing.
It has nothing to do with majority and minority.
Yes, real democracies rapidly make slaves of the minorities.
Fortunately, I don't live in a democracy and don't respect them. However, we're discussing a limited democracy in which the freedoms of the minority are protected by law from oppression by the majority.
Democracy can in fact prevent parties with extreme ideas that oppose democracy in a clear and obvious way from partaking in the elections.
No.
Democracies can have a higher law, like the US Constitution, the limits the ability of the majority to impose laws limiting the freedoms of the minorities, once those parties are in power, but there's no democratic basis for telling people who they can and cannot allow in their voluntary associations known as political parties.
And it makes no difference if those people get elected, if the constitution prohibits them from making law that oppress the minorities.
Put it another way, you can't eliminate oppression and intolerance by practicing oppression to demonstrate your intolerance of someone else.
Do you honestly believe that if Hitler came back to life and re-organized his National-Socialist party in Germany, and assuming it wins the elections, the state of Germany would just accept it with an open arms?Really?
Really? Did I say that somewhere? Funny, I don't recall saying that.