I don't find much difference between race and gender bias. Do the posters here throw a hissy fit when our own Sect'y of State makes nice nice with countries that curtail the rights of women?
That can only be because something like this happening must have been thought to not be possible.
There are laws about refusing people jobs based on their race, aren't there?
Their constitution could be found to go against some laws I would have thought.
If something new were needed it should have been brought in before. It is crazy that it was not.
Last edited by alexa; 06-15-09 at 10:45 AM.
You know the time is right to take control, we gotta take offense against the status quo
Originally Posted by A. de Tocqueville
Making them admit non-whites does nothing. It won't prevent them from being racist, it won't change their minds on things. It'll just give them fuel for their hatred if anything.
So by making them change the stated rules, the same racists will be in power, but they'll just be a smidgen less openly racist than before. Why make them hide their ignorance?
Tucker Case - Tard magnet.
Real democracy has the right to defend itself from elements that might lead to anti-democratic policies.
If there's a party that doesn't support one of the major values of democracy, you ban it from partaking in the elections.
And if the BNP supports inequality, then their place is out of the politics ground.
I really can't understand what sane democracy would allow an anti-democratic party to be a part of its government.
"The darkest places in hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality in times of moral crisis."
Living in a democracy and accepting it means you should also accept those you disagree with. No Government should ever have the ability to ban parties, such a thing inevitably leads aways from democracy
the BNP have an history of law breaking and acts of terrorism by thier members and leaders